This parser test is a bit obscure, in my opinion. We added it in
I8c4de96 to make sure we don't get thousand separators in most
places.
We continued reworking the code since then. By now it's effectively
impossible to "accidentally" get thousand separators. The
problematic methods from the Language class are not even accessible
any more from this code.
To make the tests more robust we now use createNoOpMock (done via
the previous patch) where it matters, specifically for all Language
and Parser mocks. This proves the problematic Language methods are
never called.
Bug: T253743
Bug: T238187
Change-Id: I9bfe1f4decfaf699996da63e19473c2c0d581d9d
Both Language and Parser are extremely complex classes with hundreds
of public methods. We really want to make sure we are not depending
on anything unexpected from these classes. If calls are made into
these classes we want to know exactly what is called.
Doing this also showed that some mocked methods are not even needed.
Change-Id: Icdfff6c07be78a47bf7cadb1813a72581a51272a
This reverts commit 41c4fcf41e.
Reason for revert: Something is/was broken here. This doesn't make
sense. The message still exists in en.json.
Change-Id: Ia018cc8b1d96a1b26905532e15d69f8ec07ca375
This reverts a very tiny part of Ib3fdc89 from 2 weeks ago. The
reasons are explained in Ib3fdc89. Short version:
* The ->parse() calls have drastic performance implications.
* Allowing wikitext and HTML in this message also makes T321217
worse.
The new message "cite_reference_backlink_symbol" is kept and still
used in the UI. Just not in these two messages any more. This is a
minor redundancy we want to get rid of at some point. But it's not
critical for the moment. This will be done as part of T321217.
Nothing will break on the wikis. Some wikis have customizations for
"cite_references_link_one" and "cite_references_link_many" in place.
This will continue to work as before Ib3fdc89.
Bug: T339973
Change-Id: I933771e3ad67cd530bcf5ee8469cef35ea1070d2
This is a mistake that exists in this codebase for who knows how
long.
Cite mis-uses the messaging system a lot for internal things we still
want to customize somehow, but are not labels that will ever be shown
on the screen. The prefix/suffix messages in this patch are meant to be
part of the HTML in id="…" attributes. Prefix/suffix must be a static
plain text strings. Using e.g. {{GENDER}} or {{PLURAL}} in these
messages is not even possible because there is no $1 parameter to use.
Note how all other similar messages already use ->plain().
A few wikis override these messages, but stick to the plain-text
convention, as they should:
https://global-search.toolforge.org/?q=.®ex=1&namespaces=8&title=Cite.*reference.*fix
This will continue to work.
This has minor performance implications. Fetching these messages is
faster if we can skip transformations.
Bug: T321217
Change-Id: I7969c255fe4ce897e904897081da5f52678721aa
ext.cite.style.css is very close to ext.cite.styles.css and is
often confusing.
In about 3 weeks (the current PC expiry time), we should be able to
get rid of the ext.cite.style module from extension.json after
removing all references to it from other repos and caches.
I don't see a reason to rename all the other language specific
CSS files since there is no room for being confused there.
Change-Id: I3a41f435b0cbe51f8c9a6dde8a9f6eb13a9879f7
* Be more specific about the type of context which a
context item belongs to.
* Make grammar clearer.
Change-Id: I9bcc129766c3386582def0f346d6f175e54d6ff6
Some of the methods used for mw.message were incorrect, which could
potentially lead to double escaping.
This follows up I4bc60570012bcd8eab5ad32c5004d06b3af42798
Change-Id: Iceb819c8fa6c46c234fc79d1c81bd3252440269c
