This has lead to confusion where 'visual' as been translated
as 'VisualEditor', and 'source' has been translated as 'wikitext'
(although in the latter case that may be the least confusing
translation possible for some languages).
Change-Id: Ifa7897dfb9bafd8fe240fd84afc92ba88b978944
This got lost when the watchlist updating code was refactored
out into controller.js, as it assumes that 'data' (the post data)
is still available.
Bug: T261362
Change-Id: Id274e7b8518b62dddbc3d4095d9f6cab17aa17cd
As we do in VE, extract the revid from the document.
Unlike in VE we don't need to throw an error if there is
a mis-match, as we will likely be able to make the edit anyway.
Just use the ID we got from the document.
Log a warning if there is ever an ID mis-match so we
can evaluate if this check is actually needed.
Change-Id: I94c37980524a9faabac49495903a5262387af562
When a comment ended before the end of a paragraph, the next
comment would begin right there in the middle of the paragraph.
This could result in the detected indentation level of that
comment being incorrect, and replies being inserted in wrong
places, as seen in the 'signatures-funny' test case.
The code moved to the parser was previously repeated twice in
addListItem() and addReplyLink(), which should have been a hint
that something isn't quite right.
Also, fix the code guarding against overlapping signatures,
now that signatures may not be at the end of a comment.
Bug: T260855
Change-Id: Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94
We were accidentally resolving the promise with `undefined`, rather
than rejecting it. This later caused "TypeError: Cannot read property
'linterrors' of undefined" in controller#checkCommentOnPage.
Bug: T260294
Change-Id: I29418988023d86140cfa110c0c348059b293a716
Causes page corruption, in a new way we haven't seen before.
* Revert "Move page updating logic to controller.js"
This reverts commit 54fdc6de06.
* Revert "ReplyWidget: Move clear methods from #teardown to #clear"
This reverts commit 9b811a94e0.
* Revert "ApiDiscussionToolsEdit: Do not pass 'basetimestamp'"
This reverts commit 7de5938a6f.
* Revert "Use DOMCompat::getOuterHTML instead of doc->saveHTML()"
This reverts commit 7b2448d2f0.
* Revert "CommentController: Remove remains of client-side edit conflict handling"
This reverts commit 2d038af705.
* Revert "Restore error message for when comment is deleted while replying"
This reverts commit 655c0526d6.
* Revert "Use transcluded from API to avoid ever fetching Parsoid DOM in client"
This reverts commit 9d0fc184fe.
* Revert "Create a 'transcludedfrom' API endpoint"
This reverts commit 5d8f3b9051.
* Revert "Edit API for replies"
This reverts commit 8829a1a412.
Bug: T259855
Change-Id: I6419408c6194ec0afa6b8ee604b12c1a24c6ac7b
Expand the 'signatures-funny' test case with more examples, which
don't behave correctly.
Follow-up commits I04a8ea09401e06f2d4bb1f226f17eb528b29ed95 and
Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94 fix them.
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I0fdd8bdf11b497ffeed37c37953c5730f6e4f3b7
Previously, parser would output offsets that don't exist in their
containers, because we were pretending that entities are parts of
their neighboring text nodes.
Turns out it's much easier to do it right when going backwards.
Change-Id: I9bccca2d403f1a976ae517449989170cdd99721e
Follow-up to ccd9e411d2.
* Fix variable name in CommentTestCase::overwriteHtmlFile()
* Overwrite before assertions, because they abort execution if they fail
Change-Id: I5bba016ba93f9dd1994325ae82c3105ba11cf033
Something terrible has happened to this function… It seems that I have
brutalized it when rebasing 092cfd6075.
Change-Id: I12d75c69d15645112563a7bc345209b23b54cb3e
Only 'baserevid' should be required. That's what we used before commit
8829a1a412, since switching from
'basetimestamp' in commit 4e135c7f07 in
order to better handle edit conflicts with yourself. That fix seems to
have regressed, so let's try this and see if it helps.
Bug: T252558
Change-Id: Iff5911384f3320b6e7f97a1fa34e82ecd4b44fb3
In commit 8829a1a412 we kept this code
when adding the reply API, but on second thought it doesn't actually
make sense.
The reply API should never fail with an edit conflict normally, since
it makes the edit on the latest version of the page. If it does fail,
I think it's better to just show the error message. Current behavior
is to retry, and if that doesn't actually solve the problem, this ends
up in an infinite loop.
Bug: T252558
Change-Id: I5e0dcb2c42e5de4f18e99b8a761ca048a430b31e
