This does the same as before, replacing \r\n as well as \r with \n.
Additionally the new method applies an rtrim() on both strings. I
believe this is even a good thing. It possibly removes irrelevant
noise from the diff.
Change-Id: I584740a24e6b25bbcbc928c2369f09b785a485c8
On second thought, no need to keep the migration script now, since it's
unusable anyway.
Also remove an usage in SpecialAbuseLog, likely a rebase artefact.
Change-Id: I938924b3617ef30046d8317e68a101ed2c1883d3
This replaces the previous pattern of callers having to use
RevisionLookup if the result was 'implicit'. Also, in some cases where
we were just hiding things if the visibility was !== true, properly
handle the implicit case by using the new method. Make the new method
return string constants rather than bool|string.
The new method also fixes some potential info leaks which happened when
the row was hidden, the user could view suppressed AbuseLog entries, but
the associated revision was also deleted and the user couldn't see it
(this shouldn't be relevant for WMF wikis since AF deletion is
oversight-level).
Also add a bunch of tests for the various cases to ensure we don't
regress again.
Bug: T261532
Change-Id: I929f865acf5d207b739cb3af043f70cb59243ee0
ParserStatus is now more lightweight, and doesn't know about "result"
and "from cache". Instead, it has an isValid() method which is merely a
shorthand for checking whether getException() is null.
Introduce a child class, RuleCheckerStatus, which knows about result and
cache and can be (un)serialized.
This removes the ambiguity of the $result field, and helps the
transition to a new RuleChecker class.
Change-Id: I0dac7ab4febbfdabe72596631db630411d967ab5
Something somewhere is leaving error_reporting in a dirty state
causing AbuseFilter's ConsequencesExecutorTest case to fail for
the core change Ic9fee6cdd88001025.
Per T253461, we're meant to eventually remove this anyway, so might
as well remove it in areas that are known to get it wrong somehow.
Change-Id: I2a665f09a357f2f2cc258d8c4011d49a7ab9c13b
The old parser now has the correct name "Evaluator", so the
ParserFactory name was outdated. Additionally, the plan is to create a
new RuleChecker class, acting as a facade for the different
parsing-related stages (lexer, parser, evaluator, etc.), which is what
most if not all callers should use. The RuleCheckerFactory still returns
a FilterEvaluator for now.
Also, "Parser" is a specific term defining *how* things happen
internally, whereas "RuleChecker" describes *what* callers should expect
from the new class.
Change-Id: I25b47a162d933c1e385175aae715ca38872b1442
Remove unnecessary setters, injecting everything in the constructor.
These were leftovers from before the introduction of ParserFactory.
Remove public access to the conds used, include the information inside
the returned ParserStatus instead, and consequently simplify callers.
Change-Id: I0a30e044877c6c858af3ff73f819d5ec7c4cc769
