Use hasContent to
1. Catch cases where the document is empty, e.g. <p></p>
2. Avoid having to use the converter
Change-Id: Ib1bb36824ca871e535bef38cef8137fdfb81b53e
Move shouldShowWelcomeDialog() and stopShowingWelcomeDialog() from
DesktopArticleTarget to DesktopArticleTarget.init, and use them to
deduplicate code in init that manages the wikitext welcome dialog.
Look for both the vehidebetadialog and hidewelcomedialog URL params.
The code in DesktopArticleTarget used vehidebetadialog, but the code in
init for the wikitext welcome dialog used hidewelcomedialog.
Bug: T249954
Change-Id: I19f1a2da36bc65addb52811c3d3c73c1259bc8f5
The base class doesn't use it, it only defines it, and
DesktopArticleTarget is the only subclass that uses it.
MobileArticleTarget calls it, but also overrides it to be a no-op.
Change-Id: Ib3feea94844f4e1ed71dccece7657450516cac89
Factor out the logic for whether the WelcomeDialog should be shown into
its own method, and write it in a less confusing way. Do the same thing
with the logic for setting the preference/storage/cookie for hiding the
WelcomeDialog.
This makes maybeShowWelcomeDialog() much simpler, and removes duplicated
code in DesktopArticleTarget.
There is one minor change in behavior: if the WelcomeDialog is
suppressed using the URL parameter, that no longer causes the preference
to be updated as if the dialog had been shown.
Change-Id: I1d4f912c5f6bd7a2bbad2b209b97c3ec1f250a07
In MediaWiki, section numbers may be prefixed with 'T-' if they refer
to sections on a transcluded page, so they are not really numbers.
Change e2cb9ce93e caused us to treat them as strings most of the time,
but it looks like there are several places where we treated them as
integer numbers, which I missed when making that patch.
The first two changes in ArticleTarget#restoreEditSection fix T248795
and T248968/T249112, respectively. The other changes are cleanup.
Bug: T248795
Bug: T248968
Bug: T249112
Change-Id: I8373a7ab515595769ce6f3051a182c922415b643
Bring in ve.dm.MWInternalLinkAnnotation.static.getTargetDataFromHref
and ve.resolveUrl, so that the file has no dependencies on VE.
Change-Id: I03bc455d5484a6c51f3fa2397c64936b829fe7e3
This code path is triggered when saving a new section in NWE causes an
edit conflict, which should be impossible, but apparently does happen.
Add some TODOs for parameters being added to the API calls in weird
places, instead of the dedicated methods.
Bug: T248364
Change-Id: I0686671e86e35f9ba503d0dd84e9074dde72dc10
New changes:
8a3e25b98 build: Updating acorn to 7.1.1
032a2520d Localisation updates from https://translatewiki.net.
ff82c0966 [BREAKING CHANGE] Remove ve.init.target lookup from TargetWidget
Local changes:
* Pass toolbarGroups explicitly form Target to TargetWidget
Change-Id: I4ff6f432412ab958f2858879b2b857278866350a
This should be a no-op as the inherited switchToWikitext
implementation will always call switchToFallbackWikitext
if 'source' is not passed as a supported mode (which it
isn't currently in MobileFrontend).
Change-Id: I213e7d54d158127b5c42bc05ff9ea2dececc42fe
The code for setting 'watchlist' in the EditAPI request
was completely broken as it always evaluated to 'unwatch'.
Instead pass through 'watchlist' directly from the client
where it must be set to 'watch' or 'unwatch'.
Bug: T245579
Change-Id: Ia5a2bb76ef35a685b39bcc0c4727796acd0f510d
When using TwoColConflict with VisualEditor, the autosave buffer wouldn't
be cleared after saving the successful merge. This would cause a user to
see a "restore changes?" prompt the next time they entered the editor,
with the potential to confuse them and cause them to do extra work,
repeating the conflict resolution unnecessarily.
This change purges the autosave buffer before submitting a merge.
Note that it is not transactional, so there is a chance we're losing the
autosaved content even if the submit will fail.
Bug: T245119
Change-Id: I150023f548c5565412769d644a828176f907bc25
Things I noticed while writing I37f8e89b6d92c419d1b6569891612256342f8139,
but which felt too messy to include in that commit.
