Needed after Ia18f31a299338f94e69f1882e6e477f3a22ae905 in VE core.
Bug: T307849
Depends-On: Ia18f31a299338f94e69f1882e6e477f3a22ae905
Change-Id: I87f3ac0974702ecaf7f5459604371de06f4a5756
Now done in VE core since Ie86217ba5651df8c427464e460ed836903834a3c.
Bug: T308200
Depends-On: Ie86217ba5651df8c427464e460ed836903834a3c
Change-Id: I3f65b0bc100895f7bd2262c3cbb5231fb055758b
The Apex skin (not to be confused with the Apex OOUI theme)
is abandonware. Keeping files around that pretend to support it
is just maintenance debt.
Change-Id: I176e4e25307ab8ca4166a6e9b55e3bec4f058d05
The class .ve-init-mw-target-surface is used on the same element
as .ve-ui-surface. This element contains surface overlays
.ve-ui-overlay, which can contain other .ve-ui-surface elements
(inside inspectors), which would then erroneously have the target
surface styles applied.
Bug: T284312
Change-Id: I8d20a830dc48f6a098b0f9e9a7c7c1656de0fe56
* Create getSurfaceClasses method.
* Pass surfaceClasses to target widgets.
This ensures that the 'content' class is passed to mobile
target widgets, and the 'mw-body-content' class is added
in a less hacky way.
Change-Id: Ibce6d1a1d0fda63cca354761f1b91f808858e95b
the former is no longer present
note: i assume the style is still needed, I have
not tested
Bug: T255718
Change-Id: I4e7851362fc0d64097aeff5ec1535f8fe7480682
Explanation of what this code was for: T227628#5339392
As noted on that task, our behavior is actually unintuitive and
distracting, and iOS Safari limitations prevent us from doing it
better.
This reverts commit 600e369347.
Bug: T227628
Change-Id: Id1a5eebd06e4218e3e102165c60791999293d273
New changes:
4af3f84f7 Mark surface as "showAsDeactivated" when opening a window
79eb0e4e5 ve.ce.Surface: Guard against focusing a un-initialized surface
4124c275e [BREAKING CHANGE] ve.ui.TargetWidget: Construct a real target inside the widget
Local changes:
* Use new target widget
* Remove calls to deprecated methods
* 'surfaceReady' event was upstreamed
Bug: T236400
Change-Id: I765d657c172d96c3b2e2ae5998083e4926a31f15
Previously, the ve-mw/init/ directory contained two kinds of files:
those that were used when initializing VE, and those that may be
loaded even if VE is not going to be initialized at all. The latter
kind must not use the `ve` global variable.
After moving those files to ve-mw/preinit/ we can enforce this with
.eslintrc.json in that directory. This would have prevented T228684.
(Technically they merely must not use `ve.init`, and may use `ve`,
but that's harder to enforce. We should instead move the few non-init
methods out of `ve`: now, track, trackSubscribe, trackSubscribeAll).
Also, group some files under ve-mw/init/: targets/ now (only)
contains ve.init.mw.Target and its subclasses, apiresponsecache/
now contains ve.init.mw.ApiResponseCache and its subclasses.
Bug: T228684
Change-Id: I945249a27f6a0fa10a432d5c5dc57bc7e0461fd8
In order to get the desired padding, the `em` values were pre-multiplied
by the parent font-size, which was assumed to be `0.875em` for normal
surfaces and `(13.3333/16)em` for wikitext surfaces. (That should have
been `(13/16em)`, by the way, but that's a negligible difference.)
Unfortunately, the font-size for wikitext surfaces is actually `13px`.
Unlike `em`, `px` values are not affected by custom browser font-size,
so when one was set, the final padding was all out of whack.
Use `rem` units instead to respect the custom browser font-size,
without getting problems due to the parent element font-size.
We don't need separate rules for .ve-ui-mwWikitextSurface now.
Bug: T222217
Change-Id: Ib7ffbf09d5aa23fddb894aa3b081ec993ddcee2d
The good thing is that every time our CSS overrides get less crazy.
See 75ff121b29 for the last time.
Change-Id: I9d81aff6a24ec28850563e00206e21c4a6593d2e
New changes:
77076f828 LinkAnnotationInspector: add a "label" field on mobile
Local changes:
* Updates for mobile link label editing
Bug: T229431
Change-Id: Ib0489f6f59b228ebc4a20f7a0a515be938a8f6d3
The .oo-ui-popupToolGroup-handle styles only need to apply to the
editTools toolbar, where they override OOUI styles so that our
"stretched" toolbar works; they don't need to apply to the pageTools
toolbar, which contains just the editor switcher, and where they make
it look different from the MF wikitext editor toolbar for no reason.
Change-Id: I21315b34be0a7c3938f84ada720ff5754d953879
Our overlay could be higher than the viewport, allowing the viewport
to scroll again.
Bug: T212159
Change-Id: I1e97d1963b214fc7673c33ae6c14ab7b0b80f31d
If the translations of save/publish button messages like
'visualeditor-savedialog-label-publish-short-start' contain spaces
(e.g. in Bengali 'bn'), the button on mobile would wrap over two
or more lines, due to weird styles we have for the mobile toolbar.
Change-Id: Ieb439ae489ab7110b81382ffdcf0d3d3ad2f84ac
I think mostly the incompatible changes were made in commit
I5a7d73b20617cb3c6d6379084ac4bea23ec3bc74, but I didn't try
to track them down.
Also fix an issue where hrefs in section edit links generated
by this code were wrong.
Bug: T208102
Change-Id: Ibf6564bc0dcb7fcb420739a897b54346a01add02
We need to set 'padding-top' matching the height of the toolbar
somewhere, so that the toolbar doesn't cover the top of the editing
surface. Apparently moving it from the current place (the top-level
wrapper for the MF overlay) to the document node (the node with the
'contenteditable' attribute) allows Safari to properly scroll the
cursor into view when focussing, rather than scrolling it offscreen.
Bug: T219066
Change-Id: Iee1e03bce24c2f149a0aa0f393a37b9db43eaca6
