In the core MediaWiki editor, the detailed messages about page
protection are only shown when the user is allowed to edit the page;
otherwise, a generic permission error is shown. Do the same here.
Change-Id: Ia0ca52b9bf556354218b2aa91f141b429b0c5880
Explanation of what this code was for: T227628#5339392
As noted on that task, our behavior is actually unintuitive and
distracting, and iOS Safari limitations prevent us from doing it
better.
This reverts commit 600e369347.
Bug: T227628
Change-Id: Id1a5eebd06e4218e3e102165c60791999293d273
When a template does not have user-provided TemplateData documentation,
the TemplateData API falls back to extracting possible parameters from the raw wikitext
to generate an API response with a list of potential parameters. However, it also
sets the "notemplatedata" field in the response, causing the VisualEditor to think
the response contains no useful information and ignore it. This appears to have been
an unintended side-effect of I97a1bfc9f9ead082a673a91b9d2053630a90309c.
This patch ensures that the VisualEditor will correctly consider such responses from
TemplateData by modifying ve.dm.MWTransclusionModel to check if the response contains
a parameter map. Some unit tests were added for the class to verify this behavior.
Bug: T243868
Change-Id: I72005880d9301a53224473900efe2917379e8708
This opens up the API so that other tools can use it without being
forced to tag those edits as being from VE.
Also, document that tags is a working parameter that can be passed
through to the edit API.
Bug: T242184
Change-Id: I2c1d0f8d69bc03e5c1877c790247e165f160e966
Replace Title::userCan with PermissionManager::userCan.
Replace Title::getUserPermissionsErrors with
PermissionManager::getPermissionErrors.
Change-Id: I1afec4ba62185c3cd555a10ae35cef01b7194221
When mw.libs.ve.diffLoader#fetchRevision was calling this method, we
were accidentally making no query at all if RESTBase wasn't in use.
Change-Id: Ia98343aa1ba7f4f3be0c1a8ee5864653c429fb82
In many places we check whether VE is available before doing things
(init.isVisualAvailable). This variable includes checks for whether
the page is wikitext, etc. Now it will also include checking whether
VE is enabled in user preferences.
In almost all places where init.isVisualAvailable is used, we were
already also checking if VE is enabled, so this doesn't affect the
behavior. But notably, we didn't do it when showing the option to
switch to VE in the welcome dialog and in the toolbar, causing T243723.
Changing init.isVisualAvailable this way makes it consistent with
init.isWikitextAvailable, which has always included a checking whether
NWE is enabled in user preferences.
Bug: T243723
Change-Id: Ie174bc3f16bceb29cb155b9223e0acef70167fd6
When NWE is enabled but VE is supposed to be unavailable on the page
(e.g. in talk namespaces), do not show the option to switch to VE in
the welcome dialog.
This is relevant if new users use NWE, due to config like below
(we use this on WMF Office wiki):
$wgDefaultUserOptions['visualeditor-newwikitext'] = true;
Change-Id: Iee8c3d3604a13dcd20efa713e49461ba9b885749
This code works perfectly on mobile now, I believe change
4fb17205b6 fixed that.
Note that the dialog is currently never shown due to the override
in MobileArticleTarget, but I tested after removing it.
Change-Id: I305a01fc78366a3d2d13662e6d71711864e0dffc
New changes:
b609a378c Localisation updates from https://translatewiki.net.
908602288 Localisation updates from https://translatewiki.net.
13a8f4092 Update OOUI to v0.36.3
Change-Id: Ib615394fac35a007d98eca80468a256912f0bcce
* Query permission errors for 'edit' and 'create' in the same way,
and consistently with how MediaWiki core EditPage does it.
* Prefer using Title::getUserPermissionsErrors() instead of custom
code for user blocks. The result is the same, except for an extra
line like "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the
following reason:".
Note that this loses the 'type' => 'block' property on each notice,
which was previously used to track when a block notice was shown.
This was however removed in 96de1353d3,
and could probably be re-implemented by using the root 'blockinfo'
property anyway.
* When Title::getUserPermissionsErrors() returns multiple messages
(for example, you're blocked *and* the page is protected),
display them all in a list instead of only the first one, using
OutputPage::formatPermissionsErrorMessage().
That method returns wikitext, which we have to parse ourselves. This
is a bit silly, but I found this approach in SpecialChangeContentModel
in MediaWiki core, so it should be fine.
Change-Id: Ifaf95d8aab836e45665b1fbdf98dd1980a867d8c
The message ends with "The latest log entry is provided below for
reference:", but we were not providing it. Use the same code as
'protectedpagewarning' and 'semiprotectedpagewarning', which behave
the same.
Change-Id: Ibe5463aa3d93cd1d6d6e3c0b9da82bfa2c813f86
The following sniffs are failing and were disabled:
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingDocumentationPrivate
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingParamName
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingParamTag
Change-Id: If59d450236a7d1afa3c6a05536abea819535f984
New changes:
b90385a44 Update OOUI to v0.36.2
95cf15506 doc: Point to gerrit, not Phabricator Diffusion
57689b9ed doc: Update copyright statement for new year
Change-Id: I3edd80c990101e4ba33163b1da5a45c300654977
It's supposed to be non-editable but deletable text, like mw:Entity.
We decided to handle them this way in 2015 but never implemented it
(T94509). Currently, accidentally editing text inside of
mw:DisplaySpace node causes the changes to be lost when saving.
Bug: T241906
Change-Id: I78a0cc7a75061a7eefb8b677898b5756326615d6
