Adding `margin-top` property only with sibling selector for now
until cache is cleared.
Also removing already inherited from
`.mw-body-content` properties `position`,
`font-size` and `line-height` of same value.
Bug: T248761
Change-Id: I1ea5e08927a96ac69c1b65f248ae0420968b4d00
The new template 'index.mustache' drops the Navigation
template partial (component) - instead embedding it in
the master template given its lack of usability.
Note to reviewer: Please ensure index.mustache and
legacy.mustache are identical.
Change-Id: I580fe55ca6aeb35dae8afee41e87172a5a729c7b
It is not the most useful of components and adds an additional layer
of complexity similar to multiple inheritance chains that we find in
Object oriented programming.
I suggest we use index.mustache going forward for laying out the different
components and use components/template partials for reusable components.
Change-Id: I6fd5fe1c3d3826d737ccd8ed5a38890305664876
This commit is singularly focused on adding a link to the sidebar for
Vector, logged-in users. It does the bare minimum to fulfill the
requirements of T243281.
Additionally, it will help to answer the question "Do we need to use
abstractions (other than maybe different templates) to separate Legacy
Vector from Vector" by intentionally leaving out any abstractions in
order to make it easier to compare with a follow-up patch
(Ib2ef15180df73360cc1de25b893e49d415d23e1a) which does use abstractions.
It is a good thing to question whether or not we need addtional
abstractions in VectorTemplate and if they will help us as unnecessary
abstractions can have the opposite effect and just lead to further
frustrations down the road.
Therefore, I urge you, the reviewer, to let me know your thoughts! If
abstractions are viewed as not making our lives any easier, the
follow-up patches may be completely discarded and that's totally okay
with me. :) I think it's a good think to talk about now though.
Important changes:
* The VectorTemplate constructor was changed to allow injecting the
config, templateParser, and isLegacy boolean (only the config was
allowed before this commit). According to MediaWiki's Stable Interface
Policy, "Constructor signatures are generally considered unstable unless
explicitly declared stable for calling" [3]. Given that VecorTemplate's
constructor is not marked as stable, it is justified to do this without
warning according to the policy.
* Due to the above, the 'setTemplate' method is no longer needed and was
marked as deprecated.
* VectorTemplateTest was made to adapt to the new VectorTemplate
constructor. Additionally, it now extends from
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase which my intelliphense server can pick up.
I *think* MediaWikiTestCase is just an alias to
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase [1] and MediaWikiTestCase file was renamed
to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase in [2], but I'm willing to change it
back if there is pushback to this.
Open questions:
* What are VectorTemplate's responsibilities? To me, it acts right now
as a controller (because it echos the full HTML string from the
template), a model (because SkinTemplate::prepareQuickTemplate sets data
on it which it later retrieves through `$this->get()`), a presenter
(because it adds data tailored for a web-centric view), and a view
(because it renders HTML strings instead of letting the view/template be
solely responsible for that). Arguably, some business logic might be
mixed in there as well (because it checks to see if a User is logged
in/has necessary permissions to show x which my changes here add to).
This might not be a problem if we keep VectorTemplate relatively small,
but will it remain this way as we progress further in Desktop
Improvements?
* How do we write tests for VectorTemplate without exposing unnecessary
public methods? For example, if I want to test the `getSkinData()`
method to see what state will be sent to the template, how should I do
this? One option might be to use `TestingAccessWrapper` to expose these
private methods which is what
`VectorTemplateTest::testbuildViewsProps()` does. Another option is to
accept this method as public. Is there a better way? Keep in mind that
even with access to this method, there might be many things to mock.
[1] 0030cb525b/tests/common/TestsAutoLoader.php (L64)
[2] Ie717b0ecf4fcfd089d46248f14853c80b7ef4a76
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Stable_interface_policy
Bug: T243281
Change-Id: I0571b041bcd7f19bec9f103fa7bccdd093f6394d
This allows us to insert HTML underneath the first portal or wrap
the portal in a containing element in future if we want to target
additional CSS to it
Change-Id: Ied28d95407b8d59fc819bb07a2cce3242bd93088
Separate value type from value groups, to clarify that e.g.
something coming from a hook does not mean it should not have "html-".
Change-Id: I52fdd6995241e1d64f23fd8154997de813f674f4
CHANGES to index.mustache:
Changes can be understood by looking at the diff of
the file stories/skin.stories.js
The additional changes in stories folder export the data passed to
those templates. A new file is used as exporting any variable in a
file suffixed stories.js will be assumed to be a story entry.
