These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
Ib957eac2d checked to see if actionTools.notices existed before
destroying it, but assumed it always existed if editNotices was
set. This patch adds a check before attempting to show editNotices.
The error occurs because Ibc7fa48df unregisters the 'notices' tool
(along with many others) for AddLinkArticleTarget.js in
GrowthExperiments. I92a3162ef in GrowthExperiments will empty out
any notices to work around this problem.
Bug: T281960
Change-Id: Idacd365efa82ecd5c0074ead035eda0cb9444b1f
Switching from visual editor to old wikitext editor results in a
page reload and loss of the mw.libs.ve.disableWelcomeDialog()
flag. Use an URL parameter to preserve the flag.
Bug: T235812
Change-Id: I3968e5b7ae536d45fd764a8b7c3ea1f6d616033f
If a teardown has started, there should be a teardownPromise,
otherwise return a rejected promise.
Bug: T268358
Change-Id: Ia5cbd6b409a38f97243234ea7c87d24f71bdf3d6
MediaWiki doesn't have such a limitation. This might have been copied
from the edit summary code, which used to be limited to 255 bytes.
Change-Id: I4afe9b1cde0663c47c0c2502b6e32116b912208b
This patch starts using watchlist related values from ApiEditPage
results instead of updating the "watch link" based on whether the
checkbox was selected or not at the time of saving the article.
This change does not depend on T261030 and can be merged without it
but T261030 needs to be fixed or temporarily watched items will not
display the right tooltip when hovering the "watch link" or star icon.
Bug: T260434
Change-Id: I2c844223620d7d28f36a0cd8ae3dee4b0c8ae5bf
Rebuild the category list from the data we got from the API. This makes
it work regardless of whether we came here from activating on an
existing page, switching from source mode, or loading via an edit URL.
Because Parsoid doesn't include redlink status on the <link>s it
represents the categories as, we do have to manually update those
styles.
Bug: T251398
Change-Id: Iaaef3223816269bba1371fbb07956119a120c1ca
Change $originalContent to $editableContent, as counter-intuitively
the editing surface is attached inside $originalContent, while
$editableContent contains only the hidden existing page content.
It was not a problem previously because of the order.
Bug: T254518
Change-Id: I68f7ddb45f09dff475b183ccfeaf98e67b83066e
Translate itself will show an warning dialog when user tries to edit
a translatable page in visual mode. Editing in the source mode is
allowed.
Bug: T192052
Depends-On: I03ea64353b2d5b28d684f90936cab75ea4fd40d2
Change-Id: Ie4f3a6003c27773c6d0c5086c876fe424befe25a
This handles the minor edit and watch checkboxes, as well as any added
by extensions (e.g. FlaggedRevs).
Switching in the other direction already works fine, that is
implemented in ArticleTarget#getSaveFields.
It doesn't seem ideal to put this code into the constructor of
ve.init.mw.DesktopArticleTarget, but that's where we already have
similar logic for the edit summary. I filed T253696 about this.
Bug: T250388
Change-Id: Ia6a9c0465ed215e8f74b9fff4590593383e9a1e6
Move shouldShowWelcomeDialog() and stopShowingWelcomeDialog() from
DesktopArticleTarget to DesktopArticleTarget.init, and use them to
deduplicate code in init that manages the wikitext welcome dialog.
Look for both the vehidebetadialog and hidewelcomedialog URL params.
The code in DesktopArticleTarget used vehidebetadialog, but the code in
init for the wikitext welcome dialog used hidewelcomedialog.
Bug: T249954
Change-Id: I19f1a2da36bc65addb52811c3d3c73c1259bc8f5
The base class doesn't use it, it only defines it, and
DesktopArticleTarget is the only subclass that uses it.
MobileArticleTarget calls it, but also overrides it to be a no-op.
