The original intend of that rule was not clear to me and it seems
it got dragged along for some time. I checked the DOM in the
collapsed state to see where this could even apply in the new
interface and found no other place than the one where we overwrite
it again.
I guess it can go away.
Change-Id: I2886db33c5f06d1c49acc4743c9acc198339de36
These are internal to the two-pane layout and sidebar, so the dialog
doesn't need to be involved.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I5f05bc119dc213d8e31db62a3808a2fadaf35d99
This is a direct follow-up to I7f22e4b. I found that the way the
margins have been arranged became a little more complicated with
I7f22e4b. This patch tries to go back to the – I think – simpler way
it was done before.
It should look the same as before down to the pixel.
Bug: T311223
Change-Id: I2c7789922078fa98f15f0b65de4c0efdf878a13a
The one usage of this wasn't working. FIXME: maybe we want to
restore the behavior, to focus the first parameter in the dialog
after opening.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ibe0151fbedb3a9716bb231b5d398c4ae670fd667
This defaults to false. It looks like this default is used in the
MWTemplateDialog base class. However, it also looks like this base
class is never used on it's own. All users we know use the subclass
MWTransclusionDialog where "editable" is true.
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=%2C%5Cs*ve%5C.ui%5C.MWT(emplate%7Cransclusion)Dialog&files=%5C.js%24
In the process I also remove some comments that literally repeat the
code and don't add any knowledge because of this.
Bug: T310867
Change-Id: Ie245aab80d1e77a8406f5591062e9cf49fd9613f
This code was meant to select the first parameter of a template the
moment it is added. It's at least partly broken because it doesn't
consider the so called "prompted" parameters that have been added
just a few lines above. It's a questionable feature anyway. We are
going to refine all focus-related behavior anyway. Let's remove this
broken stuff and reimplement it later (probably in a different place)
when we continue working on this.
The FIXME was added in I720ce1a.
Bug: T311223
Change-Id: I1801efe38387b5e7a1b76417c1e5d7db4e4b96d0
This was done in 3 rather "random" places:
1. Whenever a template is manually added. But rather late, after the
template was added, in an event handler that is about focus
behavior. It should not continue to manipulate the template that
was just added.
2. When the dialog opens with a template preloaded by name, as it is
done from the citation menu.
3. When the dialog is about to finish loading.
This patch fixes 2 issues:
* Get rid of a duplicate call (number 2 and 3) when using the
citation menu.
* Move number 1 to a place where it's executed much earlier, and
only when the user clicks "add template" in a template placeholder.
There is no other way to add a template to an existing transclusion,
but it's still a more appropriate place I feel.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I8a65ad703b95ba2092e9ef73493e9903e96b0dd6
This still works for a dialog with just the template placeholder,
because the page is already chosen as "current" in the stackLayout.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ibc1d33b02d34f70548d9f7365e085847ef0b2a51
New changes:
a035f62f6 Localisation updates from https://translatewiki.net.
c5804af0a Handle Shift+Enter at the start/end of pre nodes too
Bug: T60773
Change-Id: I2fa0bda7ea2a831f62c5df428d0352bb31c4d823
Includes moving CSS that already moved from the TemplateDialog CSS
file to the DialogLayout LESS file.
Width and height had no effect. Neither on desktop/mobile. I guess
the control's height covers for that. Float could be removed due to
the flex layout.
Some more specific rules could cover for the !important overrides.
Change-Id: I7f22e4be37c8f227845aed97281faefe26241091
Pre-parsing with $.parseHTML is not required as we
1) no longer modified the DOM before appending
2) trust the HTML coming from the API
Change-Id: If549a0e647ce830d4f5de2bb94c08a895e460667
This causes one small behavior change: when deleting one of several
wikitext transclusions or a part following a template without
parameters, the selection would previously be set to the *previous*
part, and now it's the *next* part. This is arguably more consistent
with the behavior when removing eg. templates with parameters, after
which the next part is selected.
Doesn't affect removing parameters.
TODO: We might want to restore the already-broken behavior to focus
the first parameter of a newly-inserted template.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ic5f47e31512d1a3949caf60613bd05b9a3bdf478
