This patch is mostly moving code around without changing the behavior.
Exceptions:
* The ErrorReporter creates a <span> container. This was previously
parsed. The only benefit might be error checking and escaping. Rather
pointless. The code just created this HTML. With this patch, it is not
parsed any more. The unit test reflects this change. The output in
production will not change, as the parser tests show.
* Parsing of the message key (to detect it's type and id) is simplified
a lot, using explode. With this the code can, in theory, support more
types.
Bug: T239572
Change-Id: If2fe5f55db46dfc7e0ce445348608bef00bec64e
Perform the validation in validateRef, and display a new error message for
broken "follow" refs. This changes existing behavior, where broken folow
ref content is arbitrarily displayed at the top of the references list and
no error is rendered.
Thanks to weasely wording, the new error can later be reused for "extends"
errors.
Bug: T240858
Change-Id: I506e4dcd1151671f5302ecd99581145d979d8124
This exception was introduced very late in the patch I38c9929. It
already caused trouble. This here is essentially a revert. It restores
the previous behavior where this edge-case was silently ignored. The
worst thing that can happen is that appendText() creates an incomplete
entry in the $this->refs array, which will be rendered at the end. The
user can see it then.
As of now we are not aware of a code path where this would even be
possible. Still this does make the code *more* robust by not making it
explode, but give the user something they can work with.
Bug: T243221
Change-Id: I2e2d29bbd557090981903fcc2ece8796fafa4aa4
These create bogus output, depending on the surrounding wikitext the
<ref> tag is used in. For example, this example wikitext:
* Example.<ref name="1">a</ref> More text.
… will be rendered with the "More text" sentence wrapped on the next
line, outside of the list. However, this does *not* happen in many of
the localizations, e.g. German, because many Tanslatewiki translators
did not copied the bogus \n. Why should they.
TL;DR: These newline characters either do nothing, or destroy the output.
In both cases the proper fix is to replace them with spaces.
Some of the test cases touched in this patch demonstrate the issue.
Change-Id: I395a40637a5293eda1f477963d252ce1a215f8b2
This resolves another TODO. Since this is an intentional limitation in
the design of the feature, I find it pretty signigicant to give it it's
own error message.
Note that the text does not need to be perfect, just good enough for now.
We will review all error messages later via T238188.
Bug: T242141
Change-Id: Id9c863061e855350320131e81f6702c8810736f4
… if possible. In most cases it's possible to use the real object, and
reach into it's private parts via TestingAccessWrapper. This is almost
the same as using a mock, but I feel it's much more "light-weight".
The main change is that there is no strict assertion any more for the
number of ReferenceStack::pushInvalidRef() calls. Before this was mixed
into the same array as the valid references, as elements set to "false".
I think the test is as valueable as before without this extra check. If
the rollback stack works or not is already covered by other tests.
Change-Id: I90213557b164b3e43233a3dc393ee3f3d3d556a9
"Conflicting" here includes the case where one of two <ref> with the
same name does not have an extends attribute. The first occurence of
a name specifies if a <ref> is a top-level or a sub-reference. This can
not be changed later.
This patch changes multiple existing test cases. I checked all of them
in detail and confirmed the behavior is fine. The error reporting is
better or at least equally good in all cases.
Bug: T242141
Change-Id: Iaec306eefe5b168d496990105e297ca044a5e721
Allow a ref with `name=""` for backwards-compatibility.
Partially reverts I07738cce2641026dfaa92ba263ed6f9834be0944
Bug: T242437
Change-Id: Iaed2d1c41be377a4961aff39838b0965f6c00616
The goal of this patch is to not change any behavior, just make the
code less nested and less complicated.
Change-Id: I89170960ffbf61f57e245adf097f3e8d8196bbce
The difference between the two is that isOK() only reports "fatals",
while isGood() also reports "warnings" and "errors". I believe we
*want* to report all of these the same way.
Change-Id: I3be832c5db7aba3c03bd2ad8cfbba42362c093fd
