Note this doesn't fully solve T374068. The issue is probably that the
reuse tab shouldn't be visible in the first place. Still I think this
is a useful safe-guard that cannot hurt. We are doing the same in
almost all other places already.
Bug: T374068
Change-Id: I9b91374dbda74af75d8c36e24ffe5b9448da1aa7
I could add some simplifications to reduce the complexity of the
tests a bit. I also fixed the test for the change handler. Seems
it did not work that way before.
Also some minor random doc fixes.
Change-Id: If1530a815ea126c38c3a55f3d52e3ca482059840
In a document without references, the default group doesn't exist.
Make sure that we don't assume any group's existence.
Bug: T373661
Change-Id: I1bfd41b0b61938f32219d61142cd576c8ca97ace
Looking for other references can (as of now) never work in source
mode. There are never other references or reference lists.
Bug: T373661
Change-Id: Icaad4e71a1538c5fad6a0f016b342a7cb7b9db2f
Patch I83434afaf1b76425bddb575dd724f462a247c83d was meant to be a
revert of I3749683d8a18e502bf16e5bd5f2fe385581625be, but left this
unused message behind.
While an unused message is harmless, it's of no use either. Even if
we are going to re-implement something like this again in the future,
we will certainly not be able to use this exact message (mostly
because of T373307). Starting with a new message is much easier then.
Bug: T373564
Change-Id: I241d44639ca7112e8398d095e7aa59cf8e275da1
This message was added via Icf9ea348cd97bdb09ddf18769f53c01ea5a8b7ef,
merged 2013-06-15.
The code of the ReferenceDialog class was later largely rewritten
and split into two separate "Edit" and "Insert" dialogs.
See Ib244ff6ad9b4cee1decfd9b9e1d3d4e9cdcfb78c, merged 2013-06-28.
Since then the message is unused. The commit message mentions the
related change. The patch just forgot to remove the message.
Note: The two separate dialog classes have been merged back into
the original ReferenceDialog class.
See I8265febf4fd8f64d2ac40470ff033bac68b24d99, merged 2013-07-18.
The message is already unused at this point. This just makes the
Git history extra confusing.
Bug: T373564
Change-Id: Ifb71a243fbdac43d2199ad40d84da14333d42599
This makes the dialog's behavior much more robust, especially when
confronted with overly long and complex references.
* Limit the height of list items to avoid the situation where a
single item overflows the dialog. This makes it especially hard
to navigate with the cursor keys. We can't see any more what's
going on. The proposed height is intentionally a very high upper
bound, equivalent to about 2/3 of the dialog's height.
* Limit the name on the right side to take up less than half of an
item. The left side is for the content. Usually the names are very
short anyway. But if a name is long it currently creates a mess
where the name is intertwined with the content.
* Break overly long words in references.
* Changing the opacity to use upstream values makes the dimmed names
a bit darker. I think this is good, even necessary for legibility.
Technical changes:
* Use LESS variables from upstream, where possible.
* Remove redundant `relative` already set upstream.
Bug: T372385
Change-Id: Ie59b7b7e4aa7eadc8f82b39884313f5aa8cfd950
I think that the message is more clear when it starts with the
subject we're describing. That also seems to be the case in other
messages here.
It also aligns with the wording in referenceslist-missing-parent:
"There are subreferences with a missing parent reference."
Bug: T372871
Change-Id: If9a49faccb6cbe2000b15a2d28bd66565cce0e90
Pushes per-group knowledge down into a structured object and give it
an interface, separated from the singleton cache across all groups.
Also changes the behavior of orphaned subrefs so that they're still
rendered as subrefs, with an error placeholder where the parent
should be.
Bug: T372871
Change-Id: I84e679a8365f3fbfabaf344d99f56f6d069c0776
Based on the mobile version evaluation in task T370876, indentation is aligned for subrefs in the reflist for mobile view to match the web version
Bug: T371666
Change-Id: I40a3fe0b9cc607365e0ead26cf554921fe0abc5b
