Note this implementation introduces some technical debt: It adds a
little bit of knowledge about what "part widgets" and the toolbar are
to the parameter SelectWidget. I think this is acceptable.
A "cleaner" implementation is probably so complicated that we don't
want it in the code, for such a minor benefit. However, alternative
patches are very much welcome.
Bug: T313703
Change-Id: I957698d58a7622cbe54bcc2ba454388ba9f09537
* Rename method because it turns out it is not only about the sticky
header, but also relevant when there is no header.
* Move some code to more appropriate places.
* Use 0 as documented in OOUI, not null.
* Set the padding back to 0 when the sticky header is not visible.
As of now this is an unreachable state because the filters never go
away after they have been made visible. Still this code was always
written with this possibility in mind to make it future-proof.
* Performance optimization for the boolean "show filters?" check.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: Iaba08ccd8bf00360fd26f9268d5be43df4f4fbd8
This is a partial revert of Ide45141. Now the scrolling always
happens (again), but properly considers the presence of the sticky
header. It was also not correctly initialized on construction time.
This is a candidate for a backport. The patch is intentionally as
small as possible because of this. Code cleanup will be done in a
later patch.
Bug: T312926
Change-Id: I06425b42566bfb2087846636055ee75e98a05029
Introduced via Ibc56abf. But the OOUI SelectWidget does have some
methods for this already.
This patch also updates some @mixins documentation.
Bug: T302965
Change-Id: Iffbb44d41586786a2165f8d7916f94a52ad19122
The rename in I5a16ab4 was done the exact same time a new usage was
introduced via Ibb717ca. Neither patch shows a conflict. Still there
is one.
I remove the extra `|| null` line because it is just not needed. We
don't need to set the property to null when it was already null.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: Id3f025786c9412e8c1946434113c41356da08098
This is a partial revert of Iaf089f4. It restores the old behavior:
* In case there is already a highlight in the parameter list, just
keep that. Usually there is no highlight at this point, but better
have this check in place to be sure.
* Otherwise always start at the top.
Jumping to the selection is confusing, esp. for keyboard-only users.
The argument goes like this:
* Let's say I'm in the middle of editing values on the right side of
the dialog.
* I want to navigate to the sidebar. How do I do this with the
keyboard? I use the tab key.
* Pressing tab also implies I move the selection to the next
parameter. And the next. Until I reach the end of the parameter
list. Then the selection stays there.
* When I finally reach the sidebar and tab into the parameter list,
the last parameter is selected. But this was merely a side-effect
of me navigating the dialog.
Such a "selection becomes highlighting" behavior was not specified
in T311204.
This patch is requested and approved by PM.
Bug: T312647
Bug: T311204
Change-Id: Ie5b5dfd4fca132050815e6182845ca23adb5f805
The main motivation is to get rid of the vague method name
"setParameter" that was previously used for three different methods
in three different classes. Now the three methods have three
different names.
Change-Id: I938de30b368daf6ce3385b2ed2bca98f316593e1
We would love to name this state "selected", but that term is already
used for a template parameter that is checked/used. The idea of "set"
was to have a list of parameters where one is "set". But the word is
confusing. I suggest "active page" because the entire purpose of the
blue selection is to highlight the currently active page (i.e. the
one you currently interact with on the right side of the dialog) in
the sidebar.
Change-Id: I5a16ab4c193ea05c21bb3bf89ada2ef550d8d6bc
1. Before, removePages() was calling setPage() with null. This makes
sense for removed top-level parts because these are really removed
from both sides of the dialog. Template parameters are never removed.
Only unchecked (and removed from the right side of the dialog, but
this is not what this code is about). When I navigate a parameter
list and uncheck a parameter I need the focus and highlighting to
stay.
2. We have a dedicated method when a parameter is unchecked. This
can check if the removed parameter is also the selected one (called
"set" in this code) and can reset this state. Without losing the
highlighting or anything else.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: Ibb717ca49cae805617ebee196937c79daa72f1c1
Optimization: Don't search for a checkbox that represents a not yet
named parameter placeholder. There is never one.
Fix: Store null, not undefined.
Bug: T312213
Change-Id: I395008f15d13133ad456d0a77571b7aa1c7a7fc9
Fix setParameter() and let it (un)highlight parameters independent
from a selection (called "set" here).
Bug: T312925
Change-Id: Ie4e9ba94659f4f70160193ca6bec804f8a4473e4
This is not only fired when a parameter is checked or unchecked.
