This also means we have to move the declaration/documentation of the
event up one level into the generic "part" widget.
Change-Id: I1b803201f8955b58136ee7f37c04c01edcd47395
The code that receives this event does not need to know that the
source is a "parameter". It's just some "item" in the sidebar. The
idea is to reuse the event for both top-level parts as well as
parameters. This will be done in the next patch.
Change-Id: I858040f5adf8e156b6013caaa527b3237b7bac0f
What I found is a single `$container.animate( animations )` that's
responsible for the misbehavior described in T312768.
This method is called from a few places. I think none of these places
benefits from making this an animation. This is often more distracting
than helpful, especially when navigating with the keyboard.
Bug: T312768
Change-Id: I90a80d6ae8c1b47ee22297d2520255cad890b90e
Fix setParameter() and let it (un)highlight parameters independent
from a selection (called "set" here).
Bug: T312925
Change-Id: Ie4e9ba94659f4f70160193ca6bec804f8a4473e4
These comments just repeat what the code says. Most of them are
copied from OOUI. Some talk about BookletLayout – a class name we
don't use any more.
Change-Id: I7ce354dfe059657395103ffef767eb8f6d37bfb7
Note how the two-pane layout was already handling the two events
identical:
sidebarPartSelected: 'onSidebarItemSelected',
templateParameterSelected: 'onSidebarItemSelected'
We move this knowledge up one level into the sidebar. Both actions
now trigger the same event.
This implies that we are now using the event formerly known as
"sidebarPartSelected" to act on both top-level parts as well as
parameters. We reflect this by renaming it to "sidebarItemSelected".
Change-Id: I9a2c95f91f05de7312d38ec4c8b360141a0c447d
The optimization removed in this patch is done twice. The effect is
that the loop does not end when it finds a match but the match happens
to be the current page.
This doesn't change anything. It's really only about performance.
Change-Id: I5c2de101eb2f14f814f00cf7eacf46b70346f4c8
This is not only fired when a parameter is added. It's also fired
when pressing spacebar on a parameter that already exists.
Change-Id: I245aa9f5938eb38c3a3f224a4d642d57068cf23b
This is not only fired when a parameter is checked or unchecked.
It's also not only fired when another parameter in the parameter
SelectWidget is selected. It's always fired just because the
spacebar is pressed. This is so we can scroll that parameter into
view.
Change-Id: Id621405b7ca3116cd4a06f474e49776d0830dccc
This line was added as part of I0229b63. While what the comment says
is still true to some degree, the line stopped being helpful when
we introduced sticky headers. When scrolling the sidebar for a
multi-part template with many parameters the sticky header jumps up
and down by this 1 pixel.
TL;DR: This is one of these hacks where it's better to remove it and
look for a better solution when we notice the original issue again.
Bug: T312768
Change-Id: I2fedea4e1d4d6c95c74a63c522821a6ebc2ee2b2
250ms gaps are pretty common when typing at a normal speed, resulting
in a lot of (often expensive) API requests (e.g. T312319). For most
use cases this level of responsiveness in the preview is not necessary.
Change-Id: I6504567d4da02a66171ee35a9c4fd35c85136909
This patch contains a small cleanup that moves the scrollIntoView into onSidebarItemSelected.
Since all other places already have a focus call, scrollIntoView is not needed there.
Bug: T312850
Change-Id: I1a3cb3905faea2bd8a6bf8dc4cfd748813e1c875
This regression from Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431.
Not calling the parent here was is essential, because when clicking
the checkboxes this event will trigger the focus of the whole widget.
That's not what we want in this case though. Also it seems we don't
need any of the logic from the parent and can get rid of that
complexity.
Bug: T312855
Bug: T312856
Bug: T312924
Change-Id: Ib3a2eeeb6d519dfa1bb627049f6b3a4708017e86
Using Parsoid HTML in the 2017WTE has enabled us to iron
out lots of rendering bugs over the past few years.
In that time Parsoid has been moved into PHP, and at some point
we also become the default parser.
Also more extensions have started to use content transform hooks,
which are only supported by the action API.
As a result it now seems like a good time to migrate back to the
content API instead of building the preview from Parsoid HTML.
Bug: T154844
Change-Id: I90d775dd71d5f5a61d651b63d946ab60a27e2ca3
Fixes a bug that crashes the interface when unsetting the focus after
another input was focused, because `page` is undefined in this case.
