As part of moving search into header work, a min-width (via
@min-width-supported variable) was introduced on the body and takes
effect when the search feature is enabled.
However, given a min-width already exists on the page container from the
max-width work, I'm wondering if it makes sense to replace that one with
the @min-width-supported variable as it seems like we should only have
one min-width vs. having two.
Note: As a bonus, this has the (unintended but helpful) side-effect of
mitigating the sidebar button being blocked by the personal menu at
small viewport widths (T258465).
[1] I7f8059d43eaab49de362405784b34a4fe502c7b0
Bug: T258465
Change-Id: I920cd0e9d1564c82bcdc89b721352620158073c6
To support roll out and avoid issues with cached HTML the new
styles for the new search feature are restricted to HTML where
the body tag has `skin-vector-search-header` class.
For legacy mode, we introduce a new class
`skin-vector-search-header-legacy` and temporarily use a CSS3 `:not()`
selector to ensure the styles ship during the phase where cached
HTML can be served. While this will create some display issues in
browsers that do not support CSS3 selectors, all grade A browsers in
our compatability matrix support this.
Bug: T249363
Change-Id: I7f8059d43eaab49de362405784b34a4fe502c7b0
This will help mitigate the sidebar overflowing the page container
(related to T257518). Note that this does not prevent the overflow from
happening as the sidebar can still be longer than the viewport, but it
should reduce the number of times it can happen.
Bug: T257518
Change-Id: Id7138b4d4459242772bee8e11dc7edeaf76b3ca0
* `mw-content-container` now wraps the footer (as well as the content)
because we want the footer to match the content width at all times and
to expand with the content when the sidebar is closed (at small viewport
widths or when on history/special pages)
* `mw-footer-container` margins were replaced with padding to avoid
issues with margin collapsing.
* Applied a white background to sidebar to handle the case of the
sidebar overflowing the `mw-page-container`. When that happens, we at
least want the text in the sidebar to be legible.
* Closely related, `mw-page-container`'s `overflow: hidden` style was
removed to prevent `mw-page-container` from cutting off the sidebar. The
purpose of this style was make it appear as if the sidebar was being
hidden by `mw-page-container`, but tweaking the sidebar's translation
animation to achieves this effect as well.
Bug: T257518
Change-Id: I89edf89b2ac4abe2053f0c9b366f143133ff420f
This patch closely follows the desired guidelines/desired
styles Alex Hollender has put forth in his prototype, but uses
multiple containers to achieve this look since our DOM order/structure
is different than the DOM structure in the prototype. The following
containers are used, but unlike his prototype, they are sometimes used
more than once:
* Page Container: Contains every other container and limits the overall
max-width of the white part of the page.
* Workspace Container: Contains the sidebar and content container. The
sidebar is displaced ~30 pixels to the start (left) of the workspace
container at all times.
* Content Container: Contains the content. The max-width of this changes
depending on whether you are on a special page/history page vs. other
pages.
* Article Toolbar Container: Contains the article toolbar. The max-width
of this is always the same as the max-width of the article content as we
don't want the toolbar to move when going from the article page to the
history/special page.
Changes to be aware:
* To test locally, `$wgVectorLayoutMaxWidth = true;`. This design is
temporarily feature flagged and defaults to being "off".
* Note that layout-max-width.less is a temporary file made to meet the
feature flag requirement of T246420 (intended to derisk the deployment).
After the deploy, we should merge most if not all of the rules into
layout.less where the max-width design will become the default.
* Per Jon's code review comment, I have relaxed the indenting of
skin.mustache to make the diff easier to reason about. If desired, the
correct indenting can be achieved in a (much less risky) follow-up
commit.
Bug: T246420
Bug: T153043
Change-Id: Ie49f629bc705850c6996164a516957476c034048
