VectorTemplate has various functions that repeat themselves, only
differing in their choice of names.
This refactor begins by focusing on the personal menu and introducing
a generic getMenuData function. Hardcoded `p-personal` is replaced with
an `id` template key and `msg-label` is renamed `label`.
Future patches will simplify VectorTemplate by using this new
function.
You'll note the resulting PersonalMenu.mustache file is identical
to VectorTabs. These will be merged in I098e6921e8f7ef65dacacf09b9c25f70c945e58e
Bug: T249372
Change-Id: I5ae44a1008b065381eeff93f9fa625be5c5a9de9
The Mustache templates were a bit of a mix of tabs and spaces. I like
spaces personally but dislike inconsistency within the project more. Use
tabs.
Change-Id: I22b777489d7281b42d1ab1981b47b2a71d3b639a
Adding `margin-top` property only with sibling selector for now
until cache is cleared.
Also removing already inherited from
`.mw-body-content` properties `position`,
`font-size` and `line-height` of same value.
Bug: T248761
Change-Id: I1ea5e08927a96ac69c1b65f248ae0420968b4d00
The new template 'index.mustache' drops the Navigation
template partial (component) - instead embedding it in
the master template given its lack of usability.
Note to reviewer: Please ensure index.mustache and
legacy.mustache are identical.
Change-Id: I580fe55ca6aeb35dae8afee41e87172a5a729c7b
It is not the most useful of components and adds an additional layer
of complexity similar to multiple inheritance chains that we find in
Object oriented programming.
I suggest we use index.mustache going forward for laying out the different
components and use components/template partials for reusable components.
Change-Id: I6fd5fe1c3d3826d737ccd8ed5a38890305664876
This commit is singularly focused on adding a link to the sidebar for
Vector, logged-in users. It does the bare minimum to fulfill the
requirements of T243281.
Additionally, it will help to answer the question "Do we need to use
abstractions (other than maybe different templates) to separate Legacy
Vector from Vector" by intentionally leaving out any abstractions in
order to make it easier to compare with a follow-up patch
(Ib2ef15180df73360cc1de25b893e49d415d23e1a) which does use abstractions.
It is a good thing to question whether or not we need addtional
abstractions in VectorTemplate and if they will help us as unnecessary
abstractions can have the opposite effect and just lead to further
frustrations down the road.
Therefore, I urge you, the reviewer, to let me know your thoughts! If
abstractions are viewed as not making our lives any easier, the
follow-up patches may be completely discarded and that's totally okay
with me. :) I think it's a good think to talk about now though.
Important changes:
* The VectorTemplate constructor was changed to allow injecting the
config, templateParser, and isLegacy boolean (only the config was
allowed before this commit). According to MediaWiki's Stable Interface
Policy, "Constructor signatures are generally considered unstable unless
explicitly declared stable for calling" [3]. Given that VecorTemplate's
constructor is not marked as stable, it is justified to do this without
warning according to the policy.
* Due to the above, the 'setTemplate' method is no longer needed and was
marked as deprecated.
* VectorTemplateTest was made to adapt to the new VectorTemplate
constructor. Additionally, it now extends from
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase which my intelliphense server can pick up.
I *think* MediaWikiTestCase is just an alias to
MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase [1] and MediaWikiTestCase file was renamed
to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase in [2], but I'm willing to change it
back if there is pushback to this.
Open questions:
* What are VectorTemplate's responsibilities? To me, it acts right now
as a controller (because it echos the full HTML string from the
template), a model (because SkinTemplate::prepareQuickTemplate sets data
on it which it later retrieves through `$this->get()`), a presenter
(because it adds data tailored for a web-centric view), and a view
(because it renders HTML strings instead of letting the view/template be
solely responsible for that). Arguably, some business logic might be
mixed in there as well (because it checks to see if a User is logged
in/has necessary permissions to show x which my changes here add to).