We were already calling `setPage` to unset focus, so document it.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: I2926beffe23e0ee822f5690d4791534a5413886a
This can only happen when deleting the last part of a transclusion,
then we want to set the previous page as selected. This should never
be a parameter though.
Bug: T312221
Change-Id: I06700dcf37f6d4f7dd073f8f2bc1b8b0a17a62c4
Just putting this eslint auto fix out there. No hard feelings, but
a warning that pops up everytime.
Change-Id: I157e0338e5f5a6f27dbbd9ae116da0f922468586
Triggers scroll in all situations where highlighting changes.
Including keyboard navigation.
Bug: T312542
Change-Id: I849f64c5cefe0cac3fde6e848b23b7b0cfc489ce
Introducing a set method to have a different state for a set
parameter and a highlighted one in the selection.
Allows us to remove a lot of workarounds for missusing the
highlight state and fixes several issues with these workarounds.
Main implications:
- Keyboard navigation and mouse hover now sets the grey highlight
- If a parameter is set (blue highlight) keyboard navigation returns
when focusing the SelectWidget
- If nothing is set keyboard navigation starts at the top after focus
- Unchecking a parameter using space will not influence the keyboard
focus in the list
- Highlighting a parameter with the mouse lets keyboard navigation
continue from there.
Bug: T312647
Bug: T311204
Bug: T312213
Depends-On: I385dca1d95033961d3844e888521750443e49c95
Change-Id: Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431
This prevents an invisible and unactionable focus target when the
parameter search field doesn't match anything.
Bug: T312547
Change-Id: Ib29913a547cd68649d29e28d921c4c1358bad7b8
The last checkbox in the entire sidebar should get the extra bottom
margin, but not the last checkbox in each template group.
Follow-up on I1edc5db98d16a4c0de8abd7f705776fb9eb65b97
Change-Id: I4ffade9c053191ce202340edadbd032c67bb39a4
Causes problems when we remove a parameter using the spacebar, for
example.
This partially reverts Id3843b2c7ad6.
Bug: T312524
Bug: T312205
Change-Id: I65d834bc0d2cc649803b536ecc65bdd1fa166a32
Using a certain amount of depth to make sure to override OOUI
specificity.
More can be done in follow ups.
Change-Id: I1edc5db98d16a4c0de8abd7f705776fb9eb65b97
Should be a noop. Also moving one rule further up to the set of
similar selectors.
Removing one rule that was disabled for some time now.
Optimizations follow.
Change-Id: I8da70a52c13afd8ac1c3ff43bae63a203c3bf86a
We don't want to restore selection. Instead, we'll remove all
parameter selections onFocus, in a later patch.
This reverts commit 787d44af66.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: Ia1dc8061dfd1813a58befff5adc5c3882b54d8e2
Gets rid of some unused behaviors that we've already disconnected.
Brings the remaining styling into VE files.
Bug: T312524
Change-Id: Ie94472019ba41124831621c45713861297219594
Both parts are not relevant anymore:
- The first part is about focusing parameter placeholder pages.
These are added after load only when using the keyboard shortcut.
Focus will be done separately in that case.
- The second part is dead code since some time now. Also it is not
needed here. Scrolling to newly added parameters is done via the
setPage() method in the layout.
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I928afef01b9e62a9da91db10340d9df78717e125
This should be safe because selection is only set from use cases
in which we do want the sidebar scrolled to the matching item.
Bug: T290975
Change-Id: Ib0c66bb048768d633d0f638c775eba24cd652db8
... except on mobile because the keyboard will expand.
Need to disable a spurious focus when the element isn't visible,
because this was making it impossible to focus later once it becomes
visible.
Bug: T290975
Change-Id: I0e6057d1cfbef24324a287e50e4988f935720c61
Instead of using a potentially weird fractional value like 3.2 lets
use the floor(ed) value, e.g. 3. Reasoning: These fractions are not
from text lines but optional margins between some of the lines. These
margins should not be counted.
Also increase the cut point from >=3 to >3. This is much closer to
the original specification that talked about "2 lines plus x
characters". See T273426. These "x characters" are the 3rd line.
