We ended mixing two concepts in a single method:
* We need a method that allows us to create the parameter list widget
when it's needed, even if it's empty. This is relevant when a template
is entirely empty, and the first parameter is added. This wasn't
working. Instead the parameter list was created with all parameters.
* On initialization we either want all parameters to be shown, or only
used ones. But this code is only needed once, on initialization. I
ended inlining this code in this patch.
Bug: T300640
Bug: T304046
Change-Id: I6620a870e4420dcb8fecf522b3274458eeec891d
Due to the stickyness we need to scroll the header and the first
visible item from the parameter list to have the best result in all
cases.
We also only want to scroll when the user triggered hiding the
fields. Not when the template outline view is initialized.
Bug: T302965
Change-Id: I84d293888a7dbf13ec655c293c0fc3a79edca698
In a test case with 200 templates where all but a few parameters are
unused the loading time is cut in half.
Bug: T300974
Change-Id: Ice850cb9e5e95b9e3a19ff511b3a4f32117c7199
These are only needed when we need to access a specific `this` from
within another `function () {}` context. This is not the case in the
situations here.
This is split from Ibf25d7e to make it smaller and easier to argue
about.
Change-Id: Ide1476de91fc343aa992ad92a1321d3a38b06dd0
I bit more logic was needed to make sure, the state of the widget
resets when all unused fields are added during search.
Bug: T299811
Change-Id: I3006c233fda5490e323bc3a3e631bf0c1199bda3
Covers the base functionality to hide the parameters. Performance
optimizations could be done in a follow up.
Bug: T300640
Change-Id: Ia99b5da392273f1445e475a0720a656460612dcf
The search field is of not much use when there is not really anything
to search. It wastes more space than the actual list of parameters.
Approved by UX, see T298259#7626538.
Bug: T298259
Change-Id: I01784a1c463d8b0b504897b20179719f91597d19
From the user's perspective nothing changes. A template without
parameters doesn't show anything. (Technically there was an empty
<div>, but it doesn't do anything.) The moment the first parameter
is added the required sub-widget is created and available from there
on.
This saves loading time and memory, especially when a multi-part
template contains many templates without parameters.
Bug: T298259
Change-Id: Ib1bd2cd0be4fece4acc92e6e5f63133a7986cf81
From the user's perspective this is the same as before: When a
template doesn't have any parameters, there is no search field. The
moment the first (undocumented) parameter is added the search field
appears.
This is just delayed now. The widgets are only created the moment
they are actually needed.
This saves loading time and memory, especially in a multi-part
transclusion with many zero-parameter templates.
This also makes it a lot easier to change the minimal number of
parameters from 1 to e.g. 4.
Includes reverting the flexible header composition done in
Ib050e30a50ef965c1524e977d3a600c3ff836774
Bug: T298259
Change-Id: Ied7541d8d5c0b478a439dd31ce072e634287f181
The search field will stay at the top of the window while scrolling a
single template. In multi-part transclusions, the header will also
be sticky.
Hides the template header in single-part transclusions.
Bug: T298618
Change-Id: Ib050e30a50ef965c1524e977d3a600c3ff836774
Allows setting aria labels and descriptions on elements in a
convinient way. I did not use the the .mixin. convention here for
because there's already another mixin in that folder that's also
not having .mixin. as part of its name. And then there's also no
no need to open up that extra namespace here.
If we move this upstream at some point this can be changed though.
Bug: T291284
Change-Id: I1b3d40400d539f851f13719e16ced200968a7f92
When changing the source in the described-by attributes the screen
reader will read the text of the new source when the status changes.
Just changing the text within the elements holding the descriptions
does not work.
Bug: T291284
Change-Id: I31cc3061cf6c1f699babe41e99e0711f0eb03646
The event "focusTemplateParameterById" targets the right side of the
dialog. The input field for the parameter should be focussed. This
doesn't make any sense when the parameter was just removed (i.e.
unselected).
Change-Id: Ie75b1edaebe9d0444b98e66cb56a5c7774393bea
This prevents multiple highlighting, which was possible to achieve by clicking
sequentially in the input fields of two parameters from different templates.
Change-Id: I404936f1569ab544b693a9bc6921381636ea8f40
The behavior of the enter key in the new template dialog sidebar
is somewhat inconsistent. When pressing enter on the name of a
template it sometimes just doesn't work, but focuses something
else.
I realized this is because the message "The … template doesn't
yet exist." does not have a link. There is nothing to focus in
this element. The code just gives up and the selection returns
to whatever was selected before.
It works when there is a link in the template header. But this
is not even that useful.
Let's try to always focus the first parameter instead. The user
can still press Shift + Tab to focus the link to the template
page.
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: Id314ee8ebf47d387df08c7fb432094b6d8f7a3d2
This patch improves the error handling for when a user tries to add
a parameter which is either an alias of a existing parameter, the
primary name of a existing aliased parameter, or a name/alias of an
existing parameter which is shown with an override label.
The error message was modified to always refer to the conflicting
parameter using the same name that is has in the sidebar.
