Why:
- The button should only display for Minerva
What:
- Consult the skin name before adding the "Edit" button to the menu
Bug: T342251
Change-Id: I52cf2ca0663a4de0ee7add82910e745bcabf1c5f
'editable' refers to the section being editable, and is only for
use by heading items, not individual comments.
Change-Id: I3fb5841609c40a928071cea8987cf035ade464c2
Since 92f5cfd8 we support "mw-notalk" to suppressing comment detection
in pages or sections.
Until now, it only worked when the comment timestamp was surrounded by
a marked element. However, when a marked element was directly adjacent
to a comment, it would sometimes become a part of the comment range.
This can no longer happen now.
Existing use cases for this were the {{outdent}} and {{tracked}}
templates, which we handle specially since 50ad5bb2 and ddd391b6.
It's a bit ugly to hardcode specific templates like that, and this
provides a better solution for the future. The added test case
displays some other potential uses.
Bug: T324132
Change-Id: I7ffd299ef5957b35da8d01f9a0ed5a7a9a78be83
Only needed for phan, under php8.1 this internal
function is deprecated about null.
The property $subscriptionName is not null when $subscriptionTitle is
not null and current code is safe, but phan cannot see the dependency
between both properties
Change-Id: I9e67309ec25a70c5de91d7f3e8f18447f205a4e4
Why:
- We want to provide contextual actions adjacent to comments, not just
topic headings.
What:
- Consolidate the logic for embedding the overflow menu button HTML into
a function, and add this for both topic and comment items.
- For this patch, this is done only for mobile; in a follow-up patch, we
can add support for desktop
- This doesn't use a feature flag as 1) no one is implementing the
DiscussionTools hook yet, 2) the 'edit' menu item is disabled at the
comment level. Merging this change would be a no-op until an extension
implements the DiscussionToolsAddOverflowMenuItemsHook.
Bug: T342251
Change-Id: I15a151f151e2fa04398876b559d93d45c42f6ef6
Why:
- We want to allow extensions to register interactive menu items in the
overflow menu.
What:
- Create a PHP hook to allow extensions to provide menu items
for rendering in the overflow menu
- The hook allows for registering resource loader modules required by
the menu item
- The hook passes in some contextual information, like the thread
item data, context source object, and if the page is editable
- Create a JS hook that fires when a user selects one of the menu items
- Example implementation: Ie9afbedb4f24cbd75eb48bb21dc9f6d8d732d853
Misc:
- Remove b/c code that existed to handle a transitional period where
JSON encoded overflow menu data did not necessarily exist in the
parser cache
- Rename code instances of ellipsis button / data / menu to refer to
"overflow menu"
- Some renames will have to wait until parser cache is updated; these
are noted with TODOs
Bug: T342251
Change-Id: I5f2a51791f8ba7619d1399a4b93111e9bb44e172
In T339882 we thought that these rows are harmless, but for the
specific case of itr_items_id that's not true.
Bug: T343859
Change-Id: Iebfa583d7d4b00a59291f91ec84c41241d5469d4
For some reason this apostrophe is treated like the start of a string
by Gerrit's syntax highlighting, messing up the whole file. It annoys
me very much.
Change-Id: Ie1ce88eefda6ae2a8a73237556affba4cbc6db4b
This approach is borrowed from PageQueryPage in MediaWiki core,
and used in a few other places as well.
Bug: T345648
Change-Id: I7fbc3c3c1133da78eb9f15de9b2a51a90bcd1980
Check whether the page given to DiscussionToolsDebug exists or not.
Without the check, it throws Wikimedia\Assert\PreconditionException.
Add 'exists' => true in the getFormFields() array.
Bug: T338480
Change-Id: I57222f60cb5c5645e6bc97b86be22c502c85d650
When rendering a preview of the comment in order to check whether it's
signed, use the previously acquired temporary user username for the
signature.
Depends-On: Iec8a15dadd595bed0f7e54f907fbb8e192b45cf3
Bug: T331397
Change-Id: I7aeb1cc4c107ed752dc805405780a7609a6d4d3c
What:
Growth wants to use ApiDiscussionToolsEdit to
post questions on behalf of new users (to make use
of the auto-subscribing logic DiscussionTools has).
This seems like a good moment to make the API
non-internal.
What:
* Add support for 'tags' parameter
(this doesn't actually work w/o the depends-on)
* Add autosubscribe parameter to give more control
to callers over whether autosubscription is used.
* Remove isInternal()
Bug: T343339
Bug: T333632
Depends-On: I0ac60ca8473fe28461b2da60f9911baac4994388
Change-Id: I39727de40557d2494f4d60bf224490caaedfdee1
Parsoid can be expected to throw limit exceeded exceptions so a more
graceful response should be provided.
Bug: T325298
Change-Id: I6bedc7639a68311d5247331d5e53f88c004ebc5e
