Calling the linter is very slow as the result is not
cached. Extensions needing this (DiscussionTools) should
just call the Linter extension API directly.
Bug: T253799
Change-Id: I994b52ca70c29a32900741a36087f10144396720
This handles the minor edit and watch checkboxes, as well as any added
by extensions (e.g. FlaggedRevs).
Switching in the other direction already works fine, that is
implemented in ArticleTarget#getSaveFields.
It doesn't seem ideal to put this code into the constructor of
ve.init.mw.DesktopArticleTarget, but that's where we already have
similar logic for the edit summary. I filed T253696 about this.
Bug: T250388
Change-Id: Ia6a9c0465ed215e8f74b9fff4590593383e9a1e6
The first time we check, it's too early for any code that might have
wanted to call stopShowingWelcomeDialog() to have done so (because we
check synchronously after making that function available).
I'm not sure if checking twice like this is the best solution, or if it
would be better to defer the whole thing and only check once.
Change-Id: If5b88bb50c3becaa3d7931c8b8e4d0faed7b69d2
The difference is that metaitems are not visible on the editing
surface, and their exact position is not preserved when the paragraph
containing them is edited.
This behavior is desirable for e.g. categories, but not for
<noinclude> and related tags, which are intentionally placed in
specific places in the text.
Note that we don't really have any editing interface for these nodes
yet. But you can see them (and they come with descriptions and links
to documentation pages), and delete or copy-paste them.
Bug: T250937
Change-Id: I104e7abbd650567df0e59813653c46a66d955d58
By default, many browsers permit resizing the textarea in both
dimensions; however, the SaveDialog doesn’t handle horizontal resizing
very well (the textarea is no longer centered and the options don’t
adapt to the new width), so add some CSS to limit the resizing to
vertical only.
Change-Id: I91bf63357237ddc2e3ede8e661480ab0cb48d10e
In 92c3055628 I changed `sectionId > 0`
to `sectionId !== '0'`. That was actually a mistake, as Parsoid's
section IDs can be negative, which indicates pseudo-sections, which
may not have headings.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Specs/HTML/2.1.0#Headings_and_Sections
Bug: T252238
Change-Id: I9133d4365a71d6db1fa58b69ae3b970166d15c1e
Previously we didn't deactivate them, so if you opened VE, then
switched to NWE, then exited the editor, all three tabs would appear
active.
Change-Id: I904d6daf2896ceadf004f5e57a88c2359f33fd44
Code in ve.dm.MWTransclusionNode (which ve.dm.MWSignatureNode extends)
expects the node data to have an 'attributes' property.
We could override a bunch of methods to fix this, or add checks in the
original code, but it seems more future-proof to instead ensure that
the property exists.
Bug: T248585
Change-Id: I5bd721ca73605a396509669145b740db7283afd3
This is now consistent with all other events.
Needed for I9904e8af4a60b0f5e9a6e263cd4fd8e1e3fd1f98.
Change-Id: If52aa9d619eac08456874fc75c0f6e1adff01246
And factor out the common code for using a preference with a fallback to
localStorage or a cookie.
Bug: T235566
Change-Id: Ibb983319edcd2987225fe89677fd10e3ff8f9df6
Use hasContent to
1. Catch cases where the document is empty, e.g. <p></p>
2. Avoid having to use the converter
Change-Id: Ib1bb36824ca871e535bef38cef8137fdfb81b53e
This allows code in other extensions to suppress the welcome dialog
temporarily (just for that one page view), without touching the user's
preferences.
Bug: T235566
Change-Id: Ief6545289cf59fda851aa944b059994abd90253e
Move shouldShowWelcomeDialog() and stopShowingWelcomeDialog() from
DesktopArticleTarget to DesktopArticleTarget.init, and use them to
deduplicate code in init that manages the wikitext welcome dialog.
Look for both the vehidebetadialog and hidewelcomedialog URL params.
The code in DesktopArticleTarget used vehidebetadialog, but the code in
init for the wikitext welcome dialog used hidewelcomedialog.
Bug: T249954
Change-Id: I19f1a2da36bc65addb52811c3d3c73c1259bc8f5
The base class doesn't use it, it only defines it, and
DesktopArticleTarget is the only subclass that uses it.
MobileArticleTarget calls it, but also overrides it to be a no-op.
Change-Id: Ib3feea94844f4e1ed71dccece7657450516cac89
Factor out the logic for whether the WelcomeDialog should be shown into
its own method, and write it in a less confusing way. Do the same thing
with the logic for setting the preference/storage/cookie for hiding the
WelcomeDialog.
This makes maybeShowWelcomeDialog() much simpler, and removes duplicated
code in DesktopArticleTarget.
There is one minor change in behavior: if the WelcomeDialog is
suppressed using the URL parameter, that no longer causes the preference
to be updated as if the dialog had been shown.
Change-Id: I1d4f912c5f6bd7a2bbad2b209b97c3ec1f250a07
