* Query permission errors for 'edit' and 'create' in the same way,
and consistently with how MediaWiki core EditPage does it.
* Prefer using Title::getUserPermissionsErrors() instead of custom
code for user blocks. The result is the same, except for an extra
line like "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the
following reason:".
Note that this loses the 'type' => 'block' property on each notice,
which was previously used to track when a block notice was shown.
This was however removed in 96de1353d3,
and could probably be re-implemented by using the root 'blockinfo'
property anyway.
* When Title::getUserPermissionsErrors() returns multiple messages
(for example, you're blocked *and* the page is protected),
display them all in a list instead of only the first one, using
OutputPage::formatPermissionsErrorMessage().
That method returns wikitext, which we have to parse ourselves. This
is a bit silly, but I found this approach in SpecialChangeContentModel
in MediaWiki core, so it should be fine.
Change-Id: Ifaf95d8aab836e45665b1fbdf98dd1980a867d8c
The message ends with "The latest log entry is provided below for
reference:", but we were not providing it. Use the same code as
'protectedpagewarning' and 'semiprotectedpagewarning', which behave
the same.
Change-Id: Ibe5463aa3d93cd1d6d6e3c0b9da82bfa2c813f86
The following sniffs are failing and were disabled:
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingDocumentationPrivate
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingParamName
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingParamTag
Change-Id: If59d450236a7d1afa3c6a05536abea819535f984
New changes:
b90385a44 Update OOUI to v0.36.2
95cf15506 doc: Point to gerrit, not Phabricator Diffusion
57689b9ed doc: Update copyright statement for new year
Change-Id: I3edd80c990101e4ba33163b1da5a45c300654977
It's supposed to be non-editable but deletable text, like mw:Entity.
We decided to handle them this way in 2015 but never implemented it
(T94509). Currently, accidentally editing text inside of
mw:DisplaySpace node causes the changes to be lost when saving.
Bug: T241906
Change-Id: I78a0cc7a75061a7eefb8b677898b5756326615d6
New changes:
06ad0c769 git-build: Fix name of grunt.log.error
6bed6aaa5 CommentAnnotation: Replace 'reply' with 'comment'
Change-Id: If7e298eaafdd7cf9ab07b6314cb9c214a2072229
New changes:
479b50059 Localisation updates from https://translatewiki.net.
c595d8ab0 Metion task related to Firefox hack
0a160fac2 Don't trust selections from the server
d796f3db5 rebaser: Update dependencies
b097dfaad ve.dm.Transaction: Don't translate offsets inside annotate-only replacements
eadee0343 FragmentWindow: Replace previousSelection with initialFragment
561e88158 Use ve.dm.example.imgSrc everywhere
d1dceab31 DesktopContext: Remove onModelSelect event
85947ac55 Pause synchronizer while staging
9a4dd169d Catch various out-of-bounds exceptions
341114afc Remove CE HTML from DM html test fixture
5d3a673e0 ve.ce.Document test: Add src to test image
182ac338e Evalutate fragment selection after staging
e032fa161 rebaser: Drop document opacity while paused
Change-Id: Id551ee2e6510610b8f2e12cf77ce3c8429700872
I'm not sure if this qualifies as an actual fix. I don't really know
what this code is supposed to do. Maybe the bad array access is a hint
for a completely different error somewhere else. All this patch really
does is silencing the bad array access.
This line of code was introduced with I1b35b28 in May already. Why does
it start failing now?
Bug: T240961
Change-Id: I5ec2dc453e5d8db5d2f9e49058eda001ed021d3d
It is possible, but very rare to have more than a single hook handler
per hook in a single extension. The value can be an array or string in
both version 1 and 2 of extension.json.
Change-Id: Idab5bb1ee606fe07c0886c8f6ae180bad1f9a4e3
