- Update package.json with the new dependencies.
- A script storybook.sh pulls down CSS and LESS imports from external
dependencies. This copies the approach taken in Popups and MobileFrontend.
- Icons from external repos are maintained within the repo in SVG-only form.
Using load.php modules is also possible, but will pull down other unnecessary icons
and break if any of these modules are changed. Decided that we should manually maintain
these for the time being given there are only 3 icons.
- Several LESS files now import the variables file. I think it's useful for stories
to only import the CSS they use as this encourages us to modularise our CSS. Before these
imports were not necessary as they inherit imports from index.less. This will have no impact
on the bundle size as the LESS compiler silently discards duplicate imports
- stories/utils.js provides a useful placeholder function for generalising our hook entry
points.
Bug: T242674
Change-Id: I722e84d2fb57653a2f96142dc3e5248043261746
Use a template variable only for html attributes of the logo
Move static HTML into Navigation.mustache
Change-Id: If37015b9ce4f37e264b6f25956e4d0ca35e8cdff
This will allow us to render in Storybook without having issues
with unclosed tags. it also mirrors how html-headelement works
(obscuring the opening of the body and html tags)
Bug: T240062
Bug: T242674
Change-Id: I216a920c68bf3da9de55a75fc53451c68c9cc753
A Portal (or portlet) in the Vector context is a section of the
sidebar menu (e.g. Tools, Languges etc.).
The hook that places content between the portals (or portlets?)
such as `SkinTemplateToolboxEnd` and `otherlanguages` has been
enclosed inside of an output buffer so that any content it
produces can be passed to a template.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I882db161e5462cf88aa48c9cfd91448eb97a4a77
Extracts a new VectorMenu mustache component from VectorTemplate.
VectorMenu is the "more" menu that appears at small widths instead of the
Read/Edit/View History menu near the top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I41b1ec949d81303abddadb981741445572c939e3
PersonalMenu is the login/logout notifications etc. menu at the very
top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: Iae224cbd838e44669a9f27e6dd303c6c3b402d41
For consistency with VectorTabs, rename SearchComponent to only imply
component. At least two word names seems like a good target (instead of
just "Search") for grepability and standard component style conventions.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I1e4f7270ba29c2f35f08e92f8a28cd8a2ec8fe87
Creates a new VectorTabs.mustache component and uses it to render
the namespace & view tabs.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I859e4e95a2a12470f66564db547679c9f0a16727
Extract SearchComponent.mustache from VectorTemplate. The "search"
message is now escaped by the template parser. As is, htmlspecialchars()
for "wgScript".
A later patch will change each component renderer function as well as
renderNavigation() to return a string.
Change-Id: I3084b7e0ef73d320c85ee780c9eff13ecea92906
Regression from 74b9803d9a, caused by a bug in LightNCandy which
caused {{foo}} to render "0", and {{#foo}} to pass as true with "0", but then
in {{#foo}}<b>{{foo}}</b>{{/foo} render as empty string producing "<b></b>".
In other words, the conditional is passing and the inner block is executed,
but the placeholder is mistakenly converting "0" => null => "" (empty string),
causing the <h1> to render but without any text in it.
Work around this bug by simply removing the conditional. Several other skins
already don't have this conditional and it's unclear why or in what
situation MediaWiki would send OutputPage to SkinTemplate without a title.
I think it would make sense in such rare case to still have a consistent
layout for extensions and gadgets to interact with and not omit the H1
element, but render it with the value that OutputPage gave it, even if it
is the empty string.
Bug: T219864
Change-Id: I6e04b512d2fe2e949ff5385cb38ceebe392fb255
This reverts commit a3ca2c3e16.
Reason for revert: This requires wider discussion before moving
forward, and a more complete implementation even once we do have
consensus.
No associated task exists on which to view or continue this
discussion: linked task briefly mentions Mustache in general as an
option as part of a much wider topic, but doesn't concern this
specifically.
Issues that should be discussed include:
* What the intent even is here: is this for one skin only? Is this
the intended path forward for all of them? Depending on which, we
have other issues: for the former case, that it is quite
unhelpful in terms of maintenance and further development having
more random code diversity out there, especially in this
half-completed state; or if it is indeed intended for all of them,
that an RfC is needed before anything is merged, as that is a very
significant change.
* That using Mustache in MediaWiki does add (usually minor)
performance overhead; we need to clearly establish in the task that
this is indeed worth it here.
Change-Id: I0bafa55b554aa8a38553e20c75859ec5eec2c062