Carved out from I8e6e283db5d4034861f8d50d9b3f211df1a78c6c.
It makes sense to have a variable defined for that value.
Change-Id: Iaaca1fd7c15a0c121e60b5ae6debf4bf6920168e
`padding: 0` was either a rule targeting very early Operas or
Netscape/Firefox or came out of Eric Meyer's reset.css as
misappropriation.
normalize.css haven't had it in v1.0.0, only relied on `margin: 0`
normalization for IE 6 & 7.
Change-Id: I3d2894a1e68414b64751bd6ebe7e1af77d260ee7
Per discussions, its proposed that the target of all media queries
is defined in the entry points skin and skin-legacy
Please verify with `git diff HEAD^ -w` that no changes to print
styles have occurred
Bug: T253842
Change-Id: Id7d1c806d77ee50335a1c9985acc7e4406e64ccf
Use normal `background-image` properties with SVGs only now
that IE 8 and Android 2.1 is removed from Grade C.
Also removing all PNG fallback images.
Bug: T248062
Change-Id: Ib91cd0514d331ab6a0f8b668aef6991cf3267fe2
In future we will be displaying the header and logo in the print
display - to avoid adding unnecessary borders scope this rule.
Bug: T253842
Change-Id: I123b73fcaa09c0213914ca6fd8074a1305814529
This separation introduced in I8dbc29b7a19f7f doesn't work as well
as expected. All but strictly `.mw-jump-link` rule are typographic
rules.
In the current mish-mash of when to apply typographic styles only to
article content (`.mw-body`, `mw-body-content`, `.mw-parser-output`,
`#mw-data-after-content`?) inherited from core, it makes looking up
and finding issues between typographic styles harder, and leads to
unnecessary complexity instead of clean separation of concerns.
This question surfaced in where would link styles belong originated in
T213778.
Change-Id: I521185d505d8688f076dd09acbedb22e801f772e
Both properties are needed for normalizing different browsers (`padding`
infamous on older Operas) and are only needed on `body`.
Change-Id: I661869ed43491824cbfe86dc36e39f97e29ccf8a
Normalizing focus styles in Blink based browsers and aligning to
Design Style Guide components.
Bug: T245887
Change-Id: I4d571dcbbada5edffbfee631c8b438cf7c8d273a
Using 'skin' as entrance point files, similar to already existing
convention in MediaWiki land with 'skin.json' or 'SkinVector.php' as
example in Vector skin. Replacing Apache inspired 'index' convention.
Also renaming legacy to 'skin-legacy' to be clear on file base that it's
a modification of 'skin'.
Bug: T249073
Change-Id: Ief1c469724d4ffe238d307407c3ddb46f2e1abfa
* Standardise the menu markup. This means all menus in Vector will now
be wrapped in a div and will have a heading.
* All menus now have the vector-menu class. Styles specific to personal tools
are moved to layout since these are concerned with placement.
* The ul class will always have menu class.
* emptyPortal class is generalised into vector-menu-empty for consistency
with other classes and moved from common.less into Menu.less
* Standardise hooks - BaseTemplateAfterPortlet can now be run on any
menu.
Changes to HTML:
* lang and dir attributes are moved from the h3 up to the div element
.vectorTabs, .portal(s) and #p-personal now has hidden span element inside h3
* for non portals ul.menu" is now wrapped in a div.vector-menu-content
This change does impact the following CSS selectors which will need to be updated:
I see no matches for these selectors in code search.
```
#p-variants > ul
#p-namespaces > ul
#p-personal > ul
#p-views > ul
#p-cactions > ul
```
Using global-search.toolforge.org I see one match
for p-variants, 26 for p-namespaces, 30 for p-personal,
36 for p-views and 7 for p-cactions. I see this as acceptable
breakage provided a user notice is sent out which it has been
(T252447)
Bug: T249372
Change-Id: Id59234aa6b822a24848386bdc04d8d7ed37ca145
Moving styles from the existing styles to common/layout
or components stylesheets they should be associated with.
Components are identified using PascalCase. Lowercase names are used for things
that are not components. This distinction should help us reason with the code
better and make it clearer where CSS belongs, saving us lots of wasted
effort discussing conventions.
Patch isn't making actual CSS changes themselves - for testing purposes this
should be a NOOP.
In preparation for the gradient removal,
'background-gradient.less' is marked as legacy.
Merged 'externalLinks.less' into content.less, they belong to content.
Bug: T249073
Change-Id: I8dbc29b7a19f7613b57b0984a8befaeae9c08798
