The promise is supposed to return a function that can be used
to lazily generate the visual diff, not the visual diff itself.
This was broken when switching to arrow functions.
Bug: T364635
Change-Id: Ifa971333aa22af346bb62d031dc20afc8979992c
This is not great, but it's a start (and unblocks other pull-throughs).
New changes:
c401efc98 build: Replace jsduck with jsdoc for documentation
16ba162a0 JSDoc: @mixins -> @mixes
9e0a1f53b JSDoc: Fix complex return types
449b6cc0f Prefer arrow function callbacks
1539af2c8 Remove 'this' bindings in arrow functions
b760f3b14 Use arrow functions in OO.ui.Process steps
57c24109e Use arrow functions in jQuery callbacks
9622ccef9 Convert some remaining functions callbacks to arrow functions
f6c885021 Remove useless local variable
1cd800020 Clear branch node cache when rebuilding tree
Bug: T250843
Bug: T363329
Change-Id: I0f4878ca84b95e3f388b358b943f105637e455f9
This reverts commit 5a54315fc2.
Reason for revert: Merged by mistake. Probably doesn't hurt, but
doesn't help either.
Change-Id: Ic38f1f0b0628968888763f15c85ef3a2f4a9890f
Small fix to support new HTML markup for headings, which will soon be
used by Parsoid page views (T269630) and by the old parser (T13555).
This fixes two issues that were only apparent when using
`$wgVisualEditorEnableVisualSectionEditing = true`:
* When starting an edit from a section edit link, the viewport was
not scrolled to align with the clicked heading and thus didn't
provide a smooth transition into edit mode.
* If the editor was started from a section edit link, then when
leaving the editor without saving changes, the viewport would jump
to the top of the page instead of returning to the clicked heading.
This is similar to change If71d4d8292 in MobileFrontend editor.
Bug: T13555
Change-Id: I89f8abac521e635f8eaa782703bdb6f6323098b0
This causes saveWorkflowBegin/saveIntent to fire as soon as the save
button is pressed. If edit check is enabled, it will be part of the save
workflow in timings.
Mobile was already behaving this way.
Bug: T352130
Change-Id: I3942fd63057c97365d28a443bcc5ac1cd43a8ae6
In MediaWiki, OO.ui.getTeleportTarget() is overridden to return
a different element (itself attached to body), which is supposed
to be styled appropriately by skins (e.g. z-index above any
floating header, font-size same as body text, etc.).
As a result, we no longer need to do weird things with the
'vector-body' class to achieve correct font size on Vector,
and we can remove some font-size overrides for Vector and MonoBook.
Bug: T348288
Bug: T339058
Change-Id: I6329b3023573b3dcfc8f471c4693be9bb1e9e430
Was lost when we converted it from a PopupTool
in I81d217bc1ab9.
Also visualeditor-help-title is unused since that commit,
and remove debugging code.
Change-Id: Ic1d40bac8ef76fbb6f009dd8cecec8dc74c1aa4b
I apparently forgot to pass the parameter to fireHookOnPageReload()
that I introduced exactly for this purpose. As a result, the basic
post-edit popup appeared, but the temp user popup did not.
Also rearrange code so that fireHookOnPageReload() is still called if
we need to redirect to complete creation of the temp user.
Bug: T344879
Change-Id: I36c64f27d2b8866ca88642621a135e7e25a91ce1
Abortable promises are definitely among my least favorite things.
It takes all of this bookkeeping to make .abort() work consistently
(so that it always aborts a request if one is in flight, and always
causes the final promise to be rejected even if we didn't start a
request yet or it has already finished). But, if you squint and ignore
every line with the word "abort", it's like a normal promise chain.
Depends-On: Iec8a15dadd595bed0f7e54f907fbb8e192b45cf3
Bug: T331397
Change-Id: I67309c79e6d211d69630fe89cbf5402f8fbd350c
A new hook `ve.preSaveProcess` is triggered to give other code the
chance to add steps to the process. The save dialog won't show until
the process completes. A step can be failed to return to normal
editing.
Change-Id: Id0740ff58ba9d9519c81174100ef1b8f8740870b
This method was only called, and the message was only shown, when
retrying after the first 'badtoken' error and refreshing the token
fails again.
If this happens, it usually indicates some terrible problem with
the wiki, and it is not something that can be fixed by logging in
again (or anything else the user can do).
Let the default API error message appear ("Invalid CSRF token.").
While not very helpful to the user, it should be more helpful to
the site administrator trying to unbreak their wiki.
Remove the "visualeditor-savedialog-identify-trylogin" message.
Keep "visualeditor-savedialog-error-badtoken", which is re-used
in another error message. I'll fix that separately.
Change-Id: Ib680218bce5ae38aa52d7d941218a6410ab7e09e
This has not been used for many, many years, since we started using
mw.Api#postWithToken, which automatically retries on 'badtoken' errors.
Most of our code for it was removed (e.g. save() is never called
with three parameters), but some comments and parameters remained.
Change-Id: Ibca2a222f808e6e2796ed6a61e9587a646afcf31
Occasionally we end up logging error codes like
"abusefilter-disallowed,abusefilter-disallowed,abusefilter-warning"
when someone hits a bunch of different filtes.
Change-Id: I967d374d13473ca684412b380d732653a3ceaff3
This makes it easier for 3rd parties to insert extra tools
in sensible places.
Change-Id: I6c8d0c96f53655d8f9ae9f01e5d0e1a1678d29a1
Depends-On: Ib8882fa6319915d291b345a69ab95f362739ad7b
