The method for old_links retrieval depends on the "forFilter"
value, which we know in advance. If it's true, old_links should
be retrieved from the database. Make a case in the switch
that does nothing but retrieves links from the database,
and direct the evaluation to it.
This change was split from I3628a56e5 to make its review easier.
NOTE: this changes code potentially executed on every save operation.
Change-Id: I33b688f6be3c58beec403f7bf26407a42e7c18ab
Regarding array building: Instead of adding to array with
$array[] = 'foo' and then doing array_flip(), simply do
$array['foo'] = true;
Regarding tests: I originally wanted to create a unit test but I ended
up mocking so many things that it wasn't worth it and the config variable
is globaly which first we need to clean up after deployment is done.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: Iac8dca7078668ee3441d19b6aafe499c1aa0d732
This is a direct follow up for I6373fa6 where we apparently fixed
half of the cases while breaking the other half. There was actualy
a code path that can return null, and anther one that can return a
status object.
Since there is never anything done with the status object we can as
well get rid of it and always return null in case of an error.
Bug: T337431
Bug: T279275
Change-Id: I2ccb58756182897bcd6649c9f589e2f7a0321b20
We will have a pretty large list of blocked domains that we need to
swift through in each edit for any added domain. In order to cacth
subdomains being added, we have to do all sorts of complicated
operations and string search in large set of strings which is quite
slow. To fix that, let's simply pretend a user who has added
foo.bar.com, also added bar.com and com and do exact match in array of
strings making it much faster.
h/t Krinkle for the idea
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I96795ed7d1a25f051db0b591dde21b032b138ded
For now, we will revisit this in the future. Specially if the
communities think otherwise.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I2847264eba9a3cc4fc47a22eacb523199015f9e7
This makes raw page editing safer, and potentially enables opening up
access to less restricted user groups.
Bug: T337431
Change-Id: I14f21003a551f34b6e524e9b229613e79b0e5a70
Treat temporary users the same as IP users. Neither has user groups,
so return early for both.
Bug: T335062
Change-Id: I20b48608cf6ba5f8e8e36a378d66c603d84b032f
It is behind a feature flag. Improvements on it can happen in follow
ups. The patch is already quite massive.
Bug: T337431
Bug: T279275
Change-Id: I3df949c4d41ce65bb4afa013da9c691ac05fc760
Temporary users get the same block expiry as anonymous (IP) users,
since d42b7335d5.
Update the checkbox label to reflect this.
Change-Id: Ibf60936d9c746d857fc4354552d71e1efdd52066
* Set the same block expiry for temp and anon users
* Don't block autopromote for temp users; they can't be autopromoted
* Bail early from CheckUserHandler if the user is temporary
Bug: T335062
Change-Id: I6b72537f568c4c70a0b86f1825ea30b767f5634a