This might not be a problem if we keep VectorTemplate relatively small,
but will it remain this way as we progress further in Desktop
Improvements?
* How do we write tests for VectorTemplate without exposing unnecessary
public methods? For example, if I want to test the `getSkinData()`
method to see what state will be sent to the template, how should I do
this? One option might be to use `TestingAccessWrapper` to expose these
private methods which is what
`VectorTemplateTest::testbuildViewsProps()` does. Another option is to
accept this method as public. Is there a better way? Keep in mind that
even with access to this method, there might be many things to mock.
[1] 0030cb525b/tests/common/TestsAutoLoader.php (L64)
[2] Ie717b0ecf4fcfd089d46248f14853c80b7ef4a76
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Stable_interface_policy
Bug: T243281
Change-Id: I0571b041bcd7f19bec9f103fa7bccdd093f6394d
* Content.mustache doc param order was modified to follow the html structure
order (with html-dataAfterContent at bottom ). `html-userlangattributes`
was added to param documention since it was absent.
* Footer.mustache doc param order was modified to follow the html structure
order (with `html-userlangattributes` placed after `html-vector-before-footer`)
* Navigation.mustache was modified to remove `html-sidebar`,
`html-navigation-left-tabs` and `html-navigation-right-tabs` params from
doc since those are absent from Navigation.mustache.
* `data-namespace-tabs`, `data-variants`, `data-page-actions`,
`data-page-actions-more`, `data-search-box`, `data-sidebar` params were
added in Navigation.mustache documentation since those are present.
Bug: T243281
Change-Id: I321f8d61ad0305f508521e8d4d805e846103b357
Lift the mists of confusion by checking that all JavaScript types align.
No ignores! This is the JavaScript equivalent to Phan.
This patch adds the necessary infrastructure for verifying typing and
fixes the few flaws found.
Bug: T239262
Change-Id: I2557471421196ea46cd13dfb786a52968fbfcc97
This allows us to insert HTML underneath the first portal or wrap
the portal in a containing element in future if we want to target
additional CSS to it
Change-Id: Ied28d95407b8d59fc819bb07a2cce3242bd93088
CHANGES to index.mustache:
Changes can be understood by looking at the diff of
the file stories/skin.stories.js
The additional changes in stories folder export the data passed to
those templates. A new file is used as exporting any variable in a
file suffixed stories.js will be assumed to be a story entry.
The changes to index.mustache are as follows:
* html-footer is replaced with data-footer and Footer
component is rendered via template partial
* html-navigation is replaced with data-navigation and
Navigation component is rendered via template partial
CHANGES to Navigation.mustache:
Changes are best explained by looking at the diff to
stories/navigation.stories.js
and navigation.stories.data.js
* html-personal-menu is replaced with data-personal-menu
Bug: T245456
Change-Id: Ie96e92447a932b8a7f3844df277a1d31a2af423c
Moving all the templateParser calls to one function
so its easier to see how the template is composed.
The diff of changes to the stories folder highlight
the internal changes which are:
* html-portals replaced with html-sidebar in main template
* new Sidebar template added which outputs to html-sidebar
* Mention of "MainMenu" replaced with better understood "Sidebar"
This is precursory work to adopt templatePartials
Change-Id: I6b2196e39087f818e774d04b2d1b9ab8cb8816a1
- Update package.json with the new dependencies.
- A script storybook.sh pulls down CSS and LESS imports from external
dependencies. This copies the approach taken in Popups and MobileFrontend.
- Icons from external repos are maintained within the repo in SVG-only form.
Using load.php modules is also possible, but will pull down other unnecessary icons
and break if any of these modules are changed. Decided that we should manually maintain
these for the time being given there are only 3 icons.
- Several LESS files now import the variables file. I think it's useful for stories
to only import the CSS they use as this encourages us to modularise our CSS. Before these
imports were not necessary as they inherit imports from index.less. This will have no impact
on the bundle size as the LESS compiler silently discards duplicate imports
- stories/utils.js provides a useful placeholder function for generalising our hook entry
points.
