No longer need to manage the connection between outline items and
content pane pages.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I8dae7efa18e97ce5e1c84d963f1a32f09dd7e7cb
This was done in 3 rather "random" places:
1. Whenever a template is manually added. But rather late, after the
template was added, in an event handler that is about focus
behavior. It should not continue to manipulate the template that
was just added.
2. When the dialog opens with a template preloaded by name, as it is
done from the citation menu.
3. When the dialog is about to finish loading.
This patch fixes 2 issues:
* Get rid of a duplicate call (number 2 and 3) when using the
citation menu.
* Move number 1 to a place where it's executed much earlier, and
only when the user clicks "add template" in a template placeholder.
There is no other way to add a template to an existing transclusion,
but it's still a more appropriate place I feel.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I8a65ad703b95ba2092e9ef73493e9903e96b0dd6
It's never used in a different way. A lot of other code depends
heavily on this fact. Let's hard-code it.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: I65bbaea47341d74b49ce447c896eb2340f730e17
Technically the old BookletLayout sidebar is still there. But it's
never visible, effectively dead, and meant to be removed. This patch
just empties the OutlineItems of all template dialog related pages
without actually disabling the old sidebar.
Note this partly reverts Ie57f462.
Bug: T310859
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ic0b7d703f369045ed342426563f8eeb3e47046db
Value changes are triggerd and tracked from the parameter page and
change events will be forwared to the outline, if they are relevant.
Initial value is read from the model.
Bug: T308730
Change-Id: I0a3b0faf40aee44889404dcce31d850714360580
The outline item is only used by the new sidebar for the move and
remove flags it seems.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: Ia74e5b0e3dbf81e745137b181ed34a4d48dac42c
Parameters do not have an "OutlineItem" anymore so the code for
that was completely removed.
Bug: T310859
Change-Id: Ie57f462b8fda4505b99ee5bc9d788908d18d9c64
Removing a class name that's going to be deleted from places where
it's not strictly needed, e.g. comments.
Bug: T307188
Change-Id: Ifb14695d05510d2c0e25623afa99c4e84af3aaf9
I'm more in favor of leaving no garbage behind. The TODO with a date
is a good way of making sure this gets removed eventually.
This could have been part of Ie6eea76. The new code is added to the
same spot where the code removed in Ie6eea76 originally was.
Bug: T296471
Depends-On: Ie6eea76dacdc614ecb910c48e7e1f519b8c69322
Change-Id: Idec63201ff4aa52a0c53c6d007577a93c94e0ec0
Will be removed when parameters are added. Needs different margins
depending on beeing shown in the single transclusion mode without
header or on multiple transclusions.
Bug: T300710
Change-Id: Ieb95d7276aa4d4b0fcbb74f87ab734e4a393dc21
Same random finds while working on something else. I carefully
checked and made sure these methods are actually called without the
optional parameter.
Change-Id: Iab36fd130258322985b5d6e7f8e1f7b4ee235ba2
These are only needed when we need to access a specific `this` from
within another `function () {}` context. This is not the case in the
situations here.
This is split from Ibf25d7e to make it smaller and easier to argue
about.
Change-Id: Ide1476de91fc343aa992ad92a1321d3a38b06dd0
This option was added in 0.43.0. Now that the close button is handled,
the remaining functionality (store a flag in local storage, and fixing
link targets) doesn't really justify a separate class, especially as
it's currently only used once.
Change-Id: I0fd81cadccc077dbf957302f9f41409c5a1f4f20
Prevents accidentally treating plain text or user input
as HTML, which could be an XSS vulnerability.
Change-Id: Id4af48447a0907962a57340cb60aca08df9cc505
The "Add parameter" page always starts collapsed. Even if a template
doesn't contain anything but this. But most of the content isn't
visible, unless the user presses the button. It's not only a lot of
content, it's also rather expensive, including .parseDom(),
LinkCache.styleElement(), and ve.targetLinksToNewWindow(). This adds
up in large multi-part transclusions. In an example with 200 parts
the total blocking time goes down from 2.9s to 2.4s. Which means this
is not a major bottleneck, but still worth it.
Bug: T296335
Change-Id: Ieab9fd35d145142b04d2267d8e5a2e10a4c02784
This does have a significant impact on the performance of the
template dialog. Not only on construction time, but also because
MWExpandableContentElement objects do some quite expensive
.updateSize() calculations the moment they become visible.
I profiled a template with (only) 200 undocumented parameters.
Construction time goes down from ~600ms to ~520ms. The mentioned
.updateSize() runtime goes down from ~300ms to ~10ms.
Bug: T296335
Change-Id: I280f814e722b299aae0ec6a5a2fa59292e3e5887
This doesn't have much of an impact on performance according to my
profiling. But I think it's worth it nevertheless. The idea is to
skip that <div> entirely when it's empty.
Bug: T296335
Change-Id: Id155725fbc2e3453acc1cdcabfdc2d687285d694
