This happened one time before and was fixed via T212419. It now came
back after I2670331, a patch for T214861 that made the title parser
accept more links than before.
This patch implements a decision tree that goes as follows:
1. If it's a link to another page, it can't be anything but a page
preview, as having a peek into another page is effectively the
definition of a page preview.
2. Otherwise it's probably a reference preview, but only if:
* It's a link with a jump mark.
* The link is actually marked as being a "reference".
* Reference previews are enabled.
3. If neither of these definitions fit, do nothing. Note this is not
"hiding errors" we would be able to fix in this code. There are many
ways to manually arrange wikitext in a way that it looks like one or
the other, without fulfilling all requirements. Unfortunately the
user who would see error message or dysfunctional popups would not
be the same as the user who wrote such wikitext.
Bug: T216683
Change-Id: I8d021f19ddc73a261e6a0c62959ddd0cb1d3182d
See the discussion at I6bd7acc. In this codebase it was decided to not
use "classic" JavaScript, but document it with the benefits TypeScript
comes with. Since I27b5cb0 a dev dependency is in place that makes the
upper case JQuery type work.
All the lower-case jQuery this patch happens to touch have been placed
by me, not knowing better at this point.
Change-Id: I76ef8eabaf4850f07b140dac6f489df37422263e
These are annotations for ESLint as described at:
https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring#specifying-globals
I'm not sure where the `…: false` comes from. I assume it is a mistake
and does not have an effect.
I tried to move these annotations closer to the line they are about in
case there is only one line. And move it to the top when there is more
than one line using the global.
Change-Id: I4bd112c5fddd8a97d829a9b91707b8eb7cd7a332
An id="…" can potentially be used to target elements individually, manipulate
them, or show them in another context. This is done with the elements in the
file pointer-mask.svg. But not with any other image.
The file-rule="…" only has an effect on shapes that intersect with itself.
This is not the case for this basic "L" shape.
If you think this is fine, I might look at the original OOUI icons as well
and apply the same optimizations on them. But there are 800+ of them to be
looked at, and I want to invest the time only if you think it's worth it.
Change-Id: Ifa4bd60a436e58d3a7c1536f8201fe76fbdac57c
While reviewing the code of the reference endpoint I found it encodes
two CSS class names, "mw-reference-text" and "reference-text". So far
our scraping gateway only implemented one.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/GMOA/repository/master/
This patch also extracts a piece of code to a named function. This makes
it much easier to read, I feel.
Bug: T214908
Change-Id: I9d1bb1f4c21eb9d57a6b763ca1f756e6cf7049e0
These icons are currently unused because the gateway does not deliver
the necessary information. This will be used starting with I6223cbb.
This patch aims to introduce all resources needed by the later.
Bug: T214908
Change-Id: Ie0c3c059222700169f2605c3123554c74d974256
The definition of "self-link" in this context is an <a href="…">
element that points to the exact same URL as the current document's
location, excluding a possibly different #… fragment. This is typically
the case when the <a> element does not contain a full URL, but something
like href="#fragment". JavaScript's HTMLAnchorElement.href getter
automatically expands this to be a full URL.
Example:
var a = document.createElement( 'A' );
a.href = '#test';
console.log( a.href );
Notes:
* This new code assumes the wgPageName setting properly reflects the
page name requested via the current document's location. Core does
give us this guarantee.
* The only URL element that is intentionally not compared is the
protocol.
* This accidentially fixes T215899 as well, because the namespace check
is now bypassed for self-links (as it should).
Bug: T214861
Bug: T215899
Change-Id: I2670331cbbdebf7dc9fc70d7342724534f9f54ec
This patch also removes misplaced empty lines at the beginning of a
scope. In PHP code we even have a sniff for these. In JavaScript we
don't, but I suggest to be consistent about this.
Change-Id: Ic104ae8fe176da1dafa9bc783402adecb71de1f0
According to the standard.
Note: In a previous patch I removed the <?xml …?> line. This conflicts
with what https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/SVG
suggests. However, I think the removal is ok in this particular case
because this file will never be shown as an image, and never be shown
standalone. Instead, it will be inserted in the documents DOM. The XML
header doesn't matter anyway then.
Change-Id: If23ad54985abb30f8c92500546bd04eeca44fab3
I decided to keep the comments because they are sooo helpful, but
tried to shorten them a bit. The biggest change is the indention with
tabs and the much more compact <path> elements. The shapes are the
exact same. I manually confirmed this for all four.