Bug: T242674
Change-Id: I722e84d2fb57653a2f96142dc3e5248043261746
Use a template variable only for html attributes of the logo
Move static HTML into Navigation.mustache
Change-Id: If37015b9ce4f37e264b6f25956e4d0ca35e8cdff
This will allow us to render in Storybook without having issues
with unclosed tags. it also mirrors how html-headelement works
(obscuring the opening of the body and html tags)
Bug: T240062
Bug: T242674
Change-Id: I216a920c68bf3da9de55a75fc53451c68c9cc753
A Portal (or portlet) in the Vector context is a section of the
sidebar menu (e.g. Tools, Languges etc.).
The hook that places content between the portals (or portlets?)
such as `SkinTemplateToolboxEnd` and `otherlanguages` has been
enclosed inside of an output buffer so that any content it
produces can be passed to a template.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I882db161e5462cf88aa48c9cfd91448eb97a4a77
Extracts a new VectorMenu mustache component from VectorTemplate.
VectorMenu is the "more" menu that appears at small widths instead of the
Read/Edit/View History menu near the top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: I41b1ec949d81303abddadb981741445572c939e3
PersonalMenu is the login/logout notifications etc. menu at the very
top of the Vector skin.
Bug: T239248, T240062
Change-Id: Iae224cbd838e44669a9f27e6dd303c6c3b402d41
For consistency with VectorTabs, rename SearchComponent to only imply
component. At least two word names seems like a good target (instead of
just "Search") for grepability and standard component style conventions.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I1e4f7270ba29c2f35f08e92f8a28cd8a2ec8fe87
Creates a new VectorTabs.mustache component and uses it to render
the namespace & view tabs.
Bug: T239248
Change-Id: I859e4e95a2a12470f66564db547679c9f0a16727
Extract SearchComponent.mustache from VectorTemplate. The "search"
message is now escaped by the template parser. As is, htmlspecialchars()
for "wgScript".
A later patch will change each component renderer function as well as
renderNavigation() to return a string.
Change-Id: I3084b7e0ef73d320c85ee780c9eff13ecea92906
Regression from 74b9803d9a, caused by a bug in LightNCandy which
caused {{foo}} to render "0", and {{#foo}} to pass as true with "0", but then
in {{#foo}}<b>{{foo}}</b>{{/foo} render as empty string producing "<b></b>".
In other words, the conditional is passing and the inner block is executed,
but the placeholder is mistakenly converting "0" => null => "" (empty string),
causing the <h1> to render but without any text in it.
Work around this bug by simply removing the conditional. Several other skins
already don't have this conditional and it's unclear why or in what
situation MediaWiki would send OutputPage to SkinTemplate without a title.
I think it would make sense in such rare case to still have a consistent
layout for extensions and gadgets to interact with and not omit the H1
element, but render it with the value that OutputPage gave it, even if it
is the empty string.
Bug: T219864
Change-Id: I6e04b512d2fe2e949ff5385cb38ceebe392fb255
This reverts commit a3ca2c3e16.
Reason for revert: This requires wider discussion before moving
forward, and a more complete implementation even once we do have
consensus.
No associated task exists on which to view or continue this
discussion: linked task briefly mentions Mustache in general as an
option as part of a much wider topic, but doesn't concern this
specifically.
Issues that should be discussed include:
* What the intent even is here: is this for one skin only? Is this
the intended path forward for all of them? Depending on which, we
have other issues: for the former case, that it is quite
unhelpful in terms of maintenance and further development having
more random code diversity out there, especially in this
half-completed state; or if it is indeed intended for all of them,
that an RfC is needed before anything is merged, as that is a very
significant change.
* That using Mustache in MediaWiki does add (usually minor)
performance overhead; we need to clearly establish in the task that
this is indeed worth it here.
Change-Id: I0bafa55b554aa8a38553e20c75859ec5eec2c062
