* Ignore rendering-transparent nodes between discussion comments.
* Improve isRenderingTransparentNode() so that <link> nodes
representing TemplateStyles are not considered transparent,
otherwise this would undo ae920b831f.
Using a regexp from Parsoid.
Bug: T272746
Change-Id: I0b3c3251156ba6c4826abf5ba44ea93f80ebc01d
Add yet another tree walking utility: CommentUtils::linearWalk().
Unlike TreeWalker, it allows handling the beginnings and ends of nodes
separately – kind of like parsing a XML token stream, or kind of like
VisualEditor's linear model.
(Add unit tests for this utility. The simple.html test case is copied
from [VisualEditor/VisualEditor]/demos/ve/pages/simple.html.)
Use this utility to stop skipping when we reach either a closing or
opening block node tag. Previously we'd skip over such tags inside
nested "transparent" nodes (like <a>, <del>, or apparently <font>).
Bug: T271385
Change-Id: I201a942eb3a56335e84d94e150ec2c33f8b4f4e0
As a result of 0fc71f60cd, "empty" text
nodes (containing only whitespace) at the end of the comment may be
inside the comment's range, and trying to ignore them caused the
ranges not to match and the frame not to be detected.
Now the code works whether they're inside the comment's range or not.
Add a test case for wrapped discussion comments with HTML comments and
with whitespace.
Bug: T250126
Bug: T268407
Change-Id: I2217ff5a635fd1c9c9e803f46795b1bfb3d17535
While working on T270009, I noticed that <style> and <link> nodes
are treated differently, which seemed weird. Rewrite this again,
hopefully this is the last time.
The changed test cases also involve <area> and <input> nodes,
and the new results make more sense to me.
Bug: T264116
Change-Id: I3af90c84768a4b3dc53446927f4dba6f72175a2f
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
Instead of doing a separate tree walk and finding all timestamps
separately, make it part of the getComments tree walk, and find
timestamps one at a time.
Change-Id: I47f466eaf228504faa189fd99e07493bc7f022cd
* Move modifier#getFullyCoveredWrapper to utils
* Use that method to find the node where we start searching for
template wrappers, rather than using endContainer
Bug: T252058
Change-Id: I55de58102f3468fce01290bd413a7fdc96d322d6
I was wondering if the different approach to childIndexOf()
implemented in PHP in b8d7a75c34 would
be faster in JS as well, and yes, it is.
Our test suite now takes (on my machine):
* Chrome: 8337 ms → 7355 ms (average over 5 tries)
* Firefox: 5321 ms → 5044 ms (average over 5 tries)
Change-Id: I71963eeb92dcea9bfd59cbf01a7aa0b7de5d9cf1