Change-Id: I2d1294c9ae7e398dcbe2d111c42848d17be8a67e
I tested this with all 16 possible combinations:
* The pointer can show up in all 4 corners.
* The popup can contain a thumbnail or not. The code for the pointer
is very different then, because the SVG masks are only relevant in
this scenario.
* The thumbnail can be tall or not.
* I even tested tall popups without a thumbnail. This is a combination
that is impossible in production scenarios.
I found 3 issues. This patch fixes 2 of them:
* The pointer is misplaced in the bottom-right corner when the popup
does not have a thumbnail (as reported in T215194).
* The pointer is misplaced in the upper-right corner when the popup
shows a thumbnail.
* The pointer in the upper-right corner is gray instead of white when
the popup is tall, but does not show a thumbnail. As this is not
relevant in production, I did not fixed it.
It seems both misplacements are because of the same reason: For some
reason, calculations are done based on the assumption the popup would
be 300px wide, but it is 320px wide.
Note I did not just added 20 everywhere, but manually alligned the
pointer triangles so they are placed exactly the same distance from
the corner as in the three other corners.
Note I did not tested this (yet) in RTL scenarios.
Bug: T215194
Change-Id: If0ca63d4d4b6e8083c7de1517fe32f49671a40e6
As well as:
* Simplify the selectGatewayType() function a bit. Or was this
intentional?
* Remove a TODO we don't need any more, at least not in this file.
Change-Id: I5528f0012cbaf8b4e88e22c7e2a8d87bf027e8f1
We discovered a bunch of possible solutions (see previous patch sets),
including replacing the `$( document )` selector with a more specific
one. That idea does not pass the linter.
Very late I realized the original selector starts with
`#mw-content-text`. This heavily limits where popups are allowed to
appear: really only in the main text content area.
We should limit reference popups to the exact same scope.
This fixes the issue described in T215195. Before, the content of the
popup was covered by the selector. Reference links *inside* the popup
would trigger another popup, which makes the current popup disappear.
Now the popup itself is not covered by these event handlers any more.
Bug: T215195
Change-Id: I142aee68abbd57ca321873855fef9209e0db0bbf
There are a few cheap checks done before this regular expression is
even needed, most notably the check for a pretty URL (without query
parameters). Since the vast majority of links processed by this parser
are pretty, I believe this optimization is worth it.
Change-Id: I730b87dc010161e8bc3f311c517293c0ad553326
This is now possible since the render functions return jQuery objects.
All this code is exclusively used in the pagePreview.js file, and
doesn't need to make the already very big renderer.js file even
bigger.
Note the tests for all renderers have always been collected in a
single file. That's why the test case does not move.
Change-Id: I0c24638751c5f0e93d2bc0f3f4bb61fa0cf50d15
To make sure that we enable the link highlighting in the Cite extension we want
to trigger the click handler on the original footnote link. This is done by
passing the id of the source element to the model and the renderer.
Bug: T213905
Change-Id: I0bd59ac326269f3c0850946851fb79b611dc2a57
When we started reorganising the code around the gateway selection
we forgot moving the docs and typedefs from the (now) more specific
page.js file to the (now new) index.js. - This patch fixes that.
See also I5efa9fb8f63f1487c627eb9a3f1fe47f43c611cc
Change-Id: I7b3582882247e22497d3a37b896a8a7c9950cf0d
This CSS class is used by the regular wikitext content area, and used
by certain CSS selectors (e.g. the external web link arrow).
The DOM structure for each popup is (intentionally) created outside
of this scope, at the end of the current page's body. This works
great for page previews because the do *not* want to share any styles
with the rest of the page. But reference previews want to do this.
In this patch I also remove the inner <span>. It was misplaced (note
the name) and resulted in block elements nested in an inline element.
Bug: T214463
Change-Id: I740e37a2ed929edf971b348fbf20e5fb12012d37
This gets rid of a little bit of code duplication, and makes the
interfaces all conform to one standard again after I05ed4b8 left them
in a little inconsistent (but properly documented) state.
Bug: T214970
Change-Id: If8407c1a48aff1cb31fc2e74b3c2b846e79a3cb5
As discussed in Iaadcce9. This does have a few benefits:
* Less code in the already pretty big render.js file.
* The code setting the target attribute is much closer to where it
belongs: in the file that specifies how the content of a reference
popup should look and behave.