Change-Id: Ib3feea94844f4e1ed71dccece7657450516cac89
Factor out the logic for whether the WelcomeDialog should be shown into
its own method, and write it in a less confusing way. Do the same thing
with the logic for setting the preference/storage/cookie for hiding the
WelcomeDialog.
This makes maybeShowWelcomeDialog() much simpler, and removes duplicated
code in DesktopArticleTarget.
There is one minor change in behavior: if the WelcomeDialog is
suppressed using the URL parameter, that no longer causes the preference
to be updated as if the dialog had been shown.
Change-Id: I1d4f912c5f6bd7a2bbad2b209b97c3ec1f250a07
The .statusText and .status properties belong to the XMLHttpRequest
object, and are not present on the API response data object. I think
these checks were left over "just in case" when this code was ported
to use mw.Api instead of XMLHttpRequest directly.
MediaWiki API should never return just 'error' as the error code.
Change-Id: Iac6f721881b9405919d3397df6606e54f182bc59
loadFail can result in a retry, in which case it isn't
approraite to reject this promise. Also many of the code
paths call 'tryTeardown' which itself will reject the promise.
Bug: T238332
Change-Id: I366662847304d8ecf79d5899b2804dded67ee999
* Add a postWikitext method and split out postContent
from postHtml
* Move saveSuccess handling into postContent promise
* Connect promise directly to saveComplete instead
* Pass whole response.visualeditoredit object, instead
of splitting into variadic arguments for saveComplete.
* [DEPRECATION] Make serialize return the postHtml promise
and deprecate passing a callback.
Change-Id: I905737515578000b2b87214c92e8b9fe9e82f6b7
A @method annotation is only necessary when the docblock is not
directly followed by a function declaration (in which case JSDuck
assumes it documents a property), e.g. when defining an abstract
function or referencing a function from another library.
I verified that JSDuck generates exactly the same output before and
after this change (docs/data-<hash>.js files are identical).
Change-Id: I7edf51a8560ab9978b42800ab1026f0b5555c3bf
We were incorrectly always adding action=edit to the URL in that case.
The condition was always passing because `this.section` is `null` when
unset, but `this.currentUri.query.section` is `undefined` when unset.
This is a similar fix/bug to a68cc38b22.
Bug: T209163
Change-Id: Ic80ac377b763aea53678c4209ba6b3a6ba2996c9
Since we're inside the Target instance, `ve.init.target` refers to
this object. Some of the code I'm changing even uses `this` instead
of `ve.init.target` on the next or previous line.
Most of the mistakes are a result of mass search-and-replace changes
(478b0bcb, e1a887cc), or moving the code from other classes (d294006d).
But I can't explain the "ve.init.target.getSurface().getDom()" line,
it would be good to figure out why it was this way before we change it.
Change-Id: I0d7c6a48369242d4c99620fcd775ab537420d84a
Depends lightly on a patch to WikiEditor, which will hook up the logging there
for the case where the switch is happening from WikiEditor to VisualEditor on
the same pageload.
Bug: T221191
Change-Id: Ibafec77b2eabd3b3b3767472b7b5a40e3312bf18
mw.Uri requires undefined rather than null to unset a parameter;
null instead generates a parameter with no value (and no equals sign).
Our own code in ve.init.mw.DesktopArticleTarget.init.js parseSection()
can't parse that and causes an exception.
Change-Id: I783ea6b91c115b79bbd9deac6669bea0661139af
This message was upstreamed to core and later renamed.
Use the upstreamed dialog itself when switching sections.
Bug: T222525
Change-Id: Ibd2d75ec503e92b5ddec2105f762b0c9f0dc96fb
* Remove 'discardChanges' from switchToWikitext. This was
intended to discard changes even when the document was
modified, but it is no longer used as we always keep
changes if we can.
* Remove 'leaveVE' param, it was only used once and has
been replaced with a direct call to switchToFallbackWikitextEditor.
* Don't reset 'section' if there are no changes.
Bug: T221981
Change-Id: Ia39345da44d203ba67ae331917c8d5ece7d42ef7
