To generate an OOUI-friendly array with dropdown values, we need to
rearrange the array we already get from AbuseFilter::getBuilderValues().
Right now we do it in a pretty dirty way, which also causes errors if
external values (e.g. Flow variables) are in the list. With this patch,
such conversion is simplified, explained in a comment, and doesn't
output errors anymore.
Change-Id: I1063865aeff2dfb637e95d7b2ff30da39ceeab67
Html::warningBox makes use of Html::rawElement, where as noted in docblock the given html must *not* be escaped. Plus, bold text was broken due to escaping.
This reverts commit 7dfe4bfcfd.
Change-Id: I505be036291d4c6ff33c0c4fed4dd83a5bb56c54
This fixes the following minor issues:
* In HistoryPager's getQueryInfo, afh_id was listed twice
* In AbuseFilter::translateFromHistory a field named "af_" was produced
if no actions were in use
* The topnav link "Recent filter changes" wasn't STRONGed on pages like
"Special:AbuseFilter/history/123"
* In checkAllFilters and AbuseFilter::getFilter, select from DB only the
fields that will be used.
* Simplify some inline comments and remove superfluous ones
Change-Id: If72b18bedac5e580487406e696aea1fd172ae45b
Trying to write unit tests, there are some things in the code that make
it not well testable. Here, two of them are corrected:
1 - Use class constants instead of static variables inside a non-static
method. Otherwise such variables won't be reset between tests. The
change is made so that there'll be less impact on blame.
2 - Set af_enabled to true even in af_deleted is true as well. For three
reasons: the first is that we already perform validation for this, so no
need to secretly change the option to whatever we think would make
sense. Second, this redundant validation makes some tests fail. Third:
this way, if the user selects both enabled and deleted, when the warning
is shown he'll indeed see that both checkboxes are selected. Before, he
would only see wpFilterEnabled as selected.
Change-Id: Ib7a0335fa7fb3b8a21765438a720205656c1ea09
Actually, it seems like I almost got it right at the first try. I tested
every validation scenario and it worked as espected, so ready for
review.
Bug: T193596
Change-Id: I7fd1798030d83292ce46543e25c0c431ec345a28
This way, we can specify an action and it'll return only conditions for
that specific action. This is especially thought to make results
filterable by action type.
Change-Id: I2c51b695262b132a5c7cdfab20d56e36f43c7448
Now the required need will be abusefilter-modify OR
abusefilter-view-private for /tools, /test and /examine.
Bug: T193903
Change-Id: I3f1a91a2cc1df2272e5d4099cefd7c649a0683d5
The conversion to OOUI brought some extra whitespace that creates some
problems while viewing the page, especially with specific skins. This
patch compacts four different form fields in a single one, having the
side benefit of reducing the amount of used variables.
Bug: T189425
Change-Id: I75aa83e36d12db65d8b54c76b3ea14c8c797215e
In If67035991a0835ec3edc13be4543e6b40c76c3ea I changed a couple of links
to OOUI buttons, but forgot to add one of these to the output (and to
enable OOUI as well).
Change-Id: I7dd4b554bae406bc0c8326867298302ee10b47f2
While the change itself is simple, the only problem here is the desing,
since we're adding even more vertical space with this.
Bug: T164108
Change-Id: Ic5373dd4f0b85dc1311d90ac165d4520ac956e68
With I91a9c5cca55e540a6c95b750579c1c369a760b15 we replaced some globals
with Config and, in doing this, we added "$config->has()" to check if a
variable was null. However, "has" will always return true even if the
value is null (it only checks if it exists), and thus we end up showing
a global abusefilter pager even if no central DB is set.
Bug: T195022
Change-Id: I751fdefd29b6af1361021d4343ba67f16c99a037
They were defaulted to false with
I93ad51ffe7bee597d2d127f4c5d6b2929ffc8f7e, which broke use cases where
the page field is NOT required, nor has a 'required' => false explicitly
declared.
Bug: T194425
Change-Id: I5ab768c02a30b6d053104e590729ef22bb4e0808
Pretty self-explanatory and straightforward, since recentchanges has a
dedicated column for bot edits.
Bug: T193994
Change-Id: I76d41e082aed262640e9fff856eeb97df49633d5
With If16975dd394cfdb3c57ff263366c2fc865de362a I broke flags checkboxes,
i.e. the one for enabling/deleting/etc. a filter. In fact, I
misunderstood the way cbReadOnlyAttribute was used (a dirty way,
actually) and this caused such checkboxes not to be disabled if the user
didn't have rights to edit the filter.
Change-Id: Ibf80b54e0f620734ad7767e4769a93bbf1feccff
The $deadActions array is populated but never used. At first I thought
it was about actions which aren't available, but this isn't right.
Instead, it's only used to keep track of available actions which aren't
used in the current filter. Which is some data that we don't need, nor
there's nothing we may do with that.
Bug: T188181
Change-Id: Ibdfeb92ccd790c0b1a4d79b382b053b9361459f8
We used to display the checkbox to block talk without checking if
it was defined. This caused a warning and an empty space with
wgBlockAllowsUTEdit set to false.
Change-Id: I97f82633e932de7e325615473c85245a406a55ef
After Id4dc1debf0240d5b336f4d9ab5b363c240f08807, the method has been
moved, and in doing that I forgot to change this line.
Change-Id: I20caf06f2c568605bd6a90c9cf2b425cd51512e7
Like we did for other links in /diff and /histories, there are some
links that we'd better display as OOUI buttons. Also, use the Html
class' specific method to show errorboxes.
Bug: T132284
Change-Id: If67035991a0835ec3edc13be4543e6b40c76c3ea
I'd like to have this reviewed by more than one user before merging, to avoid regressions of annoying typos.
Change-Id: I91a9c5cca55e540a6c95b750579c1c369a760b15
I found these vulnerabilities while trying to setup seccheck. Although
I'm not sure whether seccheck recognised them, I'm sure that they exist
since I did manual tests, and it's possible to inject custom scripts
with these.
Change-Id: I97804be8352a1b784d483195edb29e363a0c616e
The variable was declared in the "if" branch but also used in the "else"
one. This caused the rules textarea to not have the readonly attribute
if the user wasn't allowed and CodeEditor wasn't installed.
Change-Id: I2bf69dc0f2d24efac41d1ac6100ed7e286e3afa4
This is taken from I6a57a28f22600aafb2e529587ecce6083e9f7da4 and makes
all the needed changes to make phan pass. Seccheck will instead fail,
but since it's not clear how to fix it (and it is non-voting), for the
moment we may merge this and enable phan on IC.
Bug: T192325
Change-Id: I77648b6f8e146114fd43bb0f4dfccdb36b7ac1ac
