mediawiki-skins-Vector/i18n/en.json

59 lines
3.4 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

{
"@metadata": {
"authors": []
},
"skinname-vector": "Vector legacy (2010)",
"skinname-vector-2022": "Vector (2022)",
"vector-specialversion-name": "Vector",
"vector-skin-desc": "Provides 2 Vector skins:\n* 2011 - The Modern version of MonoBook with fresh look and many usability improvements.\n* 2022 - The Vector built as part of the WMF [[mw:Desktop Improvements]] project.",
[Special:Preferences] [PHP] Add skin version user preference and configs Add a Vector-specific user preference to Special:Preferences for toggling skin version, either Legacy Vector or the latest Vector. The presentation of the new preference section and the default values for anonymous, new, and existing accounts are configurable via $wgVectorShowSkinPreferences, $wgVectorDefaultSkinVersion (to be used by the feature manager in T244481), $wgVectorDefaultSkinVersionForExistingAccounts, and $wgVectorDefaultSkinVersionForNewAccounts. These configurations default to the fullest experience so that third-party configuration is minimal. See skin.json for details. The configurations are each tested in VectorHooksTest.php. When presentation is enabled, the new preference appears as a checkbox; enabled is Legacy mode and disable is latest. There are a number of unfortunate details: - Showing and hiding a checkbox is supported by OOUI. Showing and hiding a whole section (Vector skin preferences, in this case) is not so this additional client JavaScript functionality is added in Core (see Iaf68b238a8ac7a4fb22b9ef5d6c5a3394ee2e377). - Stylization as a checkbox is wanted. However, the implied storage type for OOUI checkboxes is a boolean. This is not wanted in the event that another skin version is added (e.g., '3' or 'alpha'). As a workaround, the preference is converted from a boolean to a version string ('1' or '2') on save in Hooks::onPreferencesFormPreSave() and from a version string to a checkbox enable / disable string ('1' or '0') in onGetPreferences(). There a number of test cases to help cover these concerning details. Documentation for overriding the skin version as a URL query parameter is provided in anticipation of T244481. Bug: T242381 Bug: T245793 Depends-On: Iaf68b238a8ac7a4fb22b9ef5d6c5a3394ee2e377 Depends-On: Ifc2863fca9cd9efd11ac30c780420e8d89e8cb22 Change-Id: I177dad88fc982170641059b6a4f53fbb38eefad6
2020-01-23 21:53:09 +00:00
"prefs-vector-enable-vector-1-label": "Use Legacy Vector",
"prefs-vector-enable-vector-1-help": "Over the next few years, we will be gradually updating the Vector skin. Legacy Vector will allow you to view the old version of Vector (as of December 2019). To learn more about the updates, go to our [[mw:Reading/Web/Desktop_Improvements|project page]].",
Add opt-out link to Sidebar for Vector/Logged-in Users Without Abstractions This commit is singularly focused on adding a link to the sidebar for Vector, logged-in users. It does the bare minimum to fulfill the requirements of T243281. Additionally, it will help to answer the question "Do we need to use abstractions (other than maybe different templates) to separate Legacy Vector from Vector" by intentionally leaving out any abstractions in order to make it easier to compare with a follow-up patch (Ib2ef15180df73360cc1de25b893e49d415d23e1a) which does use abstractions. It is a good thing to question whether or not we need addtional abstractions in VectorTemplate and if they will help us as unnecessary abstractions can have the opposite effect and just lead to further frustrations down the road. Therefore, I urge you, the reviewer, to let me know your thoughts! If abstractions are viewed as not making our lives any easier, the follow-up patches may be completely discarded and that's totally okay with me. :) I think it's a good think to talk about now though. Important changes: * The VectorTemplate constructor was changed to allow injecting the config, templateParser, and isLegacy boolean (only the config was allowed before this commit). According to MediaWiki's Stable Interface Policy, "Constructor signatures are generally considered unstable unless explicitly declared stable for calling" [3]. Given that VecorTemplate's constructor is not marked as stable, it is justified to