The ext.cite.referencePreviews module will transparently replace the
ext.popups.referencePreviews module after this patch. Configuration
stays in Popups for now, we can migrate it in later work.
CSS classes may be renamed in the future but this will be handled
separately since it could be a breaking change for on-wiki
customizations.
A lot of fancy footwork happens in this patch to emulate a soft
dependency on Popups. This mechanism doesn't exist explicitly in
either ResourceLoader or QUnit, so lots of workarounds are used, to
conditionally load the module and to dynamically skip dependent tests.
renderer.test.js is fully skipped for now, but can be wired up in
later work.
Bug: T355194
Change-Id: I0dc47abb59a40d4e41e7dda0eb7b415a2e1ae508
This CSS exists since I2ab47e7 from August 2014. The original idea
was to dim the default "General references" when you edit a <ref> or
<references> list in VisualEditor.
Steps to reproduce:
* Start VisualEditor.
* Edit a <ref> or <references> list.
* Edit the group.
* You will see the dimmed text "General references". This is not the
CSS in this patch, but the default styling for OOUI placeholders.
* Open the dropdown. The list will show a "General references" item.
It's not dimmed. This is where the CSS was meant to be.
The CSS class name in the OOUI mixin was actually changed from
"oo-ui-flaggableElement-…" to "oo-ui-flaggedElement-…" via I1abecd8,
just a few days later.
In addition the selector wouldn't work anyway for other reasons.
The dropdown is not inside the `.ve-ui-mwReferenceGroupInputWidget`
container any more but placed outside by the OOUI window manager.
And the selector's specifity is to low, at least since Ic57b3ff.
I argue it's not worth fixing it. Nobody missed it for 10 years.
Light gray text would be illegible anyway on the light gray/light
blue backgrounds used in the dropdown menu. Let's consider it dead
code and just remove it.
The class name doesn't appear anywhere else (any more):
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=flaggableElement
Change-Id: Ia802303737ba35cd4b14fae924b7227472f905fd
This can be quite confusing:
* A node does have attributes. One of the attributes is called
"refGroup", another one "mw".
* mw contains a JSON structure with just a few elements, most
notably a "body" and an "attrs" element. These reflect what was
originally written in the wikitext.
* mw.attrs reflects the original properties a.k.a. attributes from
the <ref …> or <references …> tag.
Deleting mw.refGroup doesn't do anything because the attribute is
called <ref group="…"> in the wikitext, not <ref refGroup="…">.
You can actually see this bug in action on all wikis: Go to a page
that uses references in non-standard groups, e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historic_Cherokee_settlements
Start VisualEditor. Find e.g. the [notes 1] reference. Edit it
and change the group from "notes" to "General references". Click
"Publish…" and "Review" your changes. The visual diff works because
it apparently uses other information. The wikitext diff is empty.
This is also what's saved: nothing. The edit is lost.
Bug: T359943
Change-Id: I798605d2fd60a6b8f317ec85a4e4d08fd245e084
* Include the README in generated JS docs.
* Tweak stray top-level files to explain their role. Note that the
wmf template forces these files to appear on the docs home page...
Bug: T358641
Change-Id: If421414340903991f50a06a76551bd7cd2904c5e
The first two files have been added to the root modules/ directory
via I487095d in 2015. No problem.
Many, many more files have been added via I000b453 in 2022. It's
really hard to tell what is what since then.
I'm not absolutely sure what the naming convention for this folder
should be. Could as well be "localized-styles/" or just "Parsoid/".
Bug: T156350
Change-Id: Ibcf8c7a6db5400ed8a9811244a070e03ff372a39
This didn't mean what it looked like: `||` has higher priority, so an
undefined elem would not result in an empty string.
Change-Id: I1e361842f060815b04802a1ab8f077faa1a8bc6b
Some of the annotations were used in a way that confused jsdoc. This
cleans up redundant annotations and uses more canonical tags.
These changes cause all classes to now appear in the generated pages.
Includes linking to external docs.
Bug: T358641
Change-Id: Iaee1dadcc19a70c27839d0d27dfa6a07a70fb46b
These tags are 10 years old. Current documentation generators don't
need them.
Tagging something explicitely as being a @method can be useful in
an interface where the elements are initialized with e.g. `= null;`
instead of having an implementation. But we have implementations
here. Sure these are methods. No need to say that in the
documentation.
Also removing a comment that's obviously a copy-paste mistake from
what was the ve.ui.MWMediaSearchWidget back then. See Ib244ff6 and
before.
Change-Id: I7df6c789d10fd89e7fe97d56c942fd22c56d8458
This reverts commit 0566a495f3.
