I forgot to adjust a range based on this.cursor for this.adjustment .
This indirectly caused Rob to get an exception when trying to wrap
the last node in the document, because the unadjusted range was past the
end of the document.
Change-Id: If9d5b76568fae25ba2c0f405f1c4fcdd8d879e4f
This fixes a bug where the second replace operation in a transaction
would cause the rebuild of the wrong range, or the adjustment of the
wrong text node.
Change-Id: I9b1c68d84999d538fe10bb193f4dfdd694121d2a
Copy-pasting things like "text<IMAGE>moretext" failed spectacularly,
this commit fixes that.
* Check for content rather than structure in the inserted/removed data
* In the content case
** Run selectNodes() over the removal range, rather than just the cursor
*** i.e. no longer assume that content replacements only affect one node
** If there is structure involved, rebuild all affected nodes
Change-Id: I80e40b5b7c514a3fb105d57e4a17770d0fefaaea
Splits and merges now work, or at least the tests for it pass
The strategy I used is to gather the affected ranges for each of the
following:
* removed stuff
* the entirety of each node touched by a non-zero removal
* if the inserted data busts out of its parent, the entirety of that
parent node (the 'scope')
then get the covering range of all those ranges, and rebuild that.
Change-Id: I7c3b421abc0ba134157ac8b59042675bb1b5073c
This means inserting things like </p><p> are now synced correctly and
split the paragraph in the model tree. Merges (removing e.g. </p><p>)
aren't supported yet.
Also, this needs tests, Trevor tells me he's working on porting replace
tests from the old ve/ directory
Change-Id: Ic5050849d7d007a1696dc36548654979aedb53a8
The tree sync for content replacements was adjusting the parent of the
text node affected, rather than the text node itself. This was because
it called getNodeFromOffset(), which returns branch nodes. Switched it
to use selectNodes() in leaves mode
Change-Id: I50a9be18151a1b75815ab19b787b16b6be385bf9
This makes TransactionProcessor work for regular replacements, as well
as insertions and deletions of self-contained pieces of data. This does
NOT yet work for inserting and deleting unbalanced data
(splitting/merging nodes).
I've tested this from the console for insertions and deletions and
simple replacements, but I haven't tested wrappings. We should write a
bunch of unit tests for this some time :)
Change-Id: Ic2fd75d1cf2e127bc9ae58debce67576be2c912f
* Add .process() and its helpers from ve1
* Fix applyAnnotations()
** Use data[i] rather than data[j]
** Don't add empty annotation objects for no reason
** Remove empty annotation objects
*** I thought this wasn't needed, but it is needed for clean rollbacks
* Remove unused second parameter in applyAnnotations() call
Change-Id: Ia338f62d2eaf2a76f8ef653eead05bc44757a122
* Also removed beforeSplice and afterSplice in favor of just plain splice which is the same as afterSplice used to be - beforeSplice was never used and it was making things more complex looking than needed
Change-Id: Icbbc57eac73a2a206ba35409ab57b3d1a49ab1a5