There is currently no strict CodeSniffer rule for this. I think we
need to have one sooner or later. Anyway, what I find important is to
have a consistent code style in one codebase.
I refused to do this change previously because I don't like to mess
with Git blame if it's not really necessary. However, at this point all
code was moved around anyway.
I ended removing a comment that appears misplaced now, and doesn't help
maiing the code more readable. I like not having a dot at the end if
it's not really a sentence.
Change-Id: Id1d4f43277c69080c512c1a5ceff4c948bfa05be
In the end I don't care much if we agree on having this newline, or
not. What I care about more is that this codebase is consistent.
Personally I prefer having the newline. It creates a visible separation
between what "goes in" and what "goes out" (@throws and @return).
Change-Id: Ibc60af621132e415a5579397c01688fa21eb0be5
The rollback feature was not able to properly restore a __placeholder__.
That's why a specific use case was behaving different. This already
worked just fine:
<ref extends="a">…</ref>
<references>
<ref name="a">…</ref>
</references>
But this didn't, even if it is the exact same from the users
perspective:
<ref extends="a">…</ref>
{{#tag:references|
<ref name="a">…</ref>
}}
Bug: T239810
Change-Id: I163a1bffb9450a9e7f776e32e66fb08d0452cdb9
Note this leaves *another* bug behind. When a <ref> is properly reused
by name="…", and the content is fine (either missing or identical),
possibly conflicting extends="…" attributes are currently entirely
ignored. However, this is already much better than what happened before.
Bug: T242110
Change-Id: Id808ce31c8036cc290f68bb3e8c5a7b12f4f44cf
This should now roughly resemble 2nd level indentation for nested
list elements. CSS Janus should take care of RTL compatibily.
Bug: T239329
Change-Id: I2eb5b63033f558555b1d79faba82b5a774ddd934
This is an extremely relevant use case, but we never had a test for
this:
Some text.<ref extends="book">Page 2</ref>
<references>
<ref name="book">Title of the book</ref>
</references>
What this means: There is no reference in the text that points to the
book as a whole, only references that point to individual pages. The
base <ref> is not used in the text.
This is already properly rendered. There is no "jump back to the text"
link. However, this fails when <references> is wrapped in {{#tag:…}}.
Bug: T239810
Change-Id: Id22db0238266a4fd6131d1a10eb6bf6227552c19
The rollbackRefs function no longer needs to "know" details about
how to turn a refCallStack item into a redo item. This is better a
responsibility of the subroutine, where the items are unpacked.
Change-Id: I1e2ff77cb5e66d70e451ee09e641ff752c770ab4
As a result, the references are now treated like any other
template-generated reference, e.g. they can't be edited.
Previously they could be edited as if they weren't template-generated,
causing trouble. Editing them had no effect (changes would not be
saved), and copy-pasting them into another page resulted in
"substituted" content (template metadata was lost).
Bug: T209493
Change-Id: I4e75ccd57cd752a726653c725d8c29a09306e83b
I tried to run these tests with a very old version of this code base
(from 2018) to confirm this is the correct behavior.
Bug: T241303
Change-Id: Id97d016b199458aa178ca732282e9c0e91e291a4
The logic was changed in 51ff3cc819.
Only `responsive="0"` is supposed to disable responsive references,
any other value should enable it.
Bug: T241303
Change-Id: I8c99bf93c739d6dba348785b1b6452cfce2c57c9
One of the most significant changes is when I noticed that the $group
can never be null. We set it to DEFAULT_GROUP before. That's an empty
string.
I'm not very happy with the two @phan-suppress-next-line. Is there a
better way to fix these lines?
Change-Id: I33c1681e2f3857cb6701da71f4ed8893caff4d1e
These should be impossible conditions, we don't want to continue with
processing.
I hate this patch, it's a temporary workaround until someone rewrites
or replaces the rollback logic, for example with a two-pass parse.
Change-Id: I6a1327e397d4272fa412c3f290c2107d867d2854
In historical versions of the Cite extension, unclosed <ref> tags were
sometimes caught and rendered as another, unrelated validation error.
This is no longer the case thanks to a more accurate check for
unclosed <ref> tags.
Remove user-facing text explaining the edge condition.
Change-Id: Ic27e120213e39e3774ad7c8ee76eabd2faa74234
We print error messages in red, bold, large text so that they stand
out from content. "<code>" spans, which are prevalent in our messages,
were styled with black text by accident, this patch turns them red.
This should cause less annoyance on readers.
Change-Id: Ic911552909ecc5ace4be927cad5b835e1006355e
I hope this patch is not to horrifying and can be reviewed. It's
possible to split this into a sequence of smaller patches. Please
tell me.
Change-Id: I4797fcd5612fcffb0df6c29ff575dd05f278bd4d