* The class name "mwe-popups-extract" is not mentioned in two different
files, but in the same.
Note this changes the signature of this src/ui/templates/… file to not
return an HTML string any more, but a jQuery object. The other templates
still return strings. I believe this is fine, and not that much of a
difference anyway. The signatures don't need to be identical. And the
jQuery object still represents the exact same HTML as before.
If it helps we could change all templates/… signatures accordingly.
Could be done in this or a separate patch.
Bug: T213908
Bug: T214970
Change-Id: I05ed4b886f79c5ae748f53ab9fed965dfd217620
This solves the (I believe) only regression we introduced: A bad fake
reference like <span class="reference">[[Other article#Section]]</span>
showed a page preview for the "Other article" before we introduced
reference previews, but would have shown nothing after I9ec57e0.
Checking if the link is a self-link solves this and possibly more related
issues. Only self-links can point to a footnote on the same page.
Manually created fake-references like
<span class="reference">[[#Section]]</span> still have a chance to show
nothing in case the manually created HTML does not strictly follow the
expectations in the gateway. There is not much we can do about this. We
should not accept any arbitrary HTML but need to make at least *some*
assumptions.
Bug: T214970
Change-Id: I86e91bf45c3ae4c6a4086f7f1c7b1280fd400d17
We updated this documentation just recently via Ie370cfe. We followed
what the createModel() function does. But this is not the only way a
PreviewModel object can be created. Reference previews, for example,
don't use it.
Instead of following createModel(), I checked what the different popup
types actually use.
Bug: T214970
Change-Id: I2c4293a48387836dc30e18d10d952b4a26e6f2b5
This is mainly done to increase testabilty of this part. I am a bit
unsure if this should ( have been ) integrated in the former index.js
that's now the page.js. - See also the refactoring done before.
Bug: T214971
Change-Id: I90d0441510bc1ec0b4900a392afcbaff6a552377
This is as preparation to introduce a gateway switch that decides if the
page or reference gatway should be selected. Moving that code to it's own
realm makes that path better testable.
Bug: T214971
Change-Id: I5efa9fb8f63f1487c627eb9a3f1fe47f43c611cc
This installs a series of safety nets:
* The selector [href*="#"] skips links without a fragment.
* It's still possible that a fragment exists, but is empty.
mwTitle.getFragment() checks this.
* The gateway does not assume the element exists, but checks this first.
If there is no such element, the gateway aborts the request in a way
that no error popup is shown. This is currently only possible with the
`{ textStatus: 'abort', xhr: { readyState: 0 } }` response as seen in
this patch. We might need to introduce a new, more clean way to silently
quit a fetchPreviewForTitle() call.
* The test for the reference gateway finally covers the scraping code.
Bug: T214970
Bug: T214971
Change-Id: I9ec57e0fbb0d21beaaa7b359c1c2bef64d2c14f5
Including tests for all situations.
I believe it is impossible or extremely hard to actually abuse any of
these places. All these data are not extracted from the current page, but
delivered either by MediaWiki's api.php or a RESTful endpoint, as
configured via $wgPopupsGateway and $wgPopupsRestGatewayEndpoint. A
possible attacker would need to write it's own endpoint (which must either
run on the same server or somehow ignore the CSRF token), and set the
value of mw.config.values.wgPopupsRestGatewayEndpoint on the client to
this endpoint – which requires just *another* attack vector to be able to
do this.
It's "the right thing"(tm) to escape all this anyway.
I found two possibly relevant security reviews of this extension, T88171
and T129177, resolved in 2015 and 2016.
Bug: T88171
Bug: T129177
Bug: T214754
Bug: T214971
Change-Id: I1d118c9ccaea434a253a772d18139b9b077118ab
This will affect all links, including [[Other page#Fragment]] for
example. But it will not have much of an effect there. The mw.Title
class is able to understand strings like "Other page#Fragment". All
old code calls title.getPrefixedDb() on the result. This will *not*
include the fragment. Only the new code will use title.getFragment().
I made sure this does not affect regular page previews, even when the
link is something like [[Other page#Fragment]].
Bug: T213415
Change-Id: I15611a44aa0477cc5e48ee4b12aae3cd981d977c
I tried hard to keep the CSS as small and robust as possible. The
icon will be align with the text by adding a negativ margin. With
that we also decided against using RTL and LTR specific icons that
are positioned at the edge of the canvas for now.
