Goal: Make skins.minerva.editor not rely on Minerva-specific markup.
SkinMinerva.php:
* Add `class="mw-editsection"` to section edit links in SkinMinerva.
This is the default behavior in SkinTemplate.
* Tweak the page "Edit" link generated in PHP to be the same as the
link we were generating in JS: add class="edit-page" and change the
message for the text.
* (Fix an unrelated code comment that was incorrect.)
skins.minerva.content.styles/hacks.less:
* Remove a hack that was hiding .mw-editsection, since we now use it.
skins.minerva.editor/init.js:
* Stop using the `data-section` attribute on links to decide which
page section to open in the editor. Instead, use the `href`
attribute and extract the `section` URL parameter from it.
* Stop using the `edit-page` class to find section edit links.
Instead, use the `mw-editsection` class.
* Remove super weird code that removed the original "Edit" link from
the page and generated an identical one to replace it, instead of
just adding event handlers to the existing one.
* Centralize event handling for all types of edit links.
Bug: T198765
Change-Id: I79639c738ff1c3ec4b48ee2e462d23060151a21b
These CSS classes are specific to the Minerva skin and we want to move
this file to MobileFrontend.
Now that this code is all in one place, I noticed that it seems to not
do much at all… Everything in this function looks like it could just
be done in the PHP code. If PHP does it all, then we could remove all
of it for a free performance improvement.
Bug: T198765
Change-Id: I6487c2fc520e14e0856b2e9a6f9dfa5066205817
The fancy mobile editor doesn't support undo, but we can just use the
fallback (no-JS) editor. The experience is not very friendly (e.g. due
to two-column diff), but it works.
Previously we showed an old-school alert() message and then loaded the
fancy editor as if it was a normal edit, ignoring the undo parameters.
The whole thing is rather hypothetical, since there are no links to undo
in the mobile interface. See T191706.
Bug: T191706
Change-Id: I5147ada9e85d9188f19ae898fdd411985d19182f
* Page edit action (#ca-edit)
I guess it became always visible when no-JS editing was implemented?
* User page creation CTA (.edit-link)
I'm making it always visible in Ie2fc6d43ebc03626517eec21bf4738dca05152d0
(which also makes it available for no-JS editing).
* Section edit links for nested sub-sections (.in-block > .edit-page)
No idea about these, but they are clearly always shown (even in
non-article namespaces).
Depends-On: Ie2fc6d43ebc03626517eec21bf4738dca05152d0
Change-Id: I226cb1fd1e716078a4a34ed8349d5304428964cf
It was limited to the main namespace since its introduction in
Ieabe8f7071696cde6afbdc6df853aacdb741a4a3. Unfortunately that
commit does not explain the reason.
It should be shown e.g. on user pages (so that sandbox pages
look like the real article) or on project pages (many policy
or help pages on Wikipedia are long and would benefit from it).
It looks like some of the CSS code already assumed that the
TOC would be shown in all namespaces (space for it was reserved
using a 'visibility: hidden;' element on all pages).
Bug: T205312
Change-Id: Id6935f5a7a3701c1c7a38fb37b48b6a3bbc80393
This code could never be used under normal circumstances since
a crucial bit of it was removed from MobileFrontend in 2015:
(I65e943b6dad8bfea994020f9f555bd095da1a171)
// Allow us to distinguish sign ups from the left nav to logins.
// This allows us to show them an edit tutorial when they return to the page.
if ( $query['returntoquery'] === 'welcome=yes' ) {
$query['returntoquery'] = 'campaign=leftNavSignup';
}
…and honestly, that's for good, because it fails horribly
when triggered by adding &campaign=leftNavSignup to the URL
manually: clicking "Start editing" in the callout navigates
you to an article called "Undefined/leftNavSignup".
Bug: T205325
Change-Id: I0e385488be5b2eaa7d489029b91e18b336c0d133
Unlike other skins, Minerva wants to be in charge of when WikimediaEvents
is loaded, so that it can guarantee load order happens at a time that
suits it.
WikimediaEvents will be loaded after initialisation of the interface.
This allows Minerva to enable schemas such as ReadingDepth conditionally.
Upon merging this patch, Ibb45f40ea301727c0c6480043760bd9426106845 can
be merged which will revoke WikimediaEvent's ownership.
Merging in this order will ensure that ReadingDepth is never
removed from production.
Bug: T204144
Change-Id: If8395033f31485aca0ca3b38fda1be985369b481
In I1a471f81cc9390fc9e8665a7a336cf2dd7a063ab we excluded
edit events that led to the creation of a new page.
This restores them by providing a dedicated home for this data
in the schema.
Additional changes:
* Address some line length warnings
Bug: T204073
Change-Id: Ie7eb95f15737e94b7926d38ed6411bc0e5df2404
This event is meant to track attempts to edit the page we are on,
but also happened to catch clicks on "see talk page" links, in
case that talk page doesn't exist yet.
Bug: T204073
Change-Id: I1a471f81cc9390fc9e8665a7a336cf2dd7a063ab
We need to load these only when VisualEditor is loaded. This is
the best way to ensure that. They have been haphazardly placed
in different files.