* Use promise chaining
* Update documentation
* Remove redundant code
* Split a method that now handles two different errors
* Grumble about localisation messages
Change-Id: I81e28a03af4f6c3452679ef6bbcaa89bb1235122
When the user is saving their edit, we want to ensure that they
understand how it will be attributed. If the user gets logged out or
logs in in another tab, we want to display a message about it before
saving.
Instead of manually managing tokens and handling the 'badtoken' error
to detect this, use the 'assert'/'assertuser' parameters for the API
to detect it for us. Thanks to this we can rely on automatic retrying
for 'badtoken' errors in mw.Api#postWithToken.
It will be possible to share some of this code with other extensions
that already use ArticleTargetSaver, namely DiscussionTools, now that
it doesn't need to manage tokens for VisualEditor.
Bug: T245327
Depends-On: I485f99e1f5f493262b0c9af22370da01adf1e09c
Change-Id: I37f8e89b6d92c419d1b6569891612256342f8139
It was broken on desktop and on mobile, but for different reasons:
Desktop: In change 5f1c68945d,
I removed some code from DesktopArticleTarget that was checking for
`typeof errorDetails === 'string'`. I thought it was unused, but it
was actually needed for this code.
Mobile: overlay.reportError() doesn't work here: that method displays
the error inside the save panel, which is not visible at this point.
This is now solved by treating those errors as if they were API errors,
which is something we were already doing in ArticleTargetSaver.
Change-Id: I5207836f56d65171b1240cef02fc17b9956036ef
It turns out anonymous users can't apply change tags, so change
I2c1d0f8d69bc03e5c1877c790247e165f160e966 broke editing for them.
Bug: T242184
Change-Id: I7c27e4d9995428e213a980819810f235fdfe9435
Explanation of what this code was for: T227628#5339392
As noted on that task, our behavior is actually unintuitive and
distracting, and iOS Safari limitations prevent us from doing it
better.
This reverts commit 600e369347.
Bug: T227628
Change-Id: Id1a5eebd06e4218e3e102165c60791999293d273
This opens up the API so that other tools can use it without being
forced to tag those edits as being from VE.
Also, document that tags is a working parameter that can be passed
through to the edit API.
Bug: T242184
Change-Id: I2c1d0f8d69bc03e5c1877c790247e165f160e966
When NWE is enabled but VE is supposed to be unavailable on the page
(e.g. in talk namespaces), do not show the option to switch to VE in
the welcome dialog.
This is relevant if new users use NWE, due to config like below
(we use this on WMF Office wiki):
$wgDefaultUserOptions['visualeditor-newwikitext'] = true;
Change-Id: Iee8c3d3604a13dcd20efa713e49461ba9b885749
This code works perfectly on mobile now, I believe change
4fb17205b6 fixed that.
Note that the dialog is currently never shown due to the override
in MobileArticleTarget, but I tested after removing it.
Change-Id: I305a01fc78366a3d2d13662e6d71711864e0dffc
The .statusText and .status properties belong to the XMLHttpRequest
object, and are not present on the API response data object. I think
these checks were left over "just in case" when this code was ported
to use mw.Api instead of XMLHttpRequest directly.
MediaWiki API should never return just 'error' as the error code.
Change-Id: Iac6f721881b9405919d3397df6606e54f182bc59
We've just displayed an error message in it, so don't close it.
I'm not sure if this code matters at all though. Usually when
there's an error during loading, code in MobileFrontend will close
the overlay and display an error message in a different way, so our
message won't be visible to the user. But maybe there's some case
I'm missing, and it's harmless. Closing the overlay was messing with
the MobileFrontend code though.
(found when working on I5146b726c5ce213992febb23f24c5937db0b9bfe)
Change-Id: Id1ea44d7bf6ef0f4fc0285e9e606dd415ed0a947
The comment here seems to be wrong, as far as I can tell, this
case can only happen when viewing a diff with no changes
(`data.result === 'nochanges'`) or saving an edit and getting
a captcha (`data.result === 'error'`).
The handling here, added in the recent refactor
b0f4b4c94e, causes both of these
cases to behave wrong (displaying the error message, instead of
empty diff / captcha form).
Change-Id: I305e8ca9ff769c229a93d5fb3307e545a0227f2f
loadFail can result in a retry, in which case it isn't
approraite to reject this promise. Also many of the code
paths call 'tryTeardown' which itself will reject the promise.
Bug: T238332
Change-Id: I366662847304d8ecf79d5899b2804dded67ee999
