Fleshes out ve.dm.Annotation to a class. Annotations in the linear model
will be instances of a subclass of ve.dm.Annotation. Annotations are
defined by subclassing ve.dm.Annotation and registering this subclass
with ve.dm.AnnotationFactory.
ve.dm.AnnotationFactory keeps track of which annotation classes are known,
and has code to match an HTML element to an annotation class, for use in
the converter.
Change-Id: I68802bdb8736ced1f9e04ee49c623944b448141c
The cursor will move natively when it can, allowing for word jumping with alt/ctrl keys. Special conditions exist for slugs and node boundaries that result in programatic movement.
Change-Id: Ife156bf94d8192ddd322c016ca8359855b17d7fc
Removing check for insertAnnotations length because it's also important to know if we're pre-unannotating text.
Change-Id: I7fab39ca353d7656de3ce2985a821cb54384100e
Utility function to generate an opening HTML tag. Needed to integrate
the new annotation API with ve.ce.TextNode
Change-Id: I6804bbf6f79346fde1887fa82d29ec5cd0342d60
Previously, Undo used a transaction's lengthDifference to calculate the selection to display after the transaction was undone. Now, translateOffset with the reversed boolean set to true will properly translate the inverse of a transaction's selection change. Fixes bug #40538
Change-Id: I110bc0cbb5824547842efd391b9f2948b037b758
We were populating empty content nodes with zero-length text nodes to
make round-trip tests in the test suite work (otherwise blanking a
paragraph leaves behind a zero-length text node whereas creating an
empty paragraph does not), but the empty nodes are causing problems in
CE apparently.
* Do not create empty text nodes when constructing a node tree
* Be more careful with text-only replacements:
** Don't resize a text node to zero, remove it instead
** There may not be a text node to resize at all, build it in that case
** Switch nodeRange to nodeOuterRange, this was probably broken before
Tests:
* Change test case for zero-length text node to assert that there is
*no* zero-length text node :)
* Remove a test case concerning an empty text node from the
ve.ce.TextNode suite
Change-Id: Ie677457f2f0a7823a517ba3077b844ef52a20fcc
Previously tests for inheritClass (and other object management
utilities) were absent (as they were copied from upstream K-js).
I've copied the upstream test suite for this method here and
extended it with tests for this new feature.
Had to add es5:true to .jshintrc due to a bug in JSHint.
Repeated the setting in ve.inheritClass for future reference.
Source: https://github.com/Krinkle/K-js/blob/master/test/K.test.js
Change-Id: I63ac620d6ce7832ebfee454ddf7b7c90f6eb6121
This works just fine, as also previously tested/proven by
ve.cloneObject, which uses the same concept of creating an object
identical to what invoking the constructor with "new" would do,
but without invoking the constructor function (which has side-
effects).
Except in this case we do invoke the constructor function, but
we can't use new in ve.Factory because of the arbitrary number of
arguments.
Added a test to assert that 3+ arguments and that instanceof
work as expected.
Change-Id: If0add3da7475886e476900044acda2ba7d01fb11
Add some missing constructor names and rename the ones with a
lowercase 'v'.
I previously changed Object.create and others to using hasOwn,
but that turned out to be useless. The thought at the time was
to only use the native one if it really is a native one (and not
a polyfill from another script), however in then hasOwn is only
relevant on prototypes and when negated. For static members it
would be an own-property either way.
Follows-up:
* Id6783fcfc35a896db088ff424ff9faaabcaff716 (metanode)
* Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e (object-management)
Change-Id: Ia6ef597e5e5453277472dfc23f25d2878b68b7f6
I think what happened here is I added the skeleton code, Kranitor came through and removed the unused arguments, then I merged in my implementations without pulling, then pushed - git merged cleanly, the arguments I thought were there were not there, and tests broke.
Change-Id: I5aa2968fef164c774a10db83a6df1753c93cd2dc
Specifically, go to [[mw:VisualEditor/Feedback]] rather than [[mw:Visual editor/
Feedback]], as the primary set of pages on MWwiki have been moved some time ago
and right now we're stranding users' feedback messages at the wrong place.
Change-Id: Ia2ba0dad7d1bf0d1633fe2704a2e8354285c66da
