I'm pretty sure this extra call is just pointless. This "choose"
event is triggered every time a new parameter is added to the list of
parameters. But there is another code path that is triggered in the
exact same situations: the onReplacePart event handler.
As far as I remember this "choose" handler was added very early when
the other events haven't been implemented yet.
This should be fairly easy to test. The only situation where this
could make a difference is:
1. When you have a template with 3 parameters and you add a 4th
parameter.
2. When you edit an existing multi-part transclusion that contains a
lot of parameters, but the parameters are initially hidden. The
widgets are only created when you click "show all" or start
searching.
Change-Id: I59e3873a4fe6fa5a01d681fce89fbe00756ae815
This was missing when you:
* Insert a new template and select a template with a lot of
parameters.
* Same when you edit an existing multi-part template and add a new
part (Ctrl+D) with many parameters.
Bug: T315292
Change-Id: Icd281c21a1b40d8e29343fa4975e27e8d927cd15
Note this implementation introduces some technical debt: It adds a
little bit of knowledge about what "part widgets" and the toolbar are
to the parameter SelectWidget. I think this is acceptable.
A "cleaner" implementation is probably so complicated that we don't
want it in the code, for such a minor benefit. However, alternative
patches are very much welcome.
Bug: T313703
Change-Id: I957698d58a7622cbe54bcc2ba454388ba9f09537
Generally the default button margin on the parts is 24px. The only
exception are the placeholder and wikitext when they are the last
parts in the outline.
Bug: T312644
Change-Id: Ie513bf1c022b2696cc92aacbbca59ddf6e55043e
In Iebfe2e2 we already tweaked this by 1px. Turns out this was not
enough in all relevant situations. I still get random scroll events
just because I move the mouse around. Setting: Firefox, 120% zoom,
multi-part transclusion.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: I475c1ef029e9721cc663881e40547730389cd26d
* Rename method because it turns out it is not only about the sticky
header, but also relevant when there is no header.
* Move some code to more appropriate places.
* Use 0 as documented in OOUI, not null.
* Set the padding back to 0 when the sticky header is not visible.
As of now this is an unreachable state because the filters never go
away after they have been made visible. Still this code was always
written with this possibility in mind to make it future-proof.
* Performance optimization for the boolean "show filters?" check.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: Iaba08ccd8bf00360fd26f9268d5be43df4f4fbd8
This is a partial revert of Ide45141. Now the scrolling always
happens (again), but properly considers the presence of the sticky
header. It was also not correctly initialized on construction time.
This is a candidate for a backport. The patch is intentionally as
small as possible because of this. Code cleanup will be done in a
later patch.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: I06425b42566bfb2087846636055ee75e98a05029
The message was also shown when a documented template appears as
part of a multi-part transclusion but with zero parameters being
used. You see the filters in this case and can click "show all".
The message is just wrong in this situation.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: I8d26ceec483e05fd1f69013e506fa1eb4e4c29ed
Currently the sticky size is exactly 114px. With 115px you also can
see an auto scroll effect on multi part transclusions when you hit
that 1px sweat spot at the top of the list.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: Iebfe2e2c6360c650755cd985157949a26a5287a4
Introduced via Ibc56abf. But the OOUI SelectWidget does have some
methods for this already.
This patch also updates some @mixins documentation.
Bug: T302965
Change-Id: Iffbb44d41586786a2165f8d7916f94a52ad19122
The rename in I5a16ab4 was done the exact same time a new usage was
introduced via Ibb717ca. Neither patch shows a conflict. Still there
is one.
I remove the extra `|| null` line because it is just not needed. We
don't need to set the property to null when it was already null.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: Id3f025786c9412e8c1946434113c41356da08098
Instead of the template that's currently selected. That's confusing,
e.g. when you click one of the search fields, search for a parameter,
can't fine it, and press ctrl+shift+d to add an undocumented
parameter. Or you navigate the list of parameters with the cursor
keys, can't find the parameter you are looking for, and press
ctrl+shift+d to add it.
Still falls back to the selection when the focus is outside of the
sidebar.
We suggest to merge this before UX review, and review it later in
demo time. It's easy to undo if necessary.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I9848dd0af4fe821526dafc18bbd7cb1ab0e68cfc
The need for something like this was anticipated in
I2bf43c7e83283f43e047229eb53c244918fcbb0c.