Bug: T310775
Change-Id: Ib5d1642d7967593dd5f13e556c6244fc44677af4
When blurring out of keyboard parameter navigation, the
last-selected parameter will be highlighted again.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: I8b0fb667b44b324529d4c45c39bf21573517f989
`OO.ui.PageLayout.prototype.setActive` explains that the "active"
state only makes sense for a case we don't support, when a booklet
layout is used in non-continuous mode.
Change-Id: Ib5ddd605f29e82ebc85b833ac96b70ff4c95e502
Most of setPage's side-effects are redundant and can be skipped when
reselecting an item which already the current selection—except for
scrolling, which is useful to perform every time, for example when
clicking on the already-selected sidebar item.
Bug: T294348
Change-Id: I90ba14817e5536ac018eb70102f657f29a29644d
This was using the currentPage from the StackLayout. It will not
be updated there anymore.
Also removing the line about focus after toggle. We do not want
that anymore afaik.
Bug: T312015
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I8b6eedd580d49604014118171c6da62849752d53
Tabbing into the parameter select list should highlight the first
parameter, but focusing a checkbox by clicking it to uncheck should
not trigger this highlighting.
Copied from the superclass method.
Bug: T312014
Change-Id: Ia1fd450bad4861eb2815ca21eae69ee31e40ac08
Only works with changes in OOUI core. See https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/oojs/ui/+/753987
Depends-On: Ie822dc87bc5748985de5637cb35f1940837f64d3
Bug: T299036
Change-Id: Idaccc7c95d67abe14621eabb7725ba07e449ab1e
New sidebar events take a `soft` parameter allowing reuse between
"hard" and "soft" selection and parameter add. The "hard" variant
causes a content-pane focus.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: Ic49718840ae56eb4cfab01ce964a2fbc2d8db63b
More idempotent approach to state change, using a common function
that has all the side-effects.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: I13e64ff5262295a60c28572855cfe36da7c3ff41
This becomes the canonical method to call when we want to update the
template dialog to select a new item.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: Ie7880bfde41b77f0e6367cc8e3a78edb299391ce
Call the handler directly. This avoids the `set` event handling for
add and remove parameters, causing minor behavior changes:
Moves the "reselect" logic after removing pages, from StackLayout to
the two-pane layout class.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: I46454d184d4718bed45caf9f41487364611f1f44
This event makes other calls redundant because it's always sent from
setPage and onReplacePart.
Bug: T311296
Change-Id: If214a713ed7299320d499c3e5687eda013fe0aab
In an important use case (spacebar selection of sidebar parts), the
content pane selection isn't updated. This patch switches to read
the sidebar selection rather than the content pane selection.
Bug: T311296
Change-Id: I684a9edf04b6615cc840bbb89e8c1d03a0ab8e94
If nothing has been selected, the action buttons should be
initialized in a disabled state.
Bug: T311608
Change-Id: I32fee0d73f6e13e09dc421c944df73b79e0260bb
No longer need to manage the connection between outline items and
content pane pages.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I8dae7efa18e97ce5e1c84d963f1a32f09dd7e7cb
It seems that the controls widget was the only side-effect we still
needed for maintaining existing behavior.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I507dacef4e56946b836b0fca31effce611260aec
This patch does a few closely related things:
* Replace a direct dialog → sidebar access with dialog → layout →
sidebar.
* Move the misplaced removeButton.toggle() to a more appropriate
place.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I5a2802aab587a6f7de4681bce4e9961a064ef8ee
We're not implementing a search widget with results anymore. It's
a leftover from the cleanup after feature flags got removed.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: I9c177ae92a7d3e13a4fff248a6c86f1aab89f82c
The original intend of that rule was not clear to me and it seems
it got dragged along for some time. I checked the DOM in the
collapsed state to see where this could even apply in the new
interface and found no other place than the one where we overwrite
it again.
I guess it can go away.
Change-Id: I2886db33c5f06d1c49acc4743c9acc198339de36
These are internal to the two-pane layout and sidebar, so the dialog
doesn't need to be involved.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I5f05bc119dc213d8e31db62a3808a2fadaf35d99
This is a direct follow-up to I7f22e4b. I found that the way the
margins have been arranged became a little more complicated with
I7f22e4b. This patch tries to go back to the – I think – simpler way
it was done before.
It should look the same as before down to the pixel.
