This includes the dtrepliedto URL functionality from
I3f81e4d77faed367606e47678b8896051982359d.
Bug: T274831
Bug: T274832
Bug: T277329
Change-Id: I035d04f30c8312b0cb42902d3bf940df1482ffb3
Use `DOMCompat::getBody( ... )` as a nicer getter than
`->getElementsByTagName( 'body' )->item( 0 )`.
Remove overly defensive checks and redundant annotations on its
return value. Since we're dealing with HTML documents throughout,
the document body is guaranteed to exist.
We previously needed some of them to convince Phan when it thought
the body may be null, but this seems to no longer be needed.
Change-Id: If7aee7b6adbfa78269c7ba28b26a6eaa21fe935b
Use DOMCompat::querySelectorAll() instead.
CommentModifier::isHtmlSigned()
* Copied the CSS selector from the JS equivalent function.
CommentUtils::unwrapParsoidSections()
* Copied the CSS selector from the JS equivalent function (in VisualEditor).
CommentItem::getMentions()
* Trivial.
This causes Phan to report some more issues, which are also fixed.
Follow-up to 25272e7a4a.
Change-Id: Iaf1222f7114916f2eca19942c3686168899486fd
We can just use insertBefore() normally. There was never a PHP bug,
but rather a Phan bug, and it no longer affects us.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools/+/596813/70/includes/ImmutableRange.php#373
This reveals a bug in CommentParser where it sometimes produces
incorrect ranges (we were incorrectly treating `false` like `null`,
hiding the issue). I'll fix it in a separate commit.
Follow-up to 25272e7a4a.
Change-Id: I4afba38f1d82ddbf8732bfe3e4d4f6ebe2f8de5d
In case 4 and case 6, no notifications are expected. In all other
cases we now get the expected notifications.
Bug: T285528
Change-Id: I9e813bb3a053bc1232783f9eae1ad75672b4fa7e
These changes ensure that DiscussionTools is independent of DOM
library choice, and will not break if/when Parsoid switches to an
alternate (more standards-compliant) DOM library.
We run `phan` against the Dodo standards-compliant DOM library,
so this ends up flagging uses of non-standard PHP extensions to
the DOM. These will be suppressed for now with a "Nonstandard DOM"
comment that can be grepped for, since they will eventually
will need to be rewritten or worked around.
Most frequent issues:
* Node::nodeValue and Node::textContent and Element::getAttribute()
can return null in a spec-compliant implementation. Add `?? ''` to
make spec-compliant results consistent w/ what PHP returns.
* DOMXPath doesn't accept anything except DOMDocument. These uses
should be replaced with DOMCompat::querySelectorAll() or similar
(which end up using DOMXPath under the covers for DOMDocument any way,
but are implemented more efficiently in a spec-compliant
implementation).
* A couple of times we have code like:
`while ($node->firstChild!==null) { $node = $node->firstChild; }`
and phan's analysis isn't strong enough to determine that $node is still
non-null after the while. This same issue should appear with DOMDocument
but phan doesn't complain for some reason.
One apparently legit issue:
* Node::insertBefore() is once called in a funny way which leans on
the fact that the second option is optional in PHP. This seems to be
a workaround for an ancient PHP bug, and can probably be safely
removed.
Bug: T287611
Bug: T217867
Change-Id: I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3
For compatibility with Parsoid's document abstraction (Parsoid may
switch to an alternate DOM library in the future), don't explicitly
create a new document object using `new DOMDocument`; instead use
the Parsoid wrapper `DOMCompat::newDocument()`. This ensures that
the Document object created will be compatible with Parsoid.
There are a number of other subtle dependencies on the PHP `dom`
extension in DiscussionTools, like explicit `instanceof` tests; those
will be tweaked in a follow-up patch
(I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3) since they do not affect
correctness so long as Parsoid is aliasing Document to a subclass of
the built-in DOMDocument. Similarly, the Phan warnings we suppress
do not cause runtime errors (because of the fixes included in
c5265341afd9efde6b54ba56dc009aab88eff83c) but phan will be happier
once the follow-up patch lands and aligns all the DOM types.
Bug: T287611
Depends-On: If0671255779571a91d3472a9d90d0f2d69dd1f7d
Change-Id: Ib98bd5b76de7a0d32a29840d1ce04379c72ef486
The user interface only allows you to subscribe to level 2 headings.
But we would generate events for whatever heading was the closest,
If it was e.g. level 3, no one would receive that notification.
Now we generate events for the closest level 2 heading, or we don't
generate the event at all if there isn't one (if the only headings are
of level 3 and below, or level 1, or if the comment is added before
the first heading on the page).
Bug: T286736
Change-Id: Iae99853070e353ab81c9cc29ef1d53c877adfc66
We used an internal API requests to fetch page content because it was
easy, but there's no way to guarantee that it returns data from the
primary database.
Use ParserOutputAccess::getParserOutput() to fetch from cache if
available. Also, use canonical output instead of user-specific,
not that it should matter.
Bug: T285895
Change-Id: I7dcd9659be77746dc2a0c4eeae2319887936b555
…without making the topic subscriptions feature available in user preferences.
Follow-up to these commits, which added these checks in ad-hoc ways:
* 9420f22e9d
* f3422f40a6
* 23a490deca
* a555db7892
Bug: T284491
Change-Id: If2e3fb1e06d1cc489fbca14796ed77c83bb52991
If the revision from which we generated the notification has been
deleted, we shouldn't include the content snippet, nor the direct link
to the comment (because the fragment ID is generated from the content).
This matches how Echo handles mention notifications.
Change-Id: Ica939f3a4efd39d0c295511d58280d3f9d584129
As it happens, most of Echo does not actually parse this message,
but it is for some reason parsed in HTML email notifications.
Change-Id: I414cd242d9bcc4d8b5a1c2a2a71be9e5f00ea8be
We don't display [subscribe] buttons on your user talk page,
but the API still allows those subscriptions.
Use the same approach as for mentions to ensure this doesn't cause
duplicate notifications.
Remove some code in SubscribedNewCommentPresentationModel,
now guaranteed to be unused.
Change-Id: I99a276a48d8562552ed2c54cc0323e8e428845fd
Otherwise, the global context is used (RequestContext::getMain()),
which is undesirable when you're building a rubegoldbergian
contraption and we're already inside an internal action API request
with a fake context.
Change-Id: I01daf8dc70b5751bc1e157fe598988cd5d3219e5
Per Manuel Arostegui in T263817#7033384. The limit is 5000.
(I picked it arbitrarily, there's no real rationale for it.)
Also log a warning when any user reaches half of the limit,
so that we might make a decision about changing this mechanism
before it starts affecting users. Maybe at that time we'll
have data to show that it's safe to remove the limit.
Bug: T263817
Change-Id: I18a8ee0ad7383759229c5721d5253fb591457d4d
Using `updateCacheExpiry()` in this way appears to be established
with examples of other use in WMF production such as:
- CategortyTree extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<categorytree>`.
- RSS extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<rss>`.
- intersection extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<DynamicPageList>`.
- Math extension:
custom cache expiry if `<math>` failed.
- Wikibase extension, Flow extension:
no caching for certain namespaces or content types.
- Graph extension, Kartographer extension:
via onParserAfterParse hook, no caching if on preview.
Bug: T280605
Change-Id: Iea41ab8599ffae4622c97d682258b1b64eaf9ba2