Example: A parameter named "Parameter B" is already present in the
sidebar under its alias "B". When a user tries to add "Parameter B",
the new error message will inform the user that the parameter they
are trying to add already exists as "B".
Bug: T285869
Change-Id: I762b72b6cf14eb8ff5fcef63b4dcb70e297050de
We don't need to distinguish between these any more. Both are
"active", i.e. both focus the widget on the right side of the
dialog. Sometimes the "choose" event is fired to actually add
or remove a parameter. Sometimes it's fired, but the state of
the parameter doesn't change (for whatever reason, i.e.
because the parameter name was clicked instead of the
checkbox). There is nothing to do in this case, except for the
focus change.
Change-Id: I3c7c0c81a075ccff76eda0a4fb2aa1ac7be3cec5
* The template model fires an "add" event. Listeners don't
automatically steal the focus any more.
* Instead there is a separate "focusTemplateParameterById" event
fired from all relevant places that add a parameter.
* The "remove" doesn't steal the focus any more.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I93f17727524bfbcf6f11647a6c2441781337c4cc
The original idea was to make the interface as narrow as
possible. However, it turns out it's better to model the
"templateParameterClick" event more closely after the "choose"
event.
This is split off to make reviewing the following patches
easier.
Change-Id: I271f576c6cd756cecfc6cb1fd64810f8da5c3575
I tried hard to come up with the best possible names. Some of the
criteria I used:
* Longer and more unique is better. This makes it much easier to
e.g. search for the event name.
* The term "part" should only be used for top-level parts. While
template parameters have a unique id, they are not a subclass
of …TransclusionPartModel and therefor not "parts".
* BookletLayout manages "pages" via "page names".
* The page names of top-level parts are identical with the part
id, see ve.ui.MWTemplateDialog.getPageFromPart.
* The page names of parameters are identical with the parameter
model id, see ve.ui.MWTemplateDialog.onAddParameter.
Some code knows parameter ids, but not what pages are. Other code
knows page names, but not what parameters are. The transition
currently happens in the …OutlineContainerWidget. We might want
to move this point up to the …TemplateDialog. But I would argue
this is good enough for now and can be changed later, if needed.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: Iab2805b3203988db400b67c8d00e48905fdc53dc
Note there are currently two different code paths utilizing two
different events. The existing event handler actually changes
the selection of the top-level part in the sidebar (the
corresponding template name turns blue). The new event handler
highlights a parameter (it turns gray). This is currently
intentional (partly because of a bug in OOUI). I will try to
merge these code paths, if possible.
Please test, and if it works fine from the user's perspective,
please merge it as it is for now.
Bug: T285323
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I8fafee68b8b7ff225c7b3c327f483f3426d8129c
This makes sure the corresponding top-leve part is selected in
the list on the left when navigating the main area on the
right.
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: Id1b398e1786c4099d5b14fe88dd21a106269096b
Most notably:
* Move some code snippets from the outer …TemplateWidget to
the inner …SelectWidget, without introducing new
dependencies.
* Move all knowledge about the item class
…OutlineParameterWidget class into …SelectWidget.
* Some more self-documenting method names for event handlers.
* Avoid the somewhat ambiguous variable name "checkbox" in
favor of "item". That's how it's named in the upstream OOUI
…SelectWidget.
This is extracted from the following patch Ibd94c39. The
difference is that the following patch adds a new dependency:
The …SelectWidget gets to know the template model. This patch
here contains all changes that are possible without this new
dependency.
Bug: T288827
Change-Id: I187f313c84424b28005d9276cb1356029f9ebb75
This replaces I8cf9ecd.
Significant changes:
* The …OutlineContainerWidget doesn't need to know the
BookletLayout any more. The only remaining resason to have
this dependency was some focus management. This is now done
via an event.
* Renamed an existing event to match the new one. The two
really mean and do the exact same, even if they are
triggered from two different places.
* Simplified some existing code.
* Updated documentation.
Bug: T288827
Change-Id: Ifcf2cadabf7fa4b8ecb72e3937003fab3b00d9bb
The base widgets we are going to use (notably OO.ui.OptionWidget
and OO.ui.SelectWidget) also have events, and some of them use
the same names. Such conflicts are really hard to track down.
This is meant to be temporary. The goal is to use the events
from the base classes and get rid of the custom ones, if
possible.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I0f103a5bbb8fb800e57009e3bf709f00a651fdda
This is what actually happens:
* We call `addParameter()`.
* This triggers an `add` event.
* This calls an `MWTemplateDialog.onAddParameter` event handler.
* This code doesn't check if a parameter already exists (because
it shouldn't). It detroys the page in the content pane on the
right and recreates it from scratch.
The only reason we do this is to focus the input field on the
right. This patch introduces a dedicated event to do this.
Bug: T288827
Change-Id: I47effe05427cfabfcf534920edee79521eaa033f
As discussed in Ia44da16. This change avoids possibly hundreds
of events (when a template does have hundreds of parameters),
and replaces them with a single one.
Bug: T288202
Change-Id: Ic819e8c93e872b653c238f396f1f327b6a8759d2
