They were defaulted to false with
I93ad51ffe7bee597d2d127f4c5d6b2929ffc8f7e, which broke use cases where
the page field is NOT required, nor has a 'required' => false explicitly
declared.
Bug: T194425
Change-Id: I5ab768c02a30b6d053104e590729ef22bb4e0808
Pretty self-explanatory and straightforward, since recentchanges has a
dedicated column for bot edits.
Bug: T193994
Change-Id: I76d41e082aed262640e9fff856eeb97df49633d5
With If16975dd394cfdb3c57ff263366c2fc865de362a I broke flags checkboxes,
i.e. the one for enabling/deleting/etc. a filter. In fact, I
misunderstood the way cbReadOnlyAttribute was used (a dirty way,
actually) and this caused such checkboxes not to be disabled if the user
didn't have rights to edit the filter.
Change-Id: Ibf80b54e0f620734ad7767e4769a93bbf1feccff
Like we do for built-in values. If a blacklisted variable is overridden,
it still works, but there's no reason to allow it.
Bug: T191715
Change-Id: Ia4d42ec56dc4805454b96c52c2eace1924f6536c
Quite self-explanatory. If the talk page is blocked, a sentence is
added, otherwise it remains as it is. Plus, improved the way messages
are generated and reduced their reuse.
Bug: T193692
Change-Id: I01f5113ca586b94c25e1102c73d158ebb01c5a4b
The $deadActions array is populated but never used. At first I thought
it was about actions which aren't available, but this isn't right.
Instead, it's only used to keep track of available actions which aren't
used in the current filter. Which is some data that we don't need, nor
there's nothing we may do with that.
Bug: T188181
Change-Id: Ibdfeb92ccd790c0b1a4d79b382b053b9361459f8
We used to display the checkbox to block talk without checking if
it was defined. This caused a warning and an empty space with
wgBlockAllowsUTEdit set to false.
Change-Id: I97f82633e932de7e325615473c85245a406a55ef
After Id4dc1debf0240d5b336f4d9ab5b363c240f08807, the method has been
moved, and in doing that I forgot to change this line.
Change-Id: I20caf06f2c568605bd6a90c9cf2b425cd51512e7
Like we did for other links in /diff and /histories, there are some
links that we'd better display as OOUI buttons. Also, use the Html
class' specific method to show errorboxes.
Bug: T132284
Change-Id: If67035991a0835ec3edc13be4543e6b40c76c3ea
I'd like to have this reviewed by more than one user before merging, to avoid regressions of annoying typos.
Change-Id: I91a9c5cca55e540a6c95b750579c1c369a760b15
I found these vulnerabilities while trying to setup seccheck. Although
I'm not sure whether seccheck recognised them, I'm sure that they exist
since I did manual tests, and it's possible to inject custom scripts
with these.
Change-Id: I97804be8352a1b784d483195edb29e363a0c616e
'disallow' rules with a missing first parameters are perfectly fine (and
quite common), so don't throw notices when that happens.
This broke Flow's unit tests, and caused exceptions for all api.php
edits that triggered a 'disallow' rule.
Change-Id: Ibebedb566da705e77ffb831ebda6476adba07c93
This seems like the logical way to be sure that multiple mass actions
won't be counted as one, thus reaching the conditions limit. I tried to
test this locally, but I actually had troubles to simply replicate the
issue of the reached limit in a stable manner, so I'm not totally sure.
Anyway, this shouldn't do any harm.
Bug: T193374
Change-Id: Icdc172f76705870ee502339a53e912e15a3bd31d
The variable was declared in the "if" branch but also used in the "else"
one. This caused the rules textarea to not have the readonly attribute
if the user wasn't allowed and CodeEditor wasn't installed.
Change-Id: I2bf69dc0f2d24efac41d1ac6100ed7e286e3afa4
This is taken from I6a57a28f22600aafb2e529587ecce6083e9f7da4 and makes
all the needed changes to make phan pass. Seccheck will instead fail,
but since it's not clear how to fix it (and it is non-voting), for the
moment we may merge this and enable phan on IC.
Bug: T192325
Change-Id: I77648b6f8e146114fd43bb0f4dfccdb36b7ac1ac
I wrongly wrote that it's used for strings, while it actually accepts
any kind of argument. Also, specified the used operator.
Change-Id: I6d3545517a83f56f7393a1d1f99ce61d480e333d
I added on MW an example of comparison with empty array, which we should
keep inside the dedicated test as well.
Change-Id: Ifa4bca85c8978ef24ed5bb26787730bb4521261f
