Roan Kattouw 1bf58252ce Implement ve.dm.Surface.prototype.undo() and redo() in terms of change() ... ...or really changeInternal(), so we can avoid adding undo transactions to the undo stack. Also get rid of the pattern where undo() and redo() return a selection which the caller then has to restore, and instead just restore the selection. Bug: 53224 Change-Id: If5a3b4d4162e9f0713ee9cd26e79a66efe52770f		2013-10-25 18:29:48 +01:00
..
ve.ui.AnnotationAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00
ve.ui.ContentAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00
ve.ui.FormatAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00
ve.ui.HistoryAction.js	Implement ve.dm.Surface.prototype.undo() and redo() in terms of change()	2013-10-25 18:29:48 +01:00
ve.ui.IndentationAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00
ve.ui.InspectorAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00
ve.ui.ListAction.js	Remove ve.{inheritClass,mixinClass} and use OO instead	2013-10-18 18:58:08 +02:00