* Remove need for manual hacking of sub groups via "msg" strings
carefully prepended to every assertion.
* Improve CI details, by reporting the specific case that failed,
and local dev via ability to re-run each case, and reporting names
directly in the HTML Reporter and CLI summary.
* Reduce need for assert.async() and tracking of callbacks, especially
to improve failure details in case of Promise rejection.
Current logic was likely to cause a confusing timeout instead of a
clear failure if the promise ends up rejected.
QUnit propagates these as part of awaiting and asserting the test
closure's promise value (as async fn) automatically.
This approach also avoids the pitfal of a falsely passing test
when an assertion inside a done() handler was never reached.
* Use modern for-of where possible to remove need for closures and
arrow functions. Thus reducing complexity of test code, where
complexity should be kept lowest to avoid false confidence.
* Use plain for-in instead of overly complex Object.keys().forEach().
Change-Id: I934a266e75e64371081f104cfb867fb2c282c84a
The idea of the code under test is that it combines the results from
2 different API requests in a specific way. This is a first basic test
where both search results are small.
Bug: T291158
Change-Id: Ic4de57fb6b85afb952ea604769fddd06d44814c0
This focuses on a few trivial cases where the syntax helps making
the code more readable. One level of indirection is gone with this.
Change-Id: Ibf25d7eaa06952e69b36bd5a78a48d04ac62890c
This will avoid that the search breaks in edge cases where symbols
are used.
Including a fallback for ES5 browsers. The fallback should cover
almost all cases. Worst case would be not adding the asterisk even
though it might be valid.
Bug: T284554
Change-Id: Ie4aee0b77492b7a73bc251a8723a206dbd641600
These are the most minimal (and therefor most stable,
hopefully) hacks I could come up with so far.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I28ba414dd34aad756e29400eb656f0942291a923