As of version 2.5.0 of Parsoid's output, if alternate text is missing
for an image but a caption is present and image isn't displaying the
caption (ie. it isn't a thumb or frame), then the text content of the
caption will be set as the alt attribute. Parsoid will then drop the
alt attribute when serializing if it matches the caption text, since
it's unnecessary.
However, if the caption is modified and the alt text isn't, the alt will
be serialized. This is likely to be unexpected to editor. They may
have missed that the both the caption and alt are populated in VE and
only edited one place.
Since all of the above is happening only for images where the caption
isn't visible, it doesn't appear to be a much used feature since, at
least for inline images, the experience of caption editing was already
less than optimal.
However, because of a quirk in how galleries are rendered in Parsoid,
this affects gallery caption editing, which is visible and presumably
used more often. See T268250 for a discussion on an improved gallery
structure. But for now, gallery images are effectively inline and set
the alternate text, thus subject to the above.
Here we add a checkbox so that the default is to ignore the alt if it's
the same as the caption. And only make use of it if it differed
originally or was explicitly unchecked to modify.
Bug: T311677
Change-Id: Idf297d8a98995971c5835b0cea56c3317a3626e2
Turns out we have two concepts, now represented by two methods:
1. A top-level part can only be moved or removed when it is actually
selected. This is relevant for the toolbar buttons and for the
keyboard shortcuts/hotkeys. We intentionally block the buttons
and hotkeys when a parameter is selected.
2. Adding a new part or parameter is always possible, no matter if a
top-level part or parameter is selected. This is again relevant
for the toolbar buttons and hotkeys.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I17caf8fce9d8f1ebe21660cf8c6d91ace8423490
The hotkey was only working when a top-level part was selected, not
when a parameter in a template was selected.
Some outdated helper methods are now marked as deprecated. They will
be replaced and removed in later patches.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I5ffe45fd00c36b97ee36dc0ba6831db5a941c731
This is a partial revert of Iaf089f4. It restores the old behavior:
* In case there is already a highlight in the parameter list, just
keep that. Usually there is no highlight at this point, but better
have this check in place to be sure.
* Otherwise always start at the top.
Jumping to the selection is confusing, esp. for keyboard-only users.
The argument goes like this:
* Let's say I'm in the middle of editing values on the right side of
the dialog.
* I want to navigate to the sidebar. How do I do this with the
keyboard? I use the tab key.
* Pressing tab also implies I move the selection to the next
parameter. And the next. Until I reach the end of the parameter
list. Then the selection stays there.
* When I finally reach the sidebar and tab into the parameter list,
the last parameter is selected. But this was merely a side-effect
of me navigating the dialog.
Such a "selection becomes highlighting" behavior was not specified
in T311204.
This patch is requested and approved by PM.
Bug: T312647
Bug: T311204
Change-Id: Ie5b5dfd4fca132050815e6182845ca23adb5f805
The main motivation is to get rid of the vague method name
"setParameter" that was previously used for three different methods
in three different classes. Now the three methods have three
different names.
Change-Id: I938de30b368daf6ce3385b2ed2bca98f316593e1
We would love to name this state "selected", but that term is already
used for a template parameter that is checked/used. The idea of "set"
was to have a list of parameters where one is "set". But the word is
confusing. I suggest "active page" because the entire purpose of the
blue selection is to highlight the currently active page (i.e. the
one you currently interact with on the right side of the dialog) in
the sidebar.
Change-Id: I5a16ab4c193ea05c21bb3bf89ada2ef550d8d6bc
1. Before, removePages() was calling setPage() with null. This makes
sense for removed top-level parts because these are really removed
from both sides of the dialog. Template parameters are never removed.
Only unchecked (and removed from the right side of the dialog, but
this is not what this code is about). When I navigate a parameter
list and uncheck a parameter I need the focus and highlighting to
stay.
2. We have a dedicated method when a parameter is unchecked. This
can check if the removed parameter is also the selected one (called
"set" in this code) and can reset this state. Without losing the
highlighting or anything else.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: Ibb717ca49cae805617ebee196937c79daa72f1c1
Optimization: Don't search for a checkbox that represents a not yet
named parameter placeholder. There is never one.
