They're simply the same as the corresponding right- message, but
starting with a lowercase letter.
Bug: T220812
Change-Id: I0dd31cb1cd5d34a2333a3b2341bc060f28c9162e
These are specific tests for storeVarDump and loadVarDump, both alone
and in the context of running filters.
Also, include disabled variables in the VariableHolder object if they're
saved in the DB.
Bug: T201193
Depends-On: Ia5c477edc8733bb1994cb6d01e1371ed496c8bcb
Change-Id: I5e35d773904a62105767ce6d7d962ab5525c2d12
The root cause is database rows holding a serialized revision object
(awful, right?), and to properly fix it we need a maintenance script,
still WIP (T213006).
This temp fix is to avoid flooding the exception channel.
Bug: T187153
Change-Id: I062934091fbd6213cf9bc10e8ad6864ce6a58254
And right when the throttle script seemed complete... Here is another
function! So, this change splits the logic in new functions called
sequentially, and the only actual change is adding the beautifyHistory
function. Its purpose is to search ANY row in abuse_filter_history with
empty/missing parameters and normalize it. More specifically, missing
period and count are inserted as 0, and for missing groups we add
"none", used by a newly introduced message. This way, messages shown on
Special:AbuseFilter/history will be clearer and won't have gaps.
Bug:T209565
Bug:T215787
Change-Id: I38395f4df9d83badfd26cdf584ffba743b6417a9
If the User passed to $logEntry->setPerformer() represents a creatable
username, then it has to actually exist so the actor row can be created.
Bug: T188327
Change-Id: Iab2fc9593a020ffacd219d644103d685028e3336
Having a single return statement inside a function isn't always the
best, but having 5 is probably worse. This patch changes three long
if-return/if-return/... to a single if/elseif + return.
Change-Id: I5f4603627c61cf1b93859fe6bcd952eac8e82359
Short explanation on phab. Ace stops at the first regex match, so we
must use a function to specify the token type.
Bug: T219593
Change-Id: If7e6e98de81ce7e1be334732518425c8115e4aea
Mostly delete result files and assume the result is always true. The few
exceptions were either moved to standalone test, or inverted.
Change-Id: I6c06e596587750c4ebaabafbd277bc75eeb436a5
We JOIN integer and text, so Postgres would always fail on these. As
mentioned in the task description, this is only a temporary solution
(although a clean and durable one), while the long-term one is
I7460a2d63f60c2933b36f8383a8abdbba8649e12.
Bug: T42757
Change-Id: Ifddd0bca1e8eaa7c70511fb0d0588457b4fd0669
The reasoning is similar to the one of the parent patch (Ia5c477edc8733bb1994cb6d01e1371ed496c8bcb). Plus, it records runtime metrics on action different than edits, as there's no reason not to do it.
No performance issues in production.
Bug: T191039
Depends-On: Ia5c477edc8733bb1994cb6d01e1371ed496c8bcb
Change-Id: Ib1112e2fefd0631550d386ba87e5f87db84c3036
This variable was introduced to selectively enable profiling because
stats recording was bad for performance. Nowadays, stats are recorded in
a deferredupdate and don't harm performance anymore. Thus, this variable
can be removed and profiling be enabled by default.
Bug: T191039
Depends-On: Ib5fdeb75c1324f672b4ded39681f006fde34b4d1
Change-Id: Ia5c477edc8733bb1994cb6d01e1371ed496c8bcb
The method is used to make afl_deleted = null treated as afl_deleted =
0. Digging into code history, I found that it's in place because:
*In rEABF14b850f891de27ea09a1439e3835f66c49ad773f the afl_deleted field
was introduced as NULL, and wasn't used.
*In rEABFfe39e38282fc4c7903eb3f8080dbf0bab0f697f4 it was ALTERed to be
"NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"
*And in rEABFa2ead8bfb5166e0b354f3bb3e09f39795cb5b1c0 this function was
introduced to "negate the need for a schema change".
However, when ALTERing afl_deleted to be NOT NULL DEFAULT 0, all NULL
values have been automatically converted to 0 thanks to the DEFAULT
clause, and being the column NOT NULL, of course no NULL are still
there... The ALTER was applied to all wikis (in 2010), so afl_deleted is
NOT NULL everywhere and we can safely treat it as such.
Change-Id: Iebd843629d26e392d2e24efc2795c767e854897a
Follow-up of I1721a3ba532d481e3ecf35f51099c1438b6b73b2. This is the only
wrong replacement: strict checking will let 5 / 0.0 pass, with
unexpected results. Adding a regression test for it, too.
Change-Id: I25dbe9fafa92fd9a11bd8bc6ab8e66f305b8d48e