do this without warning according to the policy. * Due to the above, the 'setTemplate' method is no longer needed and was marked as deprecated. * VectorTemplateTest was made to adapt to the new VectorTemplate constructor. Additionally, it now extends from MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase which my intelliphense server can pick up. I *think* MediaWikiTestCase is just an alias to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase [1] and MediaWikiTestCase file was renamed to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase in [2], but I'm willing to change it back if there is pushback to this. Open questions: * What are VectorTemplate's responsibilities? To me, it acts right now as a controller (because it echos the full HTML string from the template), a model (because SkinTemplate::prepareQuickTemplate sets data on it which it later retrieves through `$this->get()`), a presenter (because it adds data tailored for a web-centric view), and a view (because it renders HTML strings instead of letting the view/template be solely responsible for that). Arguably, some business logic might be mixed in there as well (because it checks to see if a User is logged in/has necessary permissions to show x which my changes here add to). This might not be a problem if we keep VectorTemplate relatively small, but will it remain this way as we progress further in Desktop Improvements? * How do we write tests for VectorTemplate without exposing unnecessary public methods? For example, if I want to test the `getSkinData()` method to see what state will be sent to the template, how should I do this? One option might be to use `TestingAccessWrapper` to expose these private methods which is what `VectorTemplateTest::testbuildViewsProps()` does. Another option is to accept this method as public. Is there a better way? Keep in mind that even with access to this method, there might be many things to mock. [1] https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/0030cb525be6cabc1d63de80586b2017d4bbe354/tests/common/TestsAutoLoader.php#L64 [2] Ie717b0ecf4fcfd089d46248f14853c80b7ef4a76 [3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Stable_interface_policy Bug: T243281 Change-Id: I0571b041bcd7f19bec9f103fa7bccdd093f6394d
2020-03-17 20:21:33 +00:00
"vector-opt-out": "Switch to old look",
"vector-opt-out-tooltip": "Change your settings to go back to the old look of the skin (legacy Vector)",
"vector.css": "/* All CSS here will be loaded for users of the Vector skin */",
"vector.js": "/* All JavaScript here will be loaded for users of the Vector skin */",
"vector-action-toggle-sidebar": "Toggle sidebar",
"vector-languages": "Languages",
"vector-language-button-aria-label": "Go to an article in another language. Available in {{PLURAL:$1|$1 language|$1 languages}}",
"vector-language-button-label": "{{PLURAL:$1|$1 language|$1 languages}}",
"vector-no-language-button-label": "Add languages",
"vector-no-language-button-aria-label": "This article exist only in this language. Add the article for other languages",
"vector-language-redirect-to-top": "On this {{SITENAME}} the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. [[#p-lang-btn|Go to top]].",
"vector-language-variant-switcher-label": "Change language variant",
"vector-action-addsection": "Add topic",
"vector-action-delete": "Delete",
"vector-action-move": "Move",
"vector-action-protect": "Protect",
"vector-action-undelete": "Undelete",
"vector-action-unprotect": "Change protection",
"vector-view-create": "Create",
"vector-view-edit": "Edit",
"vector-view-history": "View history",
"vector-view-view": "Read",
"vector-view-viewsource": "View source",