Fix: Store null, not undefined.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: I395008f15d13133ad456d0a77571b7aa1c7a7fc9
Steps to reproduce:
* Set a breakpoint or debug.log() at the start of
TransclusionOutlineWidget.setSelectionByPageName()
* Edit a multi-part template.
* Use the keyboard to navigate to a template name in the sidebar.
* Press space.
This is currently triggered twice. Let's get rid of the more obscure
one. It was introduced as part of Ic4ee673. I don't really know why.
Bug: T313207
Change-Id: I3ddc072f5d42c17249abc82026e0bf1a4be1dc6e
This also means we have to move the declaration/documentation of the
event up one level into the generic "part" widget.
Change-Id: I1b803201f8955b58136ee7f37c04c01edcd47395
The code that receives this event does not need to know that the
source is a "parameter". It's just some "item" in the sidebar. The
idea is to reuse the event for both top-level parts as well as
parameters. This will be done in the next patch.
Change-Id: I858040f5adf8e156b6013caaa527b3237b7bac0f
What I found is a single `$container.animate( animations )` that's
responsible for the misbehavior described in T312768.
This method is called from a few places. I think none of these places
benefits from making this an animation. This is often more distracting
than helpful, especially when navigating with the keyboard.
Bug: T312768
Change-Id: I90a80d6ae8c1b47ee22297d2520255cad890b90e
Fix setParameter() and let it (un)highlight parameters independent
from a selection (called "set" here).
Bug: T312925
Change-Id: Ie4e9ba94659f4f70160193ca6bec804f8a4473e4
Note how the two-pane layout was already handling the two events
identical:
sidebarPartSelected: 'onSidebarItemSelected',
templateParameterSelected: 'onSidebarItemSelected'
We move this knowledge up one level into the sidebar. Both actions
now trigger the same event.
This implies that we are now using the event formerly known as
"sidebarPartSelected" to act on both top-level parts as well as
parameters. We reflect this by renaming it to "sidebarItemSelected".
Change-Id: I9a2c95f91f05de7312d38ec4c8b360141a0c447d
This is not only fired when a parameter is added. It's also fired
when pressing spacebar on a parameter that already exists.
Change-Id: I245aa9f5938eb38c3a3f224a4d642d57068cf23b
This is not only fired when a parameter is checked or unchecked.
It's also not only fired when another parameter in the parameter
SelectWidget is selected. It's always fired just because the
spacebar is pressed. This is so we can scroll that parameter into
view.
Change-Id: Id621405b7ca3116cd4a06f474e49776d0830dccc
This regression from Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431.
Not calling the parent here was is essential, because when clicking
the checkboxes this event will trigger the focus of the whole widget.
That's not what we want in this case though. Also it seems we don't
need any of the logic from the parent and can get rid of that
complexity.
Bug: T312855
Bug: T312856
Bug: T312924
Change-Id: Ib3a2eeeb6d519dfa1bb627049f6b3a4708017e86
Triggers scroll in all situations where highlighting changes.
Including keyboard navigation.
Bug: T312542
Change-Id: I849f64c5cefe0cac3fde6e848b23b7b0cfc489ce
Introducing a set method to have a different state for a set
parameter and a highlighted one in the selection.
Allows us to remove a lot of workarounds for missusing the
highlight state and fixes several issues with these workarounds.
Main implications:
- Keyboard navigation and mouse hover now sets the grey highlight
- If a parameter is set (blue highlight) keyboard navigation returns
when focusing the SelectWidget
- If nothing is set keyboard navigation starts at the top after focus
- Unchecking a parameter using space will not influence the keyboard
focus in the list
- Highlighting a parameter with the mouse lets keyboard navigation
continue from there.
Bug: T312647
Bug: T311204
Bug: T312213
Depends-On: I385dca1d95033961d3844e888521750443e49c95
Change-Id: Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431
This prevents an invisible and unactionable focus target when the
parameter search field doesn't match anything.
Bug: T312547
Change-Id: Ib29913a547cd68649d29e28d921c4c1358bad7b8
We don't want to restore selection. Instead, we'll remove all
parameter selections onFocus, in a later patch.
This reverts commit 787d44af66.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: Ia1dc8061dfd1813a58befff5adc5c3882b54d8e2
This should be safe because selection is only set from use cases
in which we do want the sidebar scrolled to the matching item.
