This fixes a bug where the second replace operation in a transaction
would cause the rebuild of the wrong range, or the adjustment of the
wrong text node.
Change-Id: I9b1c68d84999d538fe10bb193f4dfdd694121d2a
This is needed to make the results of certain transactions' tree sync
round-trip cleanly through the ve.dm.Document constructor
Change-Id: I2ab0758ec6bd7afba5b6645c7330f9fa2d45205d
new static method looks for annotation in annotation object.
ve2 Cleanup on annotate method and surface model.
Partially revive UI tools by exchaning old method usage
for ve2 methods.
Change-Id: Id0ac58330292d76801bbcf1d71a919b493f8ab9e
* Push entire elements onto openingStack rather than type strings
* When closing an element, build a clone of the opening and push it onto
closedElements, then insert that clone when reopening the element
Change-Id: I8b0fb44394aed6c471dc6dacaab03e44c2333733
* Added converters to all relevant node implementations
* Added new annotation objects with their own factory
Change-Id: I9870d6d5eac45083929d74d2e58917d0939ca917
Also:
* Refactored tests
* Added tests for ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion
* Added tests for ve.dm.Transaction.newFromRemoval
* Fixed problems with ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion
* Added ve.dm.Node.canBeMergedWith which is partially a port of ve.Node.getCommonAncestorPaths merged with canMerge from within ve.dm.DocumentNode.prepareRemoval from the old ve codebase
Change-Id: Ibbc3887d08286d8ab33fd6296487802d65b319fa
Copy-pasting things like "text<IMAGE>moretext" failed spectacularly,
this commit fixes that.
* Check for content rather than structure in the inserted/removed data
* In the content case
** Run selectNodes() over the removal range, rather than just the cursor
*** i.e. no longer assume that content replacements only affect one node
** If there is structure involved, rebuild all affected nodes
Change-Id: I80e40b5b7c514a3fb105d57e4a17770d0fefaaea
Some of the replacement code was assuming that "does not contain
elements" and "is content" were the same. They're not any more, because
we have content nodes (like image) now, so I need a separate function
to distinguish between these cases.
Change-Id: I206ccdf082b7baddf99d382eb3cdd77ea34fb479
If the last element of the input data array was text, the resulting text
node would have length=0 rather than the expected length value.
Change-Id: I3d089a80b8a447a12ba411b2e11c1b84f14f2959
This was caused by the fact that a non-structural leaf can not have children, which makes it appear incompatible as a sibling to an arbitrary structural element (like a paragraph) but since it can not contain content we can check that instead.
Change-Id: Ie3c58b4b43f2aa6921f8f82aa82511e231207854
Using this argument will only return true if the offset is a place you can add any element to (hence the unrestricted part of it). This is good for testing if a paragraph could potentially be inserted there.
Change-Id: I6cc91da437c52493de03eb687b28966198270fea
The 'insert' and 'remove' operations weren't implemented in the
transaction processor and were a holdover from the old DM
implementation.
Also migrated the tests, especially those that asserted that consecutive
insert/remove operations were combined (this is no longer the case now
that they are replace operations)
Change-Id: I2379fe92b331c5316f70f4b695397da41581cce9
in the new DM. Change method name getAnnotationRange from offset to
getAnnotatedRangeFromOffset. Write tests
Change-Id: I7028803065409e271ceced73e4803954d4a956dc
getAnnotationRangeFromOffset and offsetContainsAnnotation
which deprecated getAnnotationBoundaries, and getIndexOfAnnotation
write unit tests for proof
Change-Id: I6c0d4e3ca96dd569b1909cd22fce68c3a6fe382c
By first summarizing a node tree or node selection and then using the normal deepEqual function we are able to take advantage of native QUnit functionality to make diagnosing a problem easier under failing conditions and reduce the verbosity of the output under passing conditions.
Change-Id: I4af5d69596cf5459aa32f61ee6d5b8355233c3df
* Make nodeSelectionEqual() accept a desc parameter and use it for
building descriptions
* Put the array element number in the desciption too
* Add descriptions for selectNodes tests and pass them through
Change-Id: Icd2894d11516234598cbd984cc8d88f705bfc1d6
* Don't crash if b.children has a different length than expected
* Don't crash if b.children is absent but expected
* Check if b.children is present when it's not expected
* Add assertion when neither a.children not b.children are present; this
makes the number of assertions for leaves equal to the number of
assertions for branches
* Check attributes too
* Accept a desc parameter, and add node paths (like
list/listItem/paragraph/text) to the descriptions
* Use desc parameter for all calls (some tests were already using it,
even though it didn't actually exist)
Change-Id: Ic56d27d20377e7f4fdfa038fdf4ebe00dcb3e062
This was because the while loop was never entered as end >= left was
true from the start. Convert the while loop to a do-while loop to make
sure it runs at least once
Change-Id: I9c6436a7b296e65a36b8301095b6edd00507d321
