This prevents an invisible and unactionable focus target when the
parameter search field doesn't match anything.
Bug: T312547
Change-Id: Ib29913a547cd68649d29e28d921c4c1358bad7b8
We don't want to restore selection. Instead, we'll remove all
parameter selections onFocus, in a later patch.
This reverts commit 787d44af66.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: Ia1dc8061dfd1813a58befff5adc5c3882b54d8e2
This should be safe because selection is only set from use cases
in which we do want the sidebar scrolled to the matching item.
Bug: T290975
Change-Id: Ib0c66bb048768d633d0f638c775eba24cd652db8
When blurring out of keyboard parameter navigation, the
last-selected parameter will be highlighted again.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: I8b0fb667b44b324529d4c45c39bf21573517f989
Tabbing into the parameter select list should highlight the first
parameter, but focusing a checkbox by clicking it to uncheck should
not trigger this highlighting.
Copied from the superclass method.
Bug: T312014
Change-Id: Ia1fd450bad4861eb2815ca21eae69ee31e40ac08
New sidebar events take a `soft` parameter allowing reuse between
"hard" and "soft" selection and parameter add. The "hard" variant
causes a content-pane focus.
Bug: T311987
Change-Id: Ic49718840ae56eb4cfab01ce964a2fbc2d8db63b
If nothing has been selected, the action buttons should be
initialized in a disabled state.
Bug: T311608
Change-Id: I32fee0d73f6e13e09dc421c944df73b79e0260bb
It seems that the controls widget was the only side-effect we still
needed for maintaining existing behavior.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I507dacef4e56946b836b0fca31effce611260aec
This patch does a few closely related things:
* Replace a direct dialog → sidebar access with dialog → layout →
sidebar.
* Move the misplaced removeButton.toggle() to a more appropriate
place.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I5a2802aab587a6f7de4681bce4e9961a064ef8ee
Value changes are triggerd and tracked from the parameter page and
change events will be forwared to the outline, if they are relevant.
Initial value is read from the model.
Bug: T308730
Change-Id: I0a3b0faf40aee44889404dcce31d850714360580
Removing a class name that's going to be deleted from places where
it's not strictly needed, e.g. comments.
Bug: T307188
Change-Id: Ifb14695d05510d2c0e25623afa99c4e84af3aaf9
This focuses on some scenarios that are
a) complex enough to be worth a test,
b) but simple enough so I don't need to spend hours on comming up
with a test setup. ;-)
This patch also simplifies the ARIA related code in
MWTransclusionOutlinePartWidget a bit.
* Check 1 of the 3 ARIA configs only. Only having one is already
helpful and should not be skipped.
* No need for the large conditional. setAriaDescribedBy() works fine
with undefined.
Bug: T291157
Change-Id: I142782ec9b96147de64497f4f6a373eae05b9c8e
Will be removed when parameters are added. Needs different margins
depending on beeing shown in the single transclusion mode without
header or on multiple transclusions.
Bug: T300710
Change-Id: Ieb95d7276aa4d4b0fcbb74f87ab734e4a393dc21
Before, the fallback algorithm was somewhat adaptive, trying harder and
harder the fewer CirrusSearch results have been found. This updated
algorithm guarantees that 10 results are shown.
Warning: You might see only 9 results. The reason is a bogus, unrelated
behavior in the mw.widgets.TitleWidget in core that's used as a base
class here. There is a "showMissing" option that's apparently enabled
by default, and prepends a non-existing title from the main namespace,
ignoring the "namespace" option. This extra result from the wrong
namespace is later dropped by the very same widget.
This code here sees 10 results before the bogus one is dropped.
Disabling "showMissing" causes other issues. We would need a series (?)
of custom hacks to work around all this, but this seems inappropriate.
Let's live with 9 for the moment.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I2c577c9ef2752b6c6cd360f4023e151e9272fcd5
The main advantage of this change is that it drops the assumption
that the index starts with 1. This is not necessarily the case when
we prepend extra search results. Dropping this assumption here allows
to simplify such code.
* The incoming list of pages is guaranteed to be an array.
* There is no point (any more) that could cause the array to become
sparse.
* Note we still make a copy of the `origPages` array at some point,
e.g. on `.filter()`.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: Ifbd92bb052155c613d2ca21ab6d54a0b3ef28c0c
This option is not only buggy (it just doesn't work when the namespace
option is set the same time), it is not useful in this context even
if it would work. It doesn't make much sense to suggest non-existing
templates in the context of the template dialog. If adding a
non-existing template really is what the user wants, they can still do
this by simply typing the name of the template and submitting the form.
We never need this to show up in the suggester below the input field.
The main advantage of this change is that is saves 1 useless API
request that's potentially done every time a key is pressed.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: I903340a06d6e6490bb58f628f41903aa044ccb21
This separates the two steps:
1. See if items in the list of `origPages` miss their `.index`
property, and add it if possible.
2. Later code doesn't need to care about redirects any more.
Note that `origPages` is not used for anything else. And even if,
it's not wrong to have the index for each search result on both the
redirect and the redirect target.
Change-Id: I12135f0430c944b4e33c49ece7779d7c3bb6c211
This is not a pageid, but a simple numeric index in an array. Luckily
it doesn't make a practical difference for this particluar way of
iterating something.
Change-Id: I7ec9ace00d4fba7adde17670058a0365b30f5617
The result is guaranteed to be in formatversion=2, where the list of
pages is an array, not an object.
Change-Id: Ic73a68c3e249a70108a6a19a89f4ff6c475794ed
This code is optimized for the 2 most relevant use cases:
1. When Cirrus finds 10 results, we still want to search for the top 1
prefix match. This is critical for templates like !!. This will appear
at the top. unshiftPages() makes sure the limit of 10 is enforced.
2. When Cirrus fails to find anything, we search for 10 prefix matches
and use these instead.
The code can also handle everything in between. For example, when
Cirrus finds 5 results, we search for 5 more prefix matches and add
them when Cirrus missed them. The total number in the end might be 5 to
10 depending on the number of duplicates. This is intentional. Why?
Let's say we always search for 10 prefix matches and add them to the
top when Cirrus missed them. This might remove _all_ Cirrus results.
This shouldn't happen. This extra code is only to fill in glaring gaps,
not to replace Cirrus. 5 results are fine.
Bug: T303524
Change-Id: Ib0471795124c0c7001b6901edaf8e7b380e426b1
There is already some kind of "fallback" to prefixsearch. We always
check if the top-1 prefixsearch result is part of the result set.
Because of this the current worst-case scenario is that only this
1 result is shown.
This patch implements a full fallback to prefixsearch. But only when
there are 0 CirrusSearch results. Further tuning might be done in
later patches.
Bug: T304925
Change-Id: I1927eedad60c9b9ac2021481a85376c08ccf6fdb
.test() is the dedicated syntax for a boolean "does match? yes/no?"
check. .match() returns an array of matches, or null. This is just not
needed in these situations.
Change-Id: Ibb996ab843d1a6c7d7af98d6a112990665d543b2
We ended mixing two concepts in a single method:
* We need a method that allows us to create the parameter list widget
when it's needed, even if it's empty. This is relevant when a template
is entirely empty, and the first parameter is added. This wasn't
working. Instead the parameter list was created with all parameters.
* On initialization we either want all parameters to be shown, or only
used ones. But this code is only needed once, on initialization. I
ended inlining this code in this patch.
Bug: T300640
Bug: T304046
Change-Id: I6620a870e4420dcb8fecf522b3274458eeec891d