Re-implement and improve mw-jump links with pure CSS * Improve their accessibility by giving both links a full label "Jump to x" and "Jump to y" instead of "Jump to: ", "x", "y". This also makes things much better for localisation, for which we generally discourage use of concatenation. * Use pure CSS for the toggling of the visibility on focus, instead of relying on JavaScript. Especially given the JS comes form core's 'jquery.mw-jump' module, which is considered technical debt per T195256. Alternatively, that could be copied to vector.js, but pure CSS is possible, so why not. * Use plain <a> links in the HTML instead of wrapped in a <div>. This solves the long-standing problem whereby the margin between #contentSub and #mw-content-text had to be awkwardly negated and overridden in core and on various to make sure that the wrapper itself would become visible as needed, in a way that has margin around this. This whole problem doesn't apply when simply using inline links that aren't part of the regular flow with .mixin-screen-reader-text. On focus, the individually focussed link appears in regular flow, without the need for any custom styles. * This uses :not(:focus) to naturally make it render in the default way on focus, and visibibly hidden/clipped otherwise. This is supported in IE9+ and Android 2+. There is a way to make it work with CSS2 for IE7-8, by applying the mixin to '.mw-jump-link' only and then undoing all of 'position', 'width', 'height', 'clip', and 'margin' on :focus. But I'm not sure that's worth it here. The fallback in IE7-8 for not supporting ":not(:focus)" is that the accessibility link is simply visible always, which seems like a good fallback for accessibility, and doesn't hurt anything. Bug: T195256 Change-Id: Icaadb290f692b3617688d32cbb66dfb007f1c82c
2018-05-21 16:28:07 +00:00
"vector-jumptonavigation": "Jump to navigation",
"vector-jumptosearch": "Jump to search",
Switch to navigation-first DOM order under `$wgVectorIsSearchInHeader` feature flag This moves the header, navigation, sidebar, and article toolbar to be before the content in the DOM. As a result, a lot of absolute positioning logic can be removed and styles can be simplified. Note that although the sidebar was moved from the header into the workspace container allowing it to de-absolutely positioned, its absolute positioning was kept intact as it has a fair amount of complexity that should be handled in a separate task. To activate, set `$wgVectorIsSearchInHeader = true;` Changes that could cause concern: * The "jump to search" link was removed as the search is now much earlier in the DOM and I questioned the value of keeping this. However, it can be added back in if this change is contentious. * A "jump to content" link was added to account for the new DOM order. * Because the sidebar was taken out of the header, users will not be able to tab from the sidebar button into the sidebar without additional tweaking (e.g. should we add JS to enable this?). It was deemed that this work can be saved as a follow-up task. * I applied `overflow-y: auto` to the `mw-page-container` because the header's top margin was collapsing and caused whitespace to appear between the viewport and the header. Alternatively, we could apply a top padding to the page container and remove the header's top margin. I went for the simplest solution but am open to alternatives. * I left the footer as-is in this patch to minimize risk. It might be cleaner later on to move the footer inside the workspace container which would leave only one workspace container. Bug: T261802 Change-Id: Ic553fab3bde25769b103d899b92b3b694c00c384
2020-09-08 23:20:58 +00:00
"vector-jumptocontent": "Jump to content",
"vector-more-actions": "More",
"vector-search-loader": "Loading search suggestions",
"vector-searchsuggest-containing": "Search for pages containing <strong class=\"cdx-typeahead-search__search-footer__query\">$1</strong>",
"vector-intro-page": "Help:Introduction",
"vector-toc-label": "Contents",
"vector-toc-beginning": "Beginning",
"vector-toc-toggle-button-label": "Toggle $1 subsection",
"vector-anon-user-menu-pages": "Pages for logged out editors",
"vector-anon-user-menu-pages-learn": "learn more",
"vector-anon-user-menu-pages-label": "Learn more about editing",
"vector-main-menu-tooltip": "Main menu",
"vector-toc-menu-tooltip": "Table of Contents",
"vector-toc-collapsible-button-label": "Toggle the table of contents",
"vector-site-nav-label": "Site",
"vector-page-tools-label": "Tools",
"vector-pin-element-label": "move to sidebar",
"vector-unpin-element-label": "hide",
"vector-2022-prefs-talkpage": "[[mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop_Improvements|Discussion]]",
"tooltip-vector-anon-user-menu-title": "More options",
"vector-prefs-limited-width": "Enable limited width mode",
"vector-prefs-limited-width-help": "Enable limited width mode for improved reading experience."
}