Bug: T311223
Change-Id: I2c7789922078fa98f15f0b65de4c0efdf878a13a
The one usage of this wasn't working. FIXME: maybe we want to
restore the behavior, to focus the first parameter in the dialog
after opening.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ibe0151fbedb3a9716bb231b5d398c4ae670fd667
This defaults to false. It looks like this default is used in the
MWTemplateDialog base class. However, it also looks like this base
class is never used on it's own. All users we know use the subclass
MWTransclusionDialog where "editable" is true.
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=%2C%5Cs*ve%5C.ui%5C.MWT(emplate%7Cransclusion)Dialog&files=%5C.js%24
In the process I also remove some comments that literally repeat the
code and don't add any knowledge because of this.
Bug: T310867
Change-Id: Ie245aab80d1e77a8406f5591062e9cf49fd9613f
This code was meant to select the first parameter of a template the
moment it is added. It's at least partly broken because it doesn't
consider the so called "prompted" parameters that have been added
just a few lines above. It's a questionable feature anyway. We are
going to refine all focus-related behavior anyway. Let's remove this
broken stuff and reimplement it later (probably in a different place)
when we continue working on this.
The FIXME was added in I720ce1a.
Bug: T311223
Change-Id: I1801efe38387b5e7a1b76417c1e5d7db4e4b96d0
This was done in 3 rather "random" places:
1. Whenever a template is manually added. But rather late, after the
template was added, in an event handler that is about focus
behavior. It should not continue to manipulate the template that
was just added.
2. When the dialog opens with a template preloaded by name, as it is
done from the citation menu.
3. When the dialog is about to finish loading.
This patch fixes 2 issues:
* Get rid of a duplicate call (number 2 and 3) when using the
citation menu.
* Move number 1 to a place where it's executed much earlier, and
only when the user clicks "add template" in a template placeholder.
There is no other way to add a template to an existing transclusion,
but it's still a more appropriate place I feel.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I8a65ad703b95ba2092e9ef73493e9903e96b0dd6
This still works for a dialog with just the template placeholder,
because the page is already chosen as "current" in the stackLayout.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ibc1d33b02d34f70548d9f7365e085847ef0b2a51
Includes moving CSS that already moved from the TemplateDialog CSS
file to the DialogLayout LESS file.
Width and height had no effect. Neither on desktop/mobile. I guess
the control's height covers for that. Float could be removed due to
the flex layout.
Some more specific rules could cover for the !important overrides.
Change-Id: I7f22e4be37c8f227845aed97281faefe26241091
This causes one small behavior change: when deleting one of several
wikitext transclusions or a part following a template without
parameters, the selection would previously be set to the *previous*
part, and now it's the *next* part. This is arguably more consistent
with the behavior when removing eg. templates with parameters, after
which the next part is selected.
Doesn't affect removing parameters.
TODO: We might want to restore the already-broken behavior to focus
the first parameter of a newly-inserted template.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ic5f47e31512d1a3949caf60613bd05b9a3bdf478
This place is much better in so far that it much more obviously gives
us the guarantee that the sidebar and the content pane are always in
sync.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I01a7914fcba5d573abb957d0e34fa895874bd94e
According to my test one of the two places where this property was
used is impossible to reach with the property set to false. This is
the one I remove in this patch.
This also removes a related method that is entirely unused.
Bug: T310867
Change-Id: I9579a5d894d60560cec77dad7f1e796f8dfca06f
Includes adding a less file for minerva layout rules. To make best
use of the less shortcuts and avoid duplication, some selectors
have been slightly changed. Outcome should still be identical.
Change-Id: I92179ecf6045c938cace0e7e809b7ad4cf035727
In some cases ve-ui-mwTransclusionDialog-newSidebar could just removed
when there are specific enough classes present so that we can be
sure to not overwrite rules outside our use case.
e.g with the new ve-ui-mwTwoPaneTransclusionDialogLayout-stackLayout
Note that this will also remove some right padding on descriptions
where it seems that it was applied for no reason.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: I6612fe1cb2ea6bd75e9bc3e6f4d6d8d0c4addc63
Leaves a reference in the TemplateDialog so that we can slowly
migrate the many usages.
Makes no other changes to how the sidebar is managed (yet!).
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I45403cd32e3adbe357ebad7bbc851f60d92751e5
The only event in use is "set". The others are never used. Which makes
sense. The driver for everything related to adding or removing parts
is the model. This widget is at the receiving end.
