On second thought, no need to keep the migration script now, since it's
unusable anyway.
Also remove an usage in SpecialAbuseLog, likely a rebase artefact.
Change-Id: I938924b3617ef30046d8317e68a101ed2c1883d3
This replaces the previous pattern of callers having to use
RevisionLookup if the result was 'implicit'. Also, in some cases where
we were just hiding things if the visibility was !== true, properly
handle the implicit case by using the new method. Make the new method
return string constants rather than bool|string.
The new method also fixes some potential info leaks which happened when
the row was hidden, the user could view suppressed AbuseLog entries, but
the associated revision was also deleted and the user couldn't see it
(this shouldn't be relevant for WMF wikis since AF deletion is
oversight-level).
Also add a bunch of tests for the various cases to ensure we don't
regress again.
Bug: T261532
Change-Id: I929f865acf5d207b739cb3af043f70cb59243ee0
ParserStatus is now more lightweight, and doesn't know about "result"
and "from cache". Instead, it has an isValid() method which is merely a
shorthand for checking whether getException() is null.
Introduce a child class, RuleCheckerStatus, which knows about result and
cache and can be (un)serialized.
This removes the ambiguity of the $result field, and helps the
transition to a new RuleChecker class.
Change-Id: I0dac7ab4febbfdabe72596631db630411d967ab5
Something somewhere is leaving error_reporting in a dirty state
causing AbuseFilter's ConsequencesExecutorTest case to fail for
the core change Ic9fee6cdd88001025.
Per T253461, we're meant to eventually remove this anyway, so might
as well remove it in areas that are known to get it wrong somehow.
Change-Id: I2a665f09a357f2f2cc258d8c4011d49a7ab9c13b
The old parser now has the correct name "Evaluator", so the
ParserFactory name was outdated. Additionally, the plan is to create a
new RuleChecker class, acting as a facade for the different
parsing-related stages (lexer, parser, evaluator, etc.), which is what
most if not all callers should use. The RuleCheckerFactory still returns
a FilterEvaluator for now.
Also, "Parser" is a specific term defining *how* things happen
internally, whereas "RuleChecker" describes *what* callers should expect
from the new class.
Change-Id: I25b47a162d933c1e385175aae715ca38872b1442
Remove unnecessary setters, injecting everything in the constructor.
These were leftovers from before the introduction of ParserFactory.
Remove public access to the conds used, include the information inside
the returned ParserStatus instead, and consequently simplify callers.
Change-Id: I0a30e044877c6c858af3ff73f819d5ec7c4cc769
So that the method can be typehinted in core.
Also add phan-var to fix broken master build due to typehint additions
in core.
Change-Id: I4a072e00ffeeb437753fc3d3c1f15de9929df510
This commit adds a class AFPSyntaxChecker which can statically analyze
a filter code to detect the following errors:
- unbound variables (which comes in two modes: conservative and liberal,
default to conservative)
- unused variables (disabled by default for compatibilty)
- assignment on built-in identifiers
- function application's arity mismatch
- function application's invalid function name
- non-string literal in the first argument of set / set_var
The existing parser and evaluator are modified as follows:
- The new (caching) evaluator no longer needs to perform variable
hoisting at runtime.
- Note that for array assignment, this changes the semantics.
- The new parser is more lenient, reducing parsing errors.
The static analyzer will catch these errors instead, allowing us
to give a much better error message and reduces the complexity of
the parser.
* The parser now allows function name to be any identifier.
* The parser now allows arity mismatch to occur.
* The parser now allows the first argument of set to be any expression.
Concretely, obvious changes that users will see are:
1. a := [1]; false & (a[] := 2); a[0] === 1
would evaluate to true, while it used to evaluate to the undefined value
due to hoisting
2. f(1)
will now error with 'f is not a valid function' as opposed to
'Unexpected "T_BRACE"'
3. length
will now error with 'Illegal use of built-in identifier "length"'
as opposed to 'Expected a ('
Appendix: conservative and liberal mode
The conservative mode is completely compatible with the current evaluator.
That is,
false & (a := 1); a
will not deem `a` as unbound, though this is actually undesirable because
`a` would then be bound to the troublesome undefined value.
The liberal mode rejects the above pattern by deeming `a` as unbound.
However, it also rejects
true & (a := 1); a
even though (a := 1) is always executed. Since there are several filters
in Wikimedia projects that rely on this behavior, we default the mode
to conservative for now.
Note that even the liberal mode doesn't really respect lexical scope
appeared in some other programming languages (see also T234690).
For instance:
(if true then (a := 1) else (a := 2) end); a
would be accepted by the liberal checker, even though under lexical scope,
`a` would be unbound. However, it is unlikely that lexical scope
will be suitable for the filter language, as most filters in
Wikimedia projects that have user-defined variable do violate lexical scope.
Bug: T260903
Bug: T238709
Bug: T237610
Bug: T234690
Bug: T231536
Change-Id: Ic6d030503e554933f8d220c6f87b680505918ae2
