The "mode" button is the button that allows to expand and
collapse the dialog. It can't be collapsed when multiple
templates are edited. That's what these lines do,
disabling the button.
"Can expand" is not the correct question. It's always
possible to expand the dialog no matter what it contains.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I60f3060695c80bf5541ef2156be89b85a62bf91b
Introduces new widgets forming the backbone of the experimental
template dialog sidebar.
FIXME: `text-overflow: ellipsis` is not working yet, the container
styles need adjustment.
Bug: T274543
Change-Id: Ie81b84be288553343017c4aaf8691c4e266995f5
* Re-focus the input field after closing the message.
* Store only the message key. That's all that's needed.
* Avoid a class property that's not needed.
* Use the config object instead of calling .setLabel() manually.
Bug: T284742
Change-Id: If8e8bb6460fa5aea8ddd46c2e27b5f08b7772896
We can skip all the up and down message passing by persisting the
parameter placeholders for each template dialog. If the parameter
list is expanded then the placeholder is deleted, on being created
again it will still have state.
To test: create a transclusion with two templates, each having many
parameters. "Add more information" to add parameters, expand the
list by clicking "Show <num> more fields", then delete the parameter
placeholder using the trash cans. Try different permutations to fool
the cache or collide with another template.
This is preparation for other template sidebar dialog work.
Bug: T284636
Change-Id: I23bdd38b173114c2a9afafc7465c4beb92d25869
These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
Begin to extract the wiring between a sidebar and the content pane of
the template dialog booklet layout. Eventually, this helper class
will present a high-level interface like "addPart(id)" and will take
care of creating the outline item, content page, and connecting
events.
Start very simple, take over the "focus" method.
Bug: T284632
Change-Id: I7bc73cc4386b99d95941fc6ed88ab5bd998de014
This reflects better what the method actually does. This patch
is a direct follow-up for the renames started in Ib029fd4.
Change-Id: Ie3e87139a5c2f5ac196e0fcc02fb897fadc99177
The names of the messages keys are very confusing. The order was set
wrong during refactoring in Ib029fd48b393d2ab7d7cff6c842789e22989e944.
We should rename the keys in a follow up in sync with translatewiki.
Bug: T284649
Change-Id: I43794d80b7df7d00441cb583ca53bcab03999e65
This dramatically simplifies the "mode" flag in
MWTransclusionDialog. The main reason to touch this code is:
The flag appears like it will be "single" when the dialog
contains a single template, and "multiple" when there are
multiple templates. But this is not true.
What the flag really does is show/hide the sidebar. The sidebar
is needed to be able to create multi-part templates. But a
dialog that already contains multiple templates can be set to
"single" mode (i.e. the user can collapse the sidebar), and
vice versa.
This patch focuses on private details inside of this class, but
keeps the terminology of a "mode" in some places. E.g. the
messages are not renamed to not cause unnecessary trouble for
translators.
Change-Id: Ib029fd48b393d2ab7d7cff6c842789e22989e944
This class represents a raw wikitext snippet. There is also no
base class that would require us to follow a generic
getValue/setValue naming scheme.
Change-Id: I0891a2f6c0ae0121429a47c39221e99b9653e8e3
There are 2 methods with the same name, but they are very
different. This makes it much easier to understand the
difference, I hope.
Change-Id: Ie1f049b2b14e1fe23f078e281ee797da29dfe3db
This does have a few advantages:
* Less code is executed and less memory consumed when these
elements are not needed.
* Code that belongs together is together.
* No local class properties are created when they are not
needed in the code below.
This patch is kind of a proof of concept. It touches only a few
classes we currently actively work with. If this change is fine
we can change some of the other classes the same way.
Change-Id: I9f548765034f1f69799fff41aeb6c147ff28b82d
The idea is to possibly rename some of these classes, based on
these descriptions. But this should be done in later, separate
patches.
Change-Id: I7f9e5b2382711b434d6dd618489fa3ed8b7a46b4
The main motivation for this patch is actually the comment. The
so called "spec" contains all parameters that are present in a
template, no matter if they are present in the TemplateData
documentation or not. This is critical here.
Change-Id: I5e1c79e3859a27562a9dea1d450cec196aa572ed
Depends on whether this is a new or existing template transclusion.
Split from Ib9b76cac7cd57245e8db2ef10879069a86a6269e
Bug: T276568
Change-Id: I4d22e32fef067b640e9a9389deffaace736c3405
When the existing search results don't contain an exact match
(see previous patch), perform an additional search for the
title. This uses OpenSearch. This is recommended in multiple
places and also used in the quick search field at the top of
MediaWiki.
Again, I came to the conclusion that an isolated unit test
would be complicated and not test much anyway. Better test
on-wiki.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: Ib575248e089ff66814400202d224deff6369c772
This code detects a few edge-cases:
1. When some search results are exact matches, make sure they
are always at the very top.
2. When the prefixsearch API is used, e.g. as a fallback,
redirects show up as a separate metadata structure outside of
the pages array. Consider these and stop if there is already
an exact match.
3. CirrusSearch returns redirects as part of the pages array.
When there is an exact match, make these redirects separate
options and add them to the top.
All of this is case-insensitive, on purpose. In case two
templates with different capitalization exist, we rely on
the backend to return both. The code introduced here is fine
with this.
Notes:
* This doesn't guarantee an exact match is always there. This
requires an additional HTTP request and is done in the next
patch.
* I tried to write unit tests for this, but gave up. The setup
is complicated. An isolated unit test would not test much
anyway. Better test this on-wiki.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I64e1b5633e7b878a4d0d23d66229ca87e69d0045
These are the most minimal (and therefor most stable,
hopefully) hacks I could come up with so far.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I28ba414dd34aad756e29400eb656f0942291a923