The goal of this change is to move content styling for Minerva out of
mobile.editor.ve/minerva.less, and thus to be able to move this file
to mediawiki/extensions/MobileFrontend (T202978). But I spotted the
other places while working on that.
Moved as-is:
* skins.minerva.content.styles/links.less
* mobile.editor.ve/minerva.less
No longer needed:
* skins.minerva.content.styles/text.less
Parsoid now uses <sup> tags for references rather than <span>,
so the existing rules for <sup> tags are enough. See T45094,
<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Specs/HTML/1.6.0/Extensions/Cite>.
Was never needed:
* skins.minerva.content.styles/thumbnails.less
The styles from the core module 'mediawiki.skinning.content.parsoid'
are never loaded, so we don't need to override them.
Bug: T202978
Change-Id: I45e1cb89b65a41a29d2b1a361a79199745ccec14
This exposes two broken tests:
* #setCount (Eastern Arabic numerals)
* clicking on the product of createBanner() should trigger a custom event
that were previously passing due to buggy assertions.
Change-Id: If18ad1ff9363fff65d3e347c01ce4bc0669b2a0e
The page-issues reducer function that retrieves the severityLevels
for issues was incorrectly comparing two values in the multiple-issues
scenario.
Instead of comparing the severity of the current issue with the previous
value in the accumulator, it was comparing the current issue with the
previous issue in the original array, thus ignoring the
previous `maxSeverity` value in the accumulator.
Tests added and function refactored with more explicit variable names.
Bug: T203725
Change-Id: Ia4c15cbf0c2457d68a7381e8ed04c1a6b3ae65d1
Erroneously in I6fd55c35b9e2ce35894259f36d1a50fb5dca5e43 for the old treatment
we sent sectionNumbers for all issues in the page.
This is inconsistent with the issuesSeverity field above it
Add a clarifying inline comment.
Bug: T203050
Change-Id: Ib1fcda0c49a162cd7aca8ee8b3221236f724e1d7
Rather than using err and error as variable, use error for consistency
Follow up to I07f01b4c025b2e5e4cbf88ec05e7c536442c62cc
Bug: T202026
Change-Id: I54165ff1f1b17284d8232c491244e1a98950d5e2
createBanner was incorrectly always assigning the 'all' keyword
to the old page issues banner. Instead it should use the section
number in the function signature - as this decision of which issues
to show is made inside initPageIssues
For the old treatment, in the main namespace, we only show issues
in the lead section. When we use the 'all' keyword the visual is
the same, but it breaks the instrumentation requirement that
sectionNumbers and issuesSeverity should be the correct length
Note, for the talk and category pages treatment, we do not
log any events so the instrumentation doesn't matter here
and the 'all' keyword correctly targets all issues in the page
as before.
Bug: T203050
Change-Id: I63e45da05ca033fe282633f7fd59038a8e5d8c8d
For the page-issues modalClose event, the number of values for `sectionNumbers`
and `issuesSeverity` should be the same, since `sectionNumbers` should describe
the the section of each visible issue in the modal, not the section of the
modal itself.
Bug: T203050
Change-Id: Ic58c5940a6059e71aa3aeed26232afbe8faf1618
Extensions may be using these tags and not want
these styles (especially the border).
Bug: T203474
Change-Id: I03a22cf6377002f968cabdcce9354e73354fb6b8
When handling special cases that are logically distinct from
the function's main branch, it improves code quality (through
readability and maintainability) to place those first and with
an early return.
The has the benefit of the main return statement being easy to
find at the end of the function. (Not early and/or in a block).
It also means when working on the code, there is generally a
less complexity and fewer nesting levels, given that most code
is in the main branch. This makes is easier and quicker to verify
that code does what it should, as well as making it easy to
extend in the future. When considering to add code to end of a
function's main scope, it should relate to the function's main
branch by default, not a special case. For example, a getName()
method should not end with a top-level statement 'return false'
(unless it is a stub). Rather, one would expect it to end with
`return name`.
Change-Id: I1f3088f2409c82dd3bf757fc8fa27dc97ae2767b
This adds a client side error logger that will store errors
in EventLogging. We will use it to get a sense of the number
of errors inside mobile.
To enable make use of the new configuration variable
wgMinervaErrorLogSamplingRate = 1
Notes:
* the optional `meta` field will not be utilised by the generic
error handler.
* URI length is not trimmed for title. We will consider whether we need
to make any adjustments to the schema values during roll out.
** For stack trace, we limit the length by removing errorUrl (which is logged
separately)
Testing:
Add throw new Error('asasasa'); anywhere in your code and make
sure the code executes. It should trigger an Error event provided
that configuration has been updated.
Bug: T202026
Change-Id: I07f01b4c025b2e5e4cbf88ec05e7c536442c62cc
"multiple issues" templates as one issue.
When logging the `issuesSeverity` and `sectionNumbers` field,
any issues that are part of a "multiple issues" template only send
one value.
Adds an `isMultiple` property to IssueSummary to determine which
issues are part of a multiple-issues template.
Bug: T203050
Change-Id: I7d55dfead72439df4accadcdc8623a080e1321c2
The value of `sectionNumbers` should be the section number of each issue
Not the number of the sections that have issues.
Bug: T203050
Change-Id: I6fd55c35b9e2ce35894259f36d1a50fb5dca5e43
