Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jdlrobson 6d9e7c07e5 Tests: Always set Skin
VectorTemplate relies on many of SkinVector's methods. To future
proof these tests we need to set the skin in the mocked object.

Bug: T251212
Change-Id: Ifd9bbc9c909626ecfe8ccd085673bc777423d560
2020-05-02 16:57:04 -07:00
jdlrobson b42493a476 Refactor: DRY up menu creation!
Bug: T249372
Change-Id: I098e6921e8f7ef65dacacf09b9c25f70c945e58e
2020-04-27 13:36:39 -07:00
jdlrobson 0b8693ccec Refactor: Make VectorTabs template data conform with MenuDefinition
menu-id -> id
menu-label-id -> label-id
msg-label -> label
empty-portlet -> class

Bug: T249372
Change-Id: I15fd88269b3d111ff47e64f3669575afaeea9f97
2020-04-22 05:18:44 +00:00
jdlrobson 286b07b20a Refactor: Make VectorMenu template data conform with MenuDefinition
menu-id -> id
menu-label-id -> label-id
msg-label -> label
empty-portlet -> class

Bug: T249372
Change-Id: I50bf2424f9077ac987e03a1e552577bf7c48b3bb
2020-04-22 05:18:29 +00:00
Nicholas Ray ec382a8c86 Add opt-out link to Sidebar for Vector/Logged-in Users Without Abstractions
This commit is singularly focused on adding a link to the sidebar for
Vector, logged-in users. It does the bare minimum to fulfill the
requirements of T243281.

Additionally, it will help to answer the question "Do we need to use
abstractions (other than maybe different templates) to separate Legacy
Vector from Vector" by intentionally leaving out any abstractions in
order to make it easier to compare with a follow-up patch
(Ib2ef15180df73360cc1de25b893e49d415d23e1a) which does use abstractions.

It is a good thing to question whether or not we need addtional
abstractions in VectorTemplate and if they will help us as unnecessary
abstractions can have the opposite effect and just lead to further
frustrations down the road.

Therefore, I urge you, the reviewer, to let me know your thoughts! If
abstractions are viewed as not making our lives any easier, the
follow-up patches may be completely discarded and that's totally okay
with me. :) I think it's a good think to talk about now though.

Important changes:

* The VectorTemplate constructor was changed to allow injecting the
config, templateParser, and isLegacy boolean (only the config was
allowed before this commit). According to MediaWiki's Stable Interface
Policy, "Constructor signatures are generally considered unstable unless
explicitly declared stable for calling" [3]. Given that VecorTemplate's
constructor is not marked as stable, it is justified to do this without
warning according to the policy.

* Due to the above, the 'setTemplate' method is no longer needed and was
marked as deprecated.

* VectorTemplateTest was made to adapt to the new VectorTemplate
constructor. Additionally, it now extends from
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase which my intelliphense server can pick up.
I *think* MediaWikiTestCase is just an alias to
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase [1] and MediaWikiTestCase file was renamed
to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase in [2], but I'm willing to change it
back if there is pushback to this.

Open questions:

* What are VectorTemplate's responsibilities? To me, it acts right now
as a controller (because it echos the full HTML string from the
template), a model (because SkinTemplate::prepareQuickTemplate sets data
on it which it later retrieves through `$this->get()`), a presenter
(because it adds data tailored for a web-centric view), and a view
(because it renders HTML strings instead of letting the view/template be
solely responsible for that). Arguably, some business logic might be
mixed in there as well (because it checks to see if a User is logged
in/has necessary permissions to show x which my changes here add to).
This might not be a problem if we keep VectorTemplate relatively small,
but will it remain this way as we progress further in Desktop
Improvements?

* How do we write tests for VectorTemplate without exposing unnecessary
public methods? For example, if I want to test the `getSkinData()`
method to see what state will be sent to the template, how should I do
this? One option might be to use `TestingAccessWrapper` to expose these
private methods which is what
`VectorTemplateTest::testbuildViewsProps()` does. Another option is to
accept this method as public. Is there a better way? Keep in mind that
even with access to this method, there might be many things to mock.

[1] 0030cb525b/tests/common/TestsAutoLoader.php (L64)
[2] Ie717b0ecf4fcfd089d46248f14853c80b7ef4a76
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Stable_interface_policy

Bug: T243281
Change-Id: I0571b041bcd7f19bec9f103fa7bccdd093f6394d
2020-03-26 17:39:47 -06:00
jdlrobson 698752e38a [Dev] processTemplate used in one place
Moving all the templateParser calls to one function
so its easier to see how the template is composed.

The diff of changes to the stories folder highlight
the internal changes which are:

* html-portals replaced with html-sidebar in main template
* new Sidebar template added which outputs to html-sidebar
* Mention of "MainMenu" replaced with better understood "Sidebar"

This is precursory work to adopt templatePartials

Change-Id: I6b2196e39087f818e774d04b2d1b9ab8cb8816a1
2020-02-26 12:28:40 -08:00
polishdeveloper 09671d768f Introduce PHPUnit tests in Vector
To make it happen, we also need to provide a way to
inject different TemplateParser.

Change-Id: I14d8474a2b52f040b688245cbd5bd6f12dddf846
2020-01-31 16:48:43 +01:00