A method isValid() is added to MWTitleInputWidget which would validate the titles given as inputs
Bug: 71249
Change-Id: I7749165652bd3c0bb08ca42289a425fe8e25483d
A method for getTitle() is added which can return the valid title,
or, it can return null, in case the value isn't a valid title
Bug: 72468
Change-Id: I8a13afc9a66c167fe25010743c0d9e1424133d96
These disappeared when DecoratedOptionWidget was split
out of OptionWidget in I508c1555 in oojs-ui back in July,
and apparently no one noticed.
Make MWParameterResultWidget and MWMoreParameterResultWidget
inherit DecoratedOptionWidget instead of OptionWidget so
the icon config parameter is recognized again.
Change-Id: I08d8a0466c211a29eb62043131725073dece4eb5
It works both with and without in isolated dialogs,
but styling things this way breaks in non-isolated dialogs.
Change-Id: Ia498b48d8c199f50df326ddeb61d958cbe2c520d
Indiscriminately styling all .oo-ui-widget elements with a
descendant selector is very evil, use a child selector instead.
The use of a descendant selector broke inline dropdowns.
Change-Id: I25c5007ef1ffab9e59c46c3b11270b8f77610327
Also change this.$overlay (which doesn't even exist) to
config.$overlay in MWTemplatePlaceholderPage and document it.
Compensates for I39df86373ea in oojs-ui.
Change-Id: I4a233c058439d6cfb38d80ece890c8fe57d58f49
Would put this code in onBookletLayoutSet, but that doesn't appear to be
getting called in this case.
Have to detect whether or not we should be changing the disabled status, rather
than just setting it straight away, which would break every other case where
onBookletLayoutSet is called.
Bug: 63158
Change-Id: I6f62479291424d9b2ee0e42481dec9d085169c63
Rather than make a new function to determine whether it should be apply-able or
not (and run some checks again), move the enable/disable call into a new
function to do these checks and set the result.
Bug: 72191
Change-Id: I133afa1784e1afd44054f93ed84018894f7c6400
The autoValue was displayed in the UI but was never
actually written into the template model, unless you
changed the text input and then undid your change.
Bug: 71157
Change-Id: I08e2ba88c24fdee030104c6fb9baafb558ce8a80
* Introduced MWLinkAction which opens the right link inspector
based on what is selected.
* Added MWLinkInspectorTool overriding core's 'link' tool that
executes MWLinkAction
* Removed MWLinkNodeInspectorTool and linkNode command,
they're unneeded now
Bug: 72150
Change-Id: I03bd6ab1f67f31a6e6cb717cf4298e80e64637b7
The correct parameter is &redirects=. Which we really don't want
to use anyway, because if Foo->Bar, using &redirects=1 would
cause a search for "Fo" to return "Bar" as a search suggestion
with no explanation why (and "Foo" wouldn't be visible).
This isn't unsurmountable, we could put in handling similar to
how the category widget handles redirects, but what this code
is trying to do by passing this parameter is definitely wrong.
Change-Id: Idd12c03aaef897d7c1dc70b2a7692e7d71980efe
This was broken when requiresRange was renamed to requiresSelection
and MWUseExistingReferenceDialogTool wasn't updated.
Change-Id: Ia1018520fc253e2f09755d5e85a94a325df80005
On initialization, the image model has an initial scalable that has
the given currentDimensions from Parsoid; these are usually correct.
However, in cases where the wiki settings do not fit the user settings
and the images appear smaller or bigger in practice than the values
of the wiki-defaults, the initial hash will store the wrong values.
We will only know what the real values for the comparison will be
after we get them from the API and the calculation; only at that
point we can update the image model initial hash.
This is important so that later the dialog can properly understand
whether to enable the "apply" button if a user changed an image
to custom size and then back to default.
Change-Id: If17b50cc4a39993f98a20a3fec3ddf5d8cb400b3
OOjs UI killed the 'hide' event that was running this code in the dialog refactor
back in July (Id121fc3a), but left it documented (along with 'show').
Just use the 'toggle' event instead.
Bug: 72168
Change-Id: I172fac81c4cbb89505522011aed57db57ccbc52f
New changes:
69ecc8e Remove MW-specific mobile hack from core
e556440 doc: Use wildcards for Desktop/Mobile …Context and …Surface for simplicity of extension
Local change:
Bring in MobileContext hack to filter out all tools except links and citations from core where
it didn't belong.
Change-Id: Ica837abd45f0ff02b49a44da617bc1fd8e9872d4
New changes:
e251898 [BREAKING CHANGE] Allow tools to specify which selection types they support
Local changes:
New requiresSelection api for tools
Change-Id: Idc3f62d60bfb5710f786734c342f71b1c73fd4c0
* Use .oo-ui-tool-title-text selector rather than .oo-ui-tool-title
to avoid styling accelerator keys.
* Divide all sizes by 0.8, as we no longer need to match the font-size
rule on .oo-ui-tool-title.
* Add CSS for heading1 (which differs between Vector and core VE)
and heading2 (because it looks silly if it's missing).
Change-Id: I12226f0a674037f904149cc10893f5c154767bfc
Instead of putting these popups in an overlay, put them
in the category widget. This makes scrolling work more
nicely, and makes things easier to deal with in general.
This requires that the popup position itself using
getRelativePosition(), because it's no longer in an
overlay. This also means these popups should now position
themselves correctly no matter where they are.
Change-Id: I09a1e5891a897d634c41d386a2307fe3df2a9157
Changes:
* Override ve.ui.SurfaceWidget for use in MW
* Add mw-body-content class to surface view container
* Assert 1em sizing for surface view container to prevent
mw-body-content from applying its own sizing
* Add new scripts and styles to RL config
Bug: 71652
Change-Id: Iac86facdc0c7a0e48c0f3617e2f6c2e7f001525e
We really shouldn't need the inner overlay for this,
we should be able to deal with popups being in
oo-ui-window-overlay. But for now, we're not, and
this fixes the current problems.
Depends on If16d16d2b in oojs-ui.
Bug: 72052
Change-Id: Ie06056b96db19ac4caf1f9c0e3a1c49cfddc6682
The previous check for RTL did not properly recognize
when the UI was in RTL, since the element in question has no explicit
'dir' attribute. The test now uses $element.css( 'direction' ) which
is inherited, and produces a correct result.
Change-Id: Ie30c2038428b10709dc30cb8320bdc94d76a5a18
As of Ieb27c3fd1 apex uses solid black icons with opacity
set in CSS, so make VE icons consistent.
Change-Id: I4c38c497875686503d46a2376a7842f50bf7f2fd