Bug: T310867
Change-Id: I4ef7e59ff05cb02aca59b76fdffa4f1fced76e33
It's never used in a different way. A lot of other code depends
heavily on this fact. Let's hard-code it.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: I65bbaea47341d74b49ce447c896eb2340f730e17
The method in the model (where it belongs) was added via Iaf28035 in
2016. The other via I073c585 in 2014.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: Idea322aec175600e3055a859ca987afc1fe6dd8c
This hasn't been necessary since ooui-js Id9cf086771, it was to prevent the
BookletLayout from scrolling to the top when removing the currently
selected item.
Reverts I0c1fddfa32b76621a9f1328c8173f0158386aee8
Change-Id: I5752fb273d0e2a3f0e7b6a044e69d68dc3e4b657
This was added via I3b792ff. It's about the old sidebar which isn't
accessible any more.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I29919285255a84bd58aa06ee1b2816d25a8112a6
This class was (accidentally?) removed in 2014 so the styles had
no effect since then. I decided on removing the code that was
unused for 8years. - Alternativly the class could be re-added but
I'm not sure if it makes sense.
See I4b2ba31bed5c4f80940623702d635cacd19e0a66 where this got lost.
Change-Id: Ifcbfc4273e41c08431c6f5b0ca2f2b6d25c34edd
Bring over the ES and Less implementation from ooui-js and rename to
fit it into the VE hierarchy, but don't make any other substantial
changes.
Inlines the wikimediaui-themed styles, ignoring apex styles, and
hardcodes the Less constants.
Bug: T310865
Change-Id: Id43dafdf11c5df0d7d78112e5f62a8599bdbc879
Technically the old BookletLayout sidebar is still there. But it's
never visible, effectively dead, and meant to be removed. This patch
just empties the OutlineItems of all template dialog related pages
without actually disabling the old sidebar.
Note this partly reverts Ie57f462.
Bug: T310859
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ic0b7d703f369045ed342426563f8eeb3e47046db
Value changes are triggerd and tracked from the parameter page and
change events will be forwared to the outline, if they are relevant.
Initial value is read from the model.
Bug: T308730
Change-Id: I0a3b0faf40aee44889404dcce31d850714360580
There are 3 ways to enter the dialog:
* Editing an existing template.
* Start empty.
* Start with a known template name.
The back button should only ever appear in one of the three modes.
The last mode is the one that's used in the Cite dialog.
Bug: T310602
Change-Id: Id23d3ac5e1715387c78916adeb8ca5f675005a5c
The outline item is only used by the new sidebar for the move and
remove flags it seems.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: Ia74e5b0e3dbf81e745137b181ed34a4d48dac42c
Parameters do not have an "OutlineItem" anymore so the code for
that was completely removed.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: Ie57f462b8fda4505b99ee5bc9d788908d18d9c64
Removing a class name that's going to be deleted from places where
it's not strictly needed, e.g. comments.
Bug: T307188
Change-Id: Ifb14695d05510d2c0e25623afa99c4e84af3aaf9
As this is a surface command, rather than a documentTrigger, pressing
escape will not close the editor if done elsewhere on the page, e.g.
in the site search bar, or an unrelated modal.
Move the logic to ArticleTarget as this could theoretically work
on the mobile site with a keyboard.
Allows us to remove some hacks around the ToolbarDialog that are no
longer necessary.
The command can also be used by the MWBackTool (which should be renamed)
and allows us to remove some custom logic from it.
Bug: T310694
Bug: T310695
Bug: T306763
Change-Id: I91ee6916a91d80d9872b3b44dad7eca55ad1acc4
Depends-On: I29f6af4cc7c71a63a6d1bafc53d16b9abd1b60ec
This patch adds top and bottom margins for each transclustion
part, excluding the top of the first element and the bottom
of the last if those are non-indended ones (ButtonWidget).
Bug: T309584
Change-Id: Ibdcf1293676bd59c7868f3d197805c8b9e743cdc
The testing phase for the implemented features is finished. So the
feedback link for the project can be removed.
Also added missing documentation for a message key used.
Bug: T307188
Change-Id: I2e2e4ff58d2bacda5ae841bcf6f418e786a3967e
For some use cases of the transclusion dialog such as Insert
Citation, the back button is inappropriate and we want to keep the
close box.
