Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Inez Korczyński 4ab9d112b7 Created QUnit tests for ve.Document.selectNodes method (mode "branches")
Change-Id: Iee243ffe1a71a23a3ad540421a0cbbb973433f58
2012-10-04 15:24:02 -07:00
Timo Tijhof b1d9c83b5d Object management: Object create/inherit/clone utilities
* For the most common case:
  - replace ve.extendClass with ve.inheritClass (chose slightly
    different names to detect usage of the old/new one, and I
    like 'inherit' better).
  - move it up to below the constructor, see doc block for why.

* Cases where more than 2 arguments were passed to
  ve.extendClass are handled differently depending on the case.

  In case of a longer inheritance tree, the other arguments
  could be omitted (like in "ve.ce.FooBar, ve.FooBar,
  ve.Bar". ve.ce.FooBar only needs to inherit from ve.FooBar,
  because ve.ce.FooBar inherits from ve.Bar).

  In the case of where it previously had two mixins with
  ve.extendClass(), either one becomes inheritClass and one
  a mixin, both to mixinClass().

  No visible changes should come from this commit as the
  instances still all have the same visible properties in the
  end. No more or less than before.

* Misc.:
 - Be consistent in calling parent constructors in the
   same order as the inheritance.
 - Add missing @extends and @param documentation.
 - Replace invalid {Integer} type hint with {Number}.
 - Consistent doc comments order:
   @class, @abstract, @constructor, @extends, @params.
 - Fix indentation errors
   A fairly common mistake was a superfluous space before the
   identifier on the assignment line directly below the
   documentation comment.
   $ ack "^ [^*]" --js modules/ve
 - Typo "Inhertiance" -> "Inheritance".
 - Replacing the other confusing comment "Inheritance" (inside
   the constructor) with "Parent constructor".
 - Add missing @abstract for ve.ui.Tool.
 - Corrected ve.FormatDropdownTool to ve.ui.FormatDropdownTool.js
 - Add function names to all @constructor functions. Now that we
   have inheritance it is important and useful to have these
   functions not be anonymous.

   Example of debug shot: http://cl.ly/image/1j3c160w3D45

   Makes the difference between

   < documentNode;
   > ve_dm_DocumentNode
     ...
     : ve_dm_BranchNode
       ...
       : ve_dm_Node
         ...
         : ve_dm_Node
           ...
           : Object
             ...

   without names (current situation):

   < documentNode;
   > Object
     ...
     : Object
       ...
       : Object
         ...
         : Object
           ...
           : Object
             ...

   though before this commit, it really looks like this
   (flattened since ve.extendClass really did a mixin):

   < documentNode;
   > Object
     ...
     ...
     ...

   Pattern in Sublime (case-sensitive) to find nameless
   constructor functions:
   "^ve\..*\.([A-Z])([^\.]+) = function \("

Change-Id: Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e
2012-09-06 15:29:31 -07:00
Trevor Parscal 255ce870e2 Puttin' em white-spacers where they aught'a be
function() -> function ()
){ -> ) {

Change-Id: I20a85fcf79d7aec64f7f2559e84c0279550d4eea
2012-08-06 18:52:19 -07:00
Trevor Parscal 76bac7d152 Move test files
Change-Id: Id0a0bd5b4a91f702cad34e9f5e7f2121763abffd
2012-07-25 14:35:49 -07:00
Renamed from tests/ve/ve.example.js (Browse further)