Bug: T213907
Change-Id: I98888114e1c50e249cf31e71749323bd4f69da3f
I guess both is fine: either having the default in the gateway (as it
was before), or in the renderer (as this patch proposes). I, personally,
feel better with having it closer to where it is needed. This way it's
not possible to accidentially deliver a model object with an empty title.
The renderer will catch this.
At the moment we don't know exactly how we will fetch other titles (e.g.
"Book").
This change is split from I15611a4 where it was a little misplaced.
It also includes a test for the default fallback title.
Bug: T213907
Change-Id: I8ec3ddc21a417da7f95feff7b080cbd60d5472e7
Including tests. I also changed the title to include quotes as well,
even if not critical in that case.
Bug: T214754
Change-Id: I2f92a5714f7adc229a003f9167bcc9afdbc55583
Special characters that have a meaning in one of the many different input
formats jQuery accepts must be escaped.
The real-world use-case are references like <ref name=":1"> with a colon.
But it's many more characters that need escaping. See
http://api.jquery.com/category/selectors/
Note this patch misses a test. I already uploaded I9ec57e0 to fix the
currently incomplete tests. But I can't make it work. How do I create an
element in the test environment so that jQuery finds it?
I suggest to merge this and continue working on the tests later, because
this is currently one of the most annoying issues that makes all testing
unreliable.
Bug: T214710
Change-Id: Ifb5fe896936078f799298ac803d019d9caa048c8
The need for this is more a sign for a broken specification than an
actual issue with this code. But better be sure than sorry. More
details at
https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/
Bug: T214776
Change-Id: Idbcfae6d146fbbe3bff730239329beeb3455e18c
This is documented at http://usejsdoc.org/tags-type.html, but not in many
other places, especially not in the JSDuck documentation.
The {!…} syntax means "can not be null". This is the default anyway.
The {?…} syntax means nullable. In a few situation is was used when a
parameter can be undefined. I decided to remove it everywhere and replace
it with {…|null} when appropriate, because this is much more explicit. Less
syntax to remember.
Note I'm intentionally not using the […] syntax when a parameter is followed
by non-optional parameters. Actually skipping a parameter in such a situation
would mess the parameter order up. Having optional parameters not at the end
is sometimes used as a feature in JavaScript code, but not in this codebase,
as far as I can see.
Change-Id: Ie370cfe08c32d1af5b0341951bed044fc3511c57
Excluding tests for the renderer which keeps failing. This will be
readded in a later patch.
Bug: T213415
Bug: T213908
Change-Id: If79fa3d0a7a20f121b1ceda6e0e33ad691b1ad30
It's not exclusively about page summaries any more.
We had a few suggestions in mind:
* get, fetch, request, or issueRequest. But I feel these are all to
generic and don't describe well what the method does. As a reminder:
It expects a Title object and returns a promise, which returns a
PreviewModel object, which contains an HTML "extract".
* fetchPreview? I feel this can still mean to many things.
* fetchPreviewModel? But we don't really need to repeat that it will
return a model object.
So I went for fetchPreviewForTitle. What do you think?
Bug: T213415
Change-Id: Icb32c63cec82f72453dc1507c9f8b8d461fd4f4c
This adds support for preview popups on reference/footnotes from
the Cite extension. For that a new preview type was introduced and
integrated into the existing structures.
The essential starting points were this code comes into action are
added behind the feature flag introduced in the previous patches.
Bug: T213415
Change-Id: Ie0ccb03117bd654373d0f458b62cc52018361c67
Most of the code is exported because is is tested separately. But
these are all tested via createPreviewWithType(). I think it's just a
minor mistake to have these exported.
Change-Id: Ic4f4dc40fd95a60aba45cb5aa3fcbb6e3bc8c386
This is split from the current draft patch Ie0ccb03. This is part of a
series of very small patches that prepare the code for new types of popups.
We decided to not add code for other types of popups to the existing
createGateway() function, but introduce new files and functions instead.
Renaming, for example, the existing `gateway` variable name will make it
much more obvious which of the future gateways does what.
Bug: T213415
Change-Id: Ifcbc3ba53d0ab9ef67adf1f314defc76b4f89e89
This is split from the current draft patch Ie0ccb03. This is part of a
series of very small patches that prepare the code for new types of popups.
Bug: T213415
Change-Id: I4f4392057f6d3eff78409c8b6f49898c8be45d3e