The changes to index.mustache are as follows:
* html-footer is replaced with data-footer and Footer
component is rendered via template partial
* html-navigation is replaced with data-navigation and
Navigation component is rendered via template partial
CHANGES to Navigation.mustache:
Changes are best explained by looking at the diff to
stories/navigation.stories.js
and navigation.stories.data.js
* html-personal-menu is replaced with data-personal-menu
Bug: T245456
Change-Id: Ie96e92447a932b8a7f3844df277a1d31a2af423c
For better encapsulation and future possibility to create Skin API
we have to stop accesing properties and start using getters/setters
instead. Once we start doing that we should be able to provide a
clear interface for our templating system.
Bug: T246161
Change-Id: Ib3539b1e3bc12341c79913af3c95acad8619cff4
Moving all the templateParser calls to one function
so its easier to see how the template is composed.
The diff of changes to the stories folder highlight
the internal changes which are:
* html-portals replaced with html-sidebar in main template
* new Sidebar template added which outputs to html-sidebar
* Mention of "MainMenu" replaced with better understood "Sidebar"
This is precursory work to adopt templatePartials
Change-Id: I6b2196e39087f818e774d04b2d1b9ab8cb8816a1
The renderNavigation function provides an unnecessary level of
abstraction which I'd argue hurts readability of these functions.
Let's remove it.
Change-Id: Iad1c4db606404fecf4d5ae98981df9f05d3f661e
Use a template variable only for html attributes of the logo
Move static HTML into Navigation.mustache
Change-Id: If37015b9ce4f37e264b6f25956e4d0ca35e8cdff
Vector provides two vector specific hooks:
- VectorAfterToolbox
- VectorBeforeToolbox
Instead of supporting Vector specific stuff we should aim
for a nice global skin api and allow other 3rd party to
extend MediaWiki functionality no matter which skin is currently
on.
Bug: T240062
Change-Id: I245f1316e79f814ba04f4e0a0223d4f0596cf39e
This will allow us to render in Storybook without having issues
with unclosed tags. it also mirrors how html-headelement works
(obscuring the opening of the body and html tags)
Bug: T240062
Bug: T242674
Change-Id: I216a920c68bf3da9de55a75fc53451c68c9cc753
A Portal (or portlet) in the Vector context is a section of the
sidebar menu (e.g. Tools, Languges etc.).
The hook that places content between the portals (or portlets?)
such as `SkinTemplateToolboxEnd` and `otherlanguages` has been
enclosed inside of an output buffer so that any content it
produces can be passed to a template.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I882db161e5462cf88aa48c9cfd91448eb97a4a77
Extracts a new VectorMenu mustache component from VectorTemplate.
VectorMenu is the "more" menu that appears at small widths instead of the
Read/Edit/View History menu near the top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I41b1ec949d81303abddadb981741445572c939e3
PersonalMenu is the login/logout notifications etc. menu at the very
top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: Iae224cbd838e44669a9f27e6dd303c6c3b402d41
For consistency with VectorTabs, rename SearchComponent to only imply
component. At least two word names seems like a good target (instead of
just "Search") for grepability and standard component style conventions.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I1e4f7270ba29c2f35f08e92f8a28cd8a2ec8fe87
The tab attributes were mistakenly being echoed instead of passed by
value. E.g., http://localhost:8181/wiki/A?uselang=he.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: Ia0af96df717948743a2d66f8432b47e6f8a9c8f1
Creates a new VectorTabs.mustache component and uses it to render
the namespace & view tabs.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I859e4e95a2a12470f66564db547679c9f0a16727
Extract SearchComponent.mustache from VectorTemplate. The "search"
message is now escaped by the template parser. As is, htmlspecialchars()
for "wgScript".
A later patch will change each component renderer function as well as
renderNavigation() to return a string.
Change-Id: I3084b7e0ef73d320c85ee780c9eff13ecea92906
Move template logic outside of the template and into variables. This
will allow a future refactor to move the template to a separate
template-only file.
Change-Id: I91c2df11106cf09428a890a2d96ecbddb18ef0fe
Cut up renderNavigation() into several discrete methods. Smaller methods
are easier to read and reason about.
Change-Id: I4e55d858ab1745fb2baddef02f7046ec842eb149
Regression from 74b9803d9a, caused by a bug in LightNCandy which
caused {{foo}} to render "0", and {{#foo}} to pass as true with "0", but then
in {{#foo}}<b>{{foo}}</b>{{/foo} render as empty string producing "<b></b>".
