If editor loading was aborted while the surface was already being set up,
this code would cause the following exception:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'tools' of null
Introduced in c02c529537 (2017) because
our coding conventions at the time demanded that all `var` statements
must appear at the beginning of a function.
Bug: T287487
Change-Id: Id657d6f1e1189c17ede25362f145bb7b10f441db
With this users can also filter undocumented parameters
that they added to an empty starting template.
Bug: T272481
Change-Id: I99adb38b0ae4d4ade91fcb506f10c0222b9bb5e8
Note that this patch alone probably does not make that much
sense. The code executed is pretty much the same. The only
difference is that the empty (!) …ContainerWidget is kept
and re-filled with what might be a completely different
template.
This is not much of a difference to before when the
container was recreated.
This change will make more sense when the container has to
manage more state, e.g. focus states. This state will
survive then.
Change-Id: Ic336d10a595e3e222741a3dc57c1d54639166b7a
This ellipsis was there before we started working on this code,
but was never working properly.
We understand that the CSS was intentionally done like this (as
the comment explains). However:
* We changed the width of the dialog. The old value doesn't
match any more.
* The width is different when the sidebar is expanded vs. when
it is collapsed. Even if we update the number, it won't
always work.
* The 100% work fine in current browsers. I can only assume
this was different back in 2014 when this CSS was written
(see Ia8259e9).
Bug: T285044
Change-Id: I3de2b0ed0b6a05d2b9fa0b325a2b12277564b271
Notably:
* Don't require the model in the new sidebar via dependency
injection, but connect the event handlers later. This is
relevant because we currently create the new sidebar in the
wrong spot. Removing the hard dependency allows us to split
the code and utilize initialize() and getSetupProcess()
correctly. This will be done in a following patch.
* The change event now includes the new position. This makes
it very easy to add this missing feature to the new sidebar.
Also:
* Stop triggering change events when nothing changed. These
events are expensive. They bubble all the way up to the
TransclusionModel, and to all linked
onTransclusionModelChange() handlers.
* Update event documentation to make this more visible.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: Iafe29f18a6fed14d9c3124c9756aa840886afbbc
Notably:
* Include parameter aliases, labels and descriptions in the
search.
* Don't use a possibly outdated search index, but live data.
* Clear filter when a new checkbox is added.
Bug: T272481
Change-Id: Ie90a803af6178a8bb6de370a0f8e079800d9f8a2
In detail:
* Allow clicks on all elements in the new sidebar. This should
focus the corresponding element on the right.
* Make all elements in the new sidebar tabbable.
* Fix MWTransclusionOutlineTemplateWidget.createCheckbox() to
not need a temporary param object any more.
* Rewrite more code in MWTransclusionOutlineTemplateWidget to
be shorter and easier to read.
* Fix MWTemplateModel.addParameter() to not do way to much
stuff when a parameter already exists.
* Update code documentation.
* Use more specific, less ambiguous variable and method names.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: Iaf6f7d1b0f7bf0e9b03eb86d01f3eceadece6fe4
Clicks on the left side now focus elements on the right
side.
This patch also simplifies the …ContainerWidget constructor.
The config parameter should only be used for "OOUI things"
that are needed by subclasses and mixins. But the parameters
we have here are not "UI things".
Passing them as config passes them to classes where we don't
know what they do with it. What probably happens is that
some class keeps a reference to the entire config object,
which doesn't have a benefit and possibly blocks garbage
collection.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I0c0e4a1ba59dcb43141338ffe939c9c6783e000d
Actually reusing this OOUI mixin gives us a lot of well
developed functionality we need anyway. Most notably proper
event management, e.g. click events.
The number of CSS properties we need to override is managable,
I would argue. Let's see:
* Our buttons are not inline-elements, but should use the full
width.
* No focus-border left and right for the same reason.
* We want much more inner padding.
* We want a stronger hover effect.
* We need to fine-tune the position of the icon. This is
because of the inner padding.
* Need to get rid of a negative margin that's only relevant
for inline-buttons.
I currently feel like the benefits are worth living with
slightly more brittle code. Note that we can undo this change
any time because all this is well encapsulated in this new
class.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I33f275a958964d49e803e56bf74a6fa961093da1