It's also not only fired when another parameter in the parameter
SelectWidget is selected. It's always fired just because the
spacebar is pressed. This is so we can scroll that parameter into
view.
Change-Id: Id621405b7ca3116cd4a06f474e49776d0830dccc
This regression from Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431.
Not calling the parent here was is essential, because when clicking
the checkboxes this event will trigger the focus of the whole widget.
That's not what we want in this case though. Also it seems we don't
need any of the logic from the parent and can get rid of that
complexity.
Bug: T312855
Bug: T312856
Bug: T312924
Change-Id: Ib3a2eeeb6d519dfa1bb627049f6b3a4708017e86
Triggers scroll in all situations where highlighting changes.
Including keyboard navigation.
Bug: T312542
Change-Id: I849f64c5cefe0cac3fde6e848b23b7b0cfc489ce
Introducing a set method to have a different state for a set
parameter and a highlighted one in the selection.
Allows us to remove a lot of workarounds for missusing the
highlight state and fixes several issues with these workarounds.
Main implications:
- Keyboard navigation and mouse hover now sets the grey highlight
- If a parameter is set (blue highlight) keyboard navigation returns
when focusing the SelectWidget
- If nothing is set keyboard navigation starts at the top after focus
- Unchecking a parameter using space will not influence the keyboard
focus in the list
- Highlighting a parameter with the mouse lets keyboard navigation
continue from there.
Bug: T312647
Bug: T311204
Bug: T312213
Depends-On: I385dca1d95033961d3844e888521750443e49c95
Change-Id: Iaf089f4b271fd853b17c1aa7f5938510ea8f5431
We don't want to restore selection. Instead, we'll remove all
parameter selections onFocus, in a later patch.
This reverts commit 787d44af66.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: Ia1dc8061dfd1813a58befff5adc5c3882b54d8e2
When blurring out of keyboard parameter navigation, the
last-selected parameter will be highlighted again.
Bug: T312017
Change-Id: I8b0fb667b44b324529d4c45c39bf21573517f989
Tabbing into the parameter select list should highlight the first
parameter, but focusing a checkbox by clicking it to uncheck should
not trigger this highlighting.
Copied from the superclass method.
Bug: T312014
Change-Id: Ia1fd450bad4861eb2815ca21eae69ee31e40ac08
In a test case with 200 templates where all but a few parameters are
unused the loading time is cut in half.
Bug: T300974
Change-Id: Ice850cb9e5e95b9e3a19ff511b3a4f32117c7199
Same random finds while working on something else. I carefully
checked and made sure these methods are actually called without the
optional parameter.
Change-Id: Iab36fd130258322985b5d6e7f8e1f7b4ee235ba2
I bit more logic was needed to make sure, the state of the widget
resets when all unused fields are added during search.
Bug: T299811
Change-Id: I3006c233fda5490e323bc3a3e631bf0c1199bda3
Allows setting aria labels and descriptions on elements in a
convinient way. I did not use the the .mixin. convention here for
because there's already another mixin in that folder that's also
not having .mixin. as part of its name. And then there's also no
no need to open up that extra namespace here.
If we move this upstream at some point this can be changed though.
Bug: T291284
Change-Id: I1b3d40400d539f851f13719e16ced200968a7f92
This prevents multiple highlighting, which was possible to achieve by clicking
sequentially in the input fields of two parameters from different templates.
Change-Id: I404936f1569ab544b693a9bc6921381636ea8f40
We don't need to distinguish between these any more. Both are
"active", i.e. both focus the widget on the right side of the
dialog. Sometimes the "choose" event is fired to actually add
or remove a parameter. Sometimes it's fired, but the state of
the parameter doesn't change (for whatever reason, i.e.
because the parameter name was clicked instead of the
checkbox). There is nothing to do in this case, except for the
focus change.
Change-Id: I3c7c0c81a075ccff76eda0a4fb2aa1ac7be3cec5
* The template model fires an "add" event. Listeners don't
automatically steal the focus any more.
* Instead there is a separate "focusTemplateParameterById" event
fired from all relevant places that add a parameter.
* The "remove" doesn't steal the focus any more.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I93f17727524bfbcf6f11647a6c2441781337c4cc
The 'classes' property is a OOUI interface. Personally, I like
this code style better.
However. It appears like the code style in this codebase is
somewhat mixed. It looks like the top-level .$element always
uses .addClass(), while other code uses the 'classes' property.
Should we unify this?
Change-Id: I9ecd75e22d00f06ffd707f766dc9e8d748ff9a37