This partially reverts commit 2e2e40e76e.
Bug: T310602
Change-Id: If68a822c260618c0a93eb8d0c46d2b452fee8baa
I benchmarked the template dialog before and after the change made in
I0f35a19 with a large 200 part multi-part template. I measured only
the time spend in .updateSize().
Before I0f35a19: 3.6s
After: 4.6s
With this small fix here: 3.6s
Bug: T309875
Change-Id: I2c2892e173ba70c746fb71624c65b7f4ffde4419
I'm more in favor of leaving no garbage behind. The TODO with a date
is a good way of making sure this gets removed eventually.
This could have been part of Ie6eea76. The new code is added to the
same spot where the code removed in Ie6eea76 originally was.
Bug: T296471
Depends-On: Ie6eea76dacdc614ecb910c48e7e1f519b8c69322
Change-Id: Idec63201ff4aa52a0c53c6d007577a93c94e0ec0
The "mediaClass" property now only serves to capture the original class
found on the media so that it can be roundtripped without causing dirty
diffs. In the 2.4.0 version of Parsoid's output, that will still be
the usual Image/Audio/Video. As of 2.5.0, it will always be File and
the mediaClass property can be dropped.
Parsoid is currently forward compatible with serializing mw:File, so
edited or new media can use that type already.
The contextmenu item for media has been updated to make use of the
"mediaTag" instead of mediaClass to continue distinguishing media types.
That was the only place a grep of mediaClass turned up any use.
Bug: T273505
Change-Id: If5dc6b794dacd6973d3b2093e6b385591b91d539
This avoids a meaningless attirbute change with the image
is unmodified (as thumbUrl can be a different size).
Change-Id: Ib79a4703382552e38022a3f345ca5cd762c52303
This patch fixes a bug which causes long parameter descriptions to
be to non-collapsible when adding them from the sidebar-only view on
smaller screens.
Change-Id: If373587a9b2c3841ad6814f74bfcbf0c0f013488
This is done in preparation for Iac6205f to make it easier to review.
This patch here is meant to be a no-op that doesn't change anything,
just moves existing code around.
Bug: T307986
Change-Id: Ie6ccd9528e5799ba340fed344e1f47a443c2c51f
Follow-up for what was done in I37505af. I don't fully understand why
these two extras are sometimes needed and sometimes not. But this exact
combination of 3 properties is used in multiple places already, so
let's just do the same here.
Bug: T300008
Change-Id: I1eba5fc378475d365111add58a141c3114dc0118
This focuses on some scenarios that are
a) complex enough to be worth a test,
b) but simple enough so I don't need to spend hours on comming up
with a test setup. ;-)
This patch also simplifies the ARIA related code in
MWTransclusionOutlinePartWidget a bit.
* Check 1 of the 3 ARIA configs only. Only having one is already
helpful and should not be skipped.
* No need for the large conditional. setAriaDescribedBy() works fine
with undefined.
Bug: T291157
Change-Id: I142782ec9b96147de64497f4f6a373eae05b9c8e
Will implicitly set a max width for the button due to the margin.
Long words will break in the middle of the word.
Also includes a shorter label.
Bug: T300008
Change-Id: I37505af8383d8c0c2bd4af3987ec5e2a3049688a
Will be removed when parameters are added. Needs different margins
depending on beeing shown in the single transclusion mode without
header or on multiple transclusions.
Bug: T300710
Change-Id: Ieb95d7276aa4d4b0fcbb74f87ab734e4a393dc21
Before, the fallback algorithm was somewhat adaptive, trying harder and
harder the fewer CirrusSearch results have been found. This updated
algorithm guarantees that 10 results are shown.
Warning: You might see only 9 results. The reason is a bogus, unrelated
behavior in the mw.widgets.TitleWidget in core that's used as a base
class here. There is a "showMissing" option that's apparently enabled
by default, and prepends a non-existing title from the main namespace,
ignoring the "namespace" option. This extra result from the wrong
namespace is later dropped by the very same widget.
This code here sees 10 results before the bogus one is dropped.
Disabling "showMissing" causes other issues. We would need a series (?)
of custom hacks to work around all this, but this seems inappropriate.
Let's live with 9 for the moment.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I2c577c9ef2752b6c6cd360f4023e151e9272fcd5
The main advantage of this change is that it drops the assumption
that the index starts with 1. This is not necessarily the case when
we prepend extra search results. Dropping this assumption here allows
to simplify such code.
