I found this error in our logstash. I was not able to find an
existing Phabricator ticket.
Note how line #348 extracts the last element from the
$siblings array. It uses the function end() there, which
returns false in case the array is empty. $siblings[0] can't
do this but yields an error.
An alternative is to use reset(), which can return false as
well. But that's not really better. Especially not better
readable, I would argue.
Change-Id: Ic90cd2392ede15078ba0d5b4d67b8dc5d05f9bf7
* Ignore rendering-transparent nodes between discussion comments.
* Improve isRenderingTransparentNode() so that <link> nodes
representing TemplateStyles are not considered transparent,
otherwise this would undo ae920b831f.
Using a regexp from Parsoid.
Bug: T272746
Change-Id: I0b3c3251156ba6c4826abf5ba44ea93f80ebc01d
Splits the cache on the reply links feature being enabled
for a particular user and title.
An additional check is done after parsing in case the user
has the feature enabled via query string or cookie.
Bug: T267404
Depends-On: I883a37fd67108243e7a20683b1a5d59fd0f6e39f
Change-Id: I3bc06ca7d4aea7f0fe39eef0e77ad88d1f9c1043
Add yet another tree walking utility: CommentUtils::linearWalk().
Unlike TreeWalker, it allows handling the beginnings and ends of nodes
separately – kind of like parsing a XML token stream, or kind of like
VisualEditor's linear model.
(Add unit tests for this utility. The simple.html test case is copied
from [VisualEditor/VisualEditor]/demos/ve/pages/simple.html.)
Use this utility to stop skipping when we reach either a closing or
opening block node tag. Previously we'd skip over such tags inside
nested "transparent" nodes (like <a>, <del>, or apparently <font>).
Bug: T271385
Change-Id: I201a942eb3a56335e84d94e150ec2c33f8b4f4e0
The tool may go in and out of beta as new features
are release/graduated to opt-out. Users should only
need to opt in to the beta feature once to get all
future sub-features.
Bug: T272071
Change-Id: If6834b7fc07fc7e84757dc5fdcea814cd0d65936
Don't assume a feature is available because the code has
loaded and the user option is set. Export the logic from
Hooks.php to the client.
Change-Id: Ica0e58de7ed0d59e3b09645193eb2b691ae41c39
If DiscussionToolsABTest is enabled (set to `all` or a feature), logged
in users who have never used the tool before will be assigned to an a/b
test bucket. If they're in the test bucket, they get the feature
enabled.
If they manually set their beta feature preference, we don't override
that but do maintain their bucket for logging purposes.
Bug: T268191
Change-Id: I9c4d60e9f9aaef11afa7f8661b9c49130dde3ffa
1. Extend the JS modifier to allow adding top-level comments
(that is, replies to headings). PHP modifier doesn't do this
because we'll save the changes using paction=addtopic instead.
2. Subclass CommentController to allow adding a new heading and a
top-level comment underneath it at the same time.
3. A lot of ugly code in ReplyWidget to customize the interface
for this case. Much of it should probably be moved to
CommentController/NewTopicController.
Bug: T267595
Change-Id: I9c707bb7f7aae1b92c72fb4dee436490f8c8409b
Allows for multiple features in the near future.
Separate availability and enabled.
Separate User/Title/Output checks.
Change-Id: I454bd8407675749d93ff3d2b4c5d624b433204db
As a result of 0fc71f60cd, "empty" text
nodes (containing only whitespace) at the end of the comment may be
inside the comment's range, and trying to ignore them caused the
ranges not to match and the frame not to be detected.
Now the code works whether they're inside the comment's range or not.
Add a test case for wrapped discussion comments with HTML comments and
with whitespace.
Bug: T250126
Bug: T268407
Change-Id: I2217ff5a635fd1c9c9e803f46795b1bfb3d17535
Now we don't require the ParserOutput to be available.
As a result, we now check the flag on the latest revision of the page,
rather than the one being viewed.
Change-Id: Id77a332643cb8ad95afc5cec6713fa0a3636a5ce
While working on T270009, I noticed that <style> and <link> nodes
are treated differently, which seemed weird. Rewrite this again,
hopefully this is the last time.
The changed test cases also involve <area> and <input> nodes,
and the new results make more sense to me.
Bug: T264116
Change-Id: I3af90c84768a4b3dc53446927f4dba6f72175a2f
We've recently decided that we want to "extend" comments until
the end of the paragraph (e36dc8e78a,
d0ae6c4e44).
However, we still had this special case that did the opposite: it
ensured that if a comment ended in the middle of a text node, the
comment would not be extended to the end of the node. Remove it.
Note the change in the test file signatures-funny-formattedreply.html,
which actually covered this case specifically.
Change-Id: Id1384bb0c6e1a5f0c70f55efcb4caa240f230f07
The end marker is skipped forward until an open or close
block tag is reached. In tree traversal terms this means
moving either to the next sibling, or the parent (to skip
over close tags).
Bug: T256033
Change-Id: Iaa2c588698790d576ac4f9ecc126f58a082ef6b3