Bug: T290975
Change-Id: Ib0c66bb048768d633d0f638c775eba24cd652db8
When blurring out of keyboard parameter navigation, the
last-selected parameter will be highlighted again.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: I8b0fb667b44b324529d4c45c39bf21573517f989
Tabbing into the parameter select list should highlight the first
parameter, but focusing a checkbox by clicking it to uncheck should
not trigger this highlighting.
Copied from the superclass method.
Bug: T312014
Change-Id: Ia1fd450bad4861eb2815ca21eae69ee31e40ac08
New sidebar events take a `soft` parameter allowing reuse between
"hard" and "soft" selection and parameter add. The "hard" variant
causes a content-pane focus.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: Ic49718840ae56eb4cfab01ce964a2fbc2d8db63b
If nothing has been selected, the action buttons should be
initialized in a disabled state.
Bug: T311608
Change-Id: I32fee0d73f6e13e09dc421c944df73b79e0260bb
It seems that the controls widget was the only side-effect we still
needed for maintaining existing behavior.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I507dacef4e56946b836b0fca31effce611260aec
This patch does a few closely related things:
* Replace a direct dialog → sidebar access with dialog → layout →
sidebar.
* Move the misplaced removeButton.toggle() to a more appropriate
place.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I5a2802aab587a6f7de4681bce4e9961a064ef8ee
Value changes are triggerd and tracked from the parameter page and
change events will be forwared to the outline, if they are relevant.
Initial value is read from the model.
Bug: T308730
Change-Id: I0a3b0faf40aee44889404dcce31d850714360580
Removing a class name that's going to be deleted from places where
it's not strictly needed, e.g. comments.
Bug: T307188
Change-Id: Ifb14695d05510d2c0e25623afa99c4e84af3aaf9
This focuses on some scenarios that are
a) complex enough to be worth a test,
b) but simple enough so I don't need to spend hours on comming up
with a test setup. ;-)
This patch also simplifies the ARIA related code in
MWTransclusionOutlinePartWidget a bit.
* Check 1 of the 3 ARIA configs only. Only having one is already
helpful and should not be skipped.
* No need for the large conditional. setAriaDescribedBy() works fine
with undefined.
Bug: T291157
Change-Id: I142782ec9b96147de64497f4f6a373eae05b9c8e
Will be removed when parameters are added. Needs different margins
depending on beeing shown in the single transclusion mode without
header or on multiple transclusions.
Bug: T300710
Change-Id: Ieb95d7276aa4d4b0fcbb74f87ab734e4a393dc21
Before, the fallback algorithm was somewhat adaptive, trying harder and
harder the fewer CirrusSearch results have been found. This updated
algorithm guarantees that 10 results are shown.
Warning: You might see only 9 results. The reason is a bogus, unrelated
behavior in the mw.widgets.TitleWidget in core that's used as a base
class here. There is a "showMissing" option that's apparently enabled
by default, and prepends a non-existing title from the main namespace,
ignoring the "namespace" option. This extra result from the wrong
namespace is later dropped by the very same widget.
This code here sees 10 results before the bogus one is dropped.
Disabling "showMissing" causes other issues. We would need a series (?)
of custom hacks to work around all this, but this seems inappropriate.
Let's live with 9 for the moment.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I2c577c9ef2752b6c6cd360f4023e151e9272fcd5
The main advantage of this change is that it drops the assumption
that the index starts with 1. This is not necessarily the case when
we prepend extra search results. Dropping this assumption here allows
to simplify such code.
* The incoming list of pages is guaranteed to be an array.
* There is no point (any more) that could cause the array to become
sparse.
* Note we still make a copy of the `origPages` array at some point,
e.g. on `.filter()`.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: Ifbd92bb052155c613d2ca21ab6d54a0b3ef28c0c
This option is not only buggy (it just doesn't work when the namespace
option is set the same time), it is not useful in this context even
if it would work. It doesn't make much sense to suggest non-existing
templates in the context of the template dialog. If adding a
non-existing template really is what the user wants, they can still do
this by simply typing the name of the template and submitting the form.
We never need this to show up in the suggester below the input field.
The main advantage of this change is that is saves 1 useless API
request that's potentially done every time a key is pressed.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I903340a06d6e6490bb58f628f41903aa044ccb21