* The incoming list of pages is guaranteed to be an array.
* There is no point (any more) that could cause the array to become
sparse.
* Note we still make a copy of the `origPages` array at some point,
e.g. on `.filter()`.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: Ifbd92bb052155c613d2ca21ab6d54a0b3ef28c0c
This option is not only buggy (it just doesn't work when the namespace
option is set the same time), it is not useful in this context even
if it would work. It doesn't make much sense to suggest non-existing
templates in the context of the template dialog. If adding a
non-existing template really is what the user wants, they can still do
this by simply typing the name of the template and submitting the form.
We never need this to show up in the suggester below the input field.
The main advantage of this change is that is saves 1 useless API
request that's potentially done every time a key is pressed.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I903340a06d6e6490bb58f628f41903aa044ccb21
This separates the two steps:
1. See if items in the list of `origPages` miss their `.index`
property, and add it if possible.
2. Later code doesn't need to care about redirects any more.
Note that `origPages` is not used for anything else. And even if,
it's not wrong to have the index for each search result on both the
redirect and the redirect target.
Change-Id: I12135f0430c944b4e33c49ece7779d7c3bb6c211
This is not a pageid, but a simple numeric index in an array. Luckily
it doesn't make a practical difference for this particluar way of
iterating something.
Change-Id: I7ec9ace00d4fba7adde17670058a0365b30f5617
The result is guaranteed to be in formatversion=2, where the list of
pages is an array, not an object.
Change-Id: Ic73a68c3e249a70108a6a19a89f4ff6c475794ed
This was added to make the context a bit more consistent
with the regular link inspector, however with I2fec865570
we making these delete buttons strictly mobile only.
Change-Id: I52936919e332aee851ccd11a862367c97eb41b39
This code is optimized for the 2 most relevant use cases:
1. When Cirrus finds 10 results, we still want to search for the top 1
prefix match. This is critical for templates like !!. This will appear
at the top. unshiftPages() makes sure the limit of 10 is enforced.
2. When Cirrus fails to find anything, we search for 10 prefix matches
and use these instead.
The code can also handle everything in between. For example, when
Cirrus finds 5 results, we search for 5 more prefix matches and add
them when Cirrus missed them. The total number in the end might be 5 to
10 depending on the number of duplicates. This is intentional. Why?
Let's say we always search for 10 prefix matches and add them to the
top when Cirrus missed them. This might remove _all_ Cirrus results.
This shouldn't happen. This extra code is only to fill in glaring gaps,
not to replace Cirrus. 5 results are fine.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: Ib0471795124c0c7001b6901edaf8e7b380e426b1
There is already some kind of "fallback" to prefixsearch. We always
check if the top-1 prefixsearch result is part of the result set.
Because of this the current worst-case scenario is that only this
1 result is shown.
This patch implements a full fallback to prefixsearch. But only when
there are 0 CirrusSearch results. Further tuning might be done in
later patches.
Bug: T304925
Change-Id: I1927eedad60c9b9ac2021481a85376c08ccf6fdb
In detail:
* Just compare strings where possible. Sometimes the first character
alone is distinct enough.
* Add missing ^ anchor to avoid possibly running unbound pattern
searches. This is not strictly necessary when we know the input is
fixed-length. Still I find it more robust and more obvious what it's
meant to do. Not to "search for some match somewhere" but to check if
the input _is_ a match.
Change-Id: I9b7651d8ec1266521c22b38ccabb95a947903f72
.test() is the dedicated syntax for a boolean "does match? yes/no?"
check. .match() returns an array of matches, or null. This is just not
needed in these situations.
Change-Id: Ibb996ab843d1a6c7d7af98d6a112990665d543b2
We ended mixing two concepts in a single method:
* We need a method that allows us to create the parameter list widget
when it's needed, even if it's empty. This is relevant when a template
is entirely empty, and the first parameter is added. This wasn't
working. Instead the parameter list was created with all parameters.
* On initialization we either want all parameters to be shown, or only
used ones. But this code is only needed once, on initialization. I
ended inlining this code in this patch.
Bug: T300640
Bug: T304046
Change-Id: I6620a870e4420dcb8fecf522b3274458eeec891d