Reason for revert: Merged too soon, while discussion of the whole
approach is still ongoing.
Change-Id: I2d3d6455cd4ea12067e2020f6b41cfbb4672bbb5
It's fine to copy attributes directly from the reference node rather
than go through the specialized model object.
Bug: T336417
Change-Id: Idaca192137dc762ddced2ee8446a7d838f97e317
Begin a QUnit test module for the reference model. Tests demonstrate
that a new ref and a normal ref reuse from the full document both
behave as expected.
Bug: T336417
Change-Id: I1337806d41b50329ba971c8e68e1a62b52cc9a52
Intentionally no other change is made (yet). This is for a later,
separate patch.
Intentionally not touching the huge list of per-language
ext.cite.style.*.css files for the moment. Again, I would prefer to
do this in a separate patch.
Change-Id: I4e392c7bd1c69849a6c7946676a64c749ddbcd60
The current tracking is wrong for several reasons. Mainly because
of a race condition if the Popups extension fininshed loading
before the Cite tracking script is executed. But further more
wgPopupsReferencePreviews was not a good choice to see if the user
sees previews or not.
The logging now uses the monoschema and only checks for enabled
previews when the click events are fired. The chances that Popups
finished initilizing then are much higher then. We still can see
if the init is not finished and the variable not set though.
Also we won't track the overall pageviews in here but use the
generic pageview_hourly from the data lake instead.
Bug: T353798
Depends-On: I1c434f0098ae23bd62256686a658e3d5ef7f70b9
Change-Id: I7a9524274efb58286f520c6148d5463bb0a78dbf
Same as Icfa8215 where we removed the …_suffix messages.
This patch is not blocked on anything according to CodeSearch:
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=cite_references%3F_link_prefix
According to GlobalSearch there are 2 usages we need to talk about:
https://global-search.toolforge.org/?q=.®ex=1&namespaces=8&title=Cite.references%3F.link.prefix.*
zh.wiktionary replaces "cite_ref-" with "_ref-", and "cite_note-"
with "_note-", i.e. they did nothing but remove the word "cite". This
happened in 2006, with no explanation.
ka.wikibooks and ka.wikiquote replace "cite_note-" with "_შენიშვნა-",
which translates back to "_note-". One user did this in 2007,
16 seconds apart.
It appears like both are attempts to localize what can be localized,
no matter if it's really necessary or not.
https://zh.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Shibo77?offset=20060510https://ka.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Trulala?offset=20070219
Note how one user experimented with an "a" in some of the edits to
see what effect the change might have, to imediatelly revert it.
The modifications don't really have an effect on anything, except on
the anchors in the resulting <a href="#_ref-5"> and <sup id="_ref-5">
HTML. It might also be briefly visible in the browser's address bar
when such a link is clicked. We can only assume the two users did this
to make the URL appear shorter (?). A discussion apparently never
happened. Bot users are inactive.
Both pieces of HTML are generated in the Cite code. Removing the
messages will change all places the same time. All links will
continue to work. The only possible effect is that hard-coded
weblinks to an individual reference will link to the top of the
article instead. But:
a) This is extremely unlikely to happen. There is no reason to link
to a reference from outside of the article.
b) Such links are not guaranteed to work anyway as they can break
for a multitude of other reasons, e.g. the <ref> being renamed,
removed, or replaced.
c) Even if such a link breaks, it still links to the correct article.
There is also no on-wiki code on zh.wiktionary that would do anything
with the shortened prefix:
https://zh.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%2F_%28ref%7Cnote%29-%2F&title=Special%3A%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns2=1&ns4=1&ns8=1&ns10=1&ns12=1&ns828=1&ns2300=1
I argue this is safe to remove, even without contacting the mentioned
communities first.
Bug: T321217
Change-Id: I160a119710dc35679dbdc2f39ddf453dbd5a5dfa
WikiEditor also uses 'html' instead of 'text' on headings. At the
moment both keys have the same behavior, but the original intended idea
is to have 'html' as already valid HTML (like on .parse()) and 'text'
on plain text which has to be escaped.
Change-Id: I1b4035a86ed56bfeb12d33b463d67099f7ae40e3
In this JavaScript files the closure is not needed to prevent
declarations of functions and variables in the global scope.
Change-Id: I169a74c69a5e00b86fbcc9f56886a3c4157ebd0f
In articles with references, a reference list is generated. If you
try to visual edit the reference list, it displays a message "This
reference list is generated by a template, and for now can only be
edited in source mode." However it is actually editable now that
T54750 (Community Wishlist 2023 wish #2) is complete.
Bug: T54750
Change-Id: Id8115ae6045f371e4619c85aeb610fe78927d802