In other words, the conditional is passing and the inner block is executed,
but the placeholder is mistakenly converting "0" => null => "" (empty string),
causing the <h1> to render but without any text in it.
Work around this bug by simply removing the conditional. Several other skins
already don't have this conditional and it's unclear why or in what
situation MediaWiki would send OutputPage to SkinTemplate without a title.
I think it would make sense in such rare case to still have a consistent
layout for extensions and gadgets to interact with and not omit the H1
element, but render it with the value that OutputPage gave it, even if it
is the empty string.
Bug: T219864
Change-Id: I6e04b512d2fe2e949ff5385cb38ceebe392fb255
This reverts commit a3ca2c3e16.
Reason for revert: This requires wider discussion before moving
forward, and a more complete implementation even once we do have
consensus.
No associated task exists on which to view or continue this
discussion: linked task briefly mentions Mustache in general as an
option as part of a much wider topic, but doesn't concern this
specifically.
Issues that should be discussed include:
* What the intent even is here: is this for one skin only? Is this
the intended path forward for all of them? Depending on which, we
have other issues: for the former case, that it is quite
unhelpful in terms of maintenance and further development having
more random code diversity out there, especially in this
half-completed state; or if it is indeed intended for all of them,
that an RfC is needed before anything is merged, as that is a very
significant change.
* That using Mustache in MediaWiki does add (usually minor)
performance overhead; we need to clearly establish in the task that
this is indeed worth it here.
Change-Id: I0bafa55b554aa8a38553e20c75859ec5eec2c062
The VectorTemplate class extends BaseTemplate, which has defined
this method since MW 1.25. The Vector skin master branch supports
MW 1.29+ only.
Change-Id: I83c6add9e8c02df028ca5905934e7d367dbe2209
Xml::expandAttributes() outputs a space at the beginning before it
outputs the attributs.
This change avoids a double space between the attributes.
Before this change the HTML contains:
<a class="mw-wiki-logo" href="..." title="...">
After this change the HTML contains:
<a class="mw-wiki-logo" href="..." title="...">
Change-Id: I486d26bd56a4410766f40b78466c2f3559f3a1ff
Before this change the HTML contains:
<div id="p-personal" role="navigation" class="" ...>
or
<div id="p-personal" role="navigation" class=" emptyPortlet" ...>
After this change the HTML contains:
<div id="p-personal" role="navigation" ...>
or
<div id="p-personal" role="navigation" class="emptyPortlet" ...>
Change-Id: Ic686b958940afc958693d0031ac31e5f783960a9
Unordered lists can be absolute positioned down to IE 7.
Outdated selector `.vectorMenu ul` remains for a release cycle
until HTML cache is renewed.
Bug: T209558
Change-Id: Id18ca9a8d705572b1f7e17920ef52b80e9aec373
* Improve their accessibility by giving both links
a full label "Jump to x" and "Jump to y" instead
of "Jump to: ", "x", "y".
This also makes things much better for localisation, for which
we generally discourage use of concatenation.
* Use pure CSS for the toggling of the visibility on focus,
instead of relying on JavaScript. Especially given the
JS comes form core's 'jquery.mw-jump' module, which is
considered technical debt per T195256. Alternatively,
that could be copied to vector.js, but pure CSS
is possible, so why not.
* Use plain <a> links in the HTML instead of wrapped in a <div>.
This solves the long-standing problem whereby the margin
between #contentSub and #mw-content-text had to be awkwardly
negated and overridden in core and on various to make sure that
the wrapper itself would become visible as needed, in a way that
has margin around this. This whole problem doesn't apply when
simply using inline links that aren't part of the regular flow
with .mixin-screen-reader-text. On focus, the individually
focussed link appears in regular flow, without the need for
any custom styles.
* This uses :not(:focus) to naturally make it render in the default
way on focus, and visibibly hidden/clipped otherwise.
This is supported in IE9+ and Android 2+.
There is a way to make it work with CSS2 for IE7-8, by applying
the mixin to '.mw-jump-link' only and then undoing all of
'position', 'width', 'height', 'clip', and 'margin' on :focus.
But I'm not sure that's worth it here. The fallback in IE7-8
for not supporting ":not(:focus)" is that the accessibility
link is simply visible always, which seems like a good fallback
for accessibility, and doesn't hurt anything.
Bug: T195256
Change-Id: Icaadb290f692b3617688d32cbb66dfb007f1c82c
