Per discussions, its proposed that the target of all media queries
is defined in the entry points skin and skin-legacy
Please verify with `git diff HEAD^ -w` that no changes to print
styles have occurred
Bug: T253842
Change-Id: Id7d1c806d77ee50335a1c9985acc7e4406e64ccf
This separation introduced in I8dbc29b7a19f7f doesn't work as well
as expected. All but strictly `.mw-jump-link` rule are typographic
rules.
In the current mish-mash of when to apply typographic styles only to
article content (`.mw-body`, `mw-body-content`, `.mw-parser-output`,
`#mw-data-after-content`?) inherited from core, it makes looking up
and finding issues between typographic styles harder, and leads to
unnecessary complexity instead of clean separation of concerns.
This question surfaced in where would link styles belong originated in
T213778.
Change-Id: I521185d505d8688f076dd09acbedb22e801f772e
Using 'skin' as entrance point files, similar to already existing
convention in MediaWiki land with 'skin.json' or 'SkinVector.php' as
example in Vector skin. Replacing Apache inspired 'index' convention.
Also renaming legacy to 'skin-legacy' to be clear on file base that it's
a modification of 'skin'.
Bug: T249073
Change-Id: Ief1c469724d4ffe238d307407c3ddb46f2e1abfa
2020-05-28 20:58:01 -07:00
Renamed from resources/skins.vector.styles/legacy.less (Browse further)
