new static method looks for annotation in annotation object.
ve2 Cleanup on annotate method and surface model.
Partially revive UI tools by exchaning old method usage
for ve2 methods.
Change-Id: Id0ac58330292d76801bbcf1d71a919b493f8ab9e
Functional changes (fixes):
* Make writeElement() also update parentNode and parentType for openings
* Also add to fixupStack when opening a wrapper for a text node
Non-functional changes (cleanup&docs):
* Document all variables at the beginning of the function
* Group variables according to where/how they're used
* Move expectedType into writeElement()
* Kill node, duplicates parentNode unnecessarily
* Kill paragraphOpened, was misnamed and unnecessary
* Rename closedElements to reopenElements
Change-Id: Ie5b4e4f30b267943048fdc170accb29139039192
* Push entire elements onto openingStack rather than type strings
* When closing an element, build a clone of the opening and push it onto
closedElements, then insert that clone when reopening the element
Change-Id: I8b0fb44394aed6c471dc6dacaab03e44c2333733
Some of the replacement code was assuming that "does not contain
elements" and "is content" were the same. They're not any more, because
we have content nodes (like image) now, so I need a separate function
to distinguish between these cases.
Change-Id: I206ccdf082b7baddf99d382eb3cdd77ea34fb479
If the last element of the input data array was text, the resulting text
node would have length=0 rather than the expected length value.
Change-Id: I3d089a80b8a447a12ba411b2e11c1b84f14f2959
This was caused by the fact that a non-structural leaf can not have children, which makes it appear incompatible as a sibling to an arbitrary structural element (like a paragraph) but since it can not contain content we can check that instead.
Change-Id: Ie3c58b4b43f2aa6921f8f82aa82511e231207854
Using this argument will only return true if the offset is a place you can add any element to (hence the unrestricted part of it). This is good for testing if a paragraph could potentially be inserted there.
Change-Id: I6cc91da437c52493de03eb687b28966198270fea
This code still needs a lot of work, but it seems to work for most
cases. Things that still need to be done:
* Documentation and comments
* Handling of content and text nodes
** Use Trevor's isContent/canContainContent code which I don't have yet
* Preserve attributes when reopening closed elements
* Tests :)
Change-Id: I3bc16c964ef158693490a61ce12beb21e6fe2a9d
This means inserting things like </p><p> are now synced correctly and
split the paragraph in the model tree. Merges (removing e.g. </p><p>)
aren't supported yet.
Also, this needs tests, Trevor tells me he's working on porting replace
tests from the old ve/ directory
Change-Id: Ic5050849d7d007a1696dc36548654979aedb53a8
I was using data.length to check if the range was out of bounds, but
this is a problem when using selectNodes() inside of tree sync code
(which happens when performing rebuilds). While tree sync is in
progress, the model tree and the linear model don't match, so we
shouldn't be looking at the linear model for information about the model
tree. Instead, get the length of the DocumentNode and use that.
`
Change-Id: I11a378544ce1281a89cdcd4363c5cb1bf56f3434
Currently only implements mode=='leaves', i.e. traverse all leaf nodes.
Seems to work from casual testing, but is missing unit tests. See also
other TODO comments in this commit
Change-Id: I41292c21c627a18af7985e8ef9e23c7b14252b21
* Also removed beforeSplice and afterSplice in favor of just plain splice which is the same as afterSplice used to be - beforeSplice was never used and it was making things more complex looking than needed
Change-Id: Icbbc57eac73a2a206ba35409ab57b3d1a49ab1a5
* Moved node tree assertion to ve.dm.example
* Added rebuildNodes test
* Fixed some typos in rebuildNodes
Change-Id: I4853ded4b062aaa3758435093368bc23667ca3